Revealing hidden clonal complexity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by qualitative and quantitative improvement of sampling

AbstractThe analysis of microevolution events, its functional relevance and impact on molecular epidemiology strategies, constitutes one of the most challenging aspects of the study of clonal complexity in infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated whether two improved sampling schemes could provide access to the clonal complexity that is undetected by the current standards (analysis of one isolate from one sputum). We evaluated in 48 patients the analysis by mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit–variable number tandem repeat of M. tuberculosis isolates cultured from bronchial aspirate (BAS) or bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and, in another 16 cases, the analysis of a higher number of isolates from independent sputum samples. Analysis of the isolates from BAS/BAL specimens revealed clonal complexity in a very high proportion of cases (5/48); in most of these cases, complexity was not detected when the isolates from sputum samples were analysed. Systematic analysis of isolates from multiple sputum samples also improved the detection of clonal complexity. We found coexisting clonal variants in two of 16 cases that would have gone undetected in the analysis of the isolate from a single sputum specimen. Our results suggest that analysis of isolates from BAS/BAL specimens is highly efficient for recording the true clonal composition of M. tuberculosis in the lungs. When these samples are not available, we recommend increasing the number of isolates from independent sputum specimens, because they might not harbour the same pool of bacteria. Our data suggest that the degree of clonal complexity in tuberculosis has been underestimated because of the deficiencies inherent in a simplified procedure

Evaluation of bone marrow and blood cultures for the recovery of mycobacteria in the diagnosis of disseminated mycobacterial infections

AbstractThis study evaluated the validity of bone marrow (BM) and blood specimens for the diagnosis of disseminated mycobacterial infections (DMIs). From 1990 to February 1997, all specimens were processed with the lysis-centrifugation procedure; thereafter (until December 2001), they were processed with the BACTEC Myco/F Lytic system. Twenty-three paired BM-blood specimens with mycobacteria in at least one specimen were studied from 23 patients. The strains isolated were 14 Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) and nine M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC). Blood specimens had a statistically significant greater sensitivity for the isolation of MAC than BM (100% vs. 57.1%, respectively), whereas sensitivity for the isolation of MTBC was equal for the two specimen types (66.7%). Although not statistically significant, the times required to detect mycobacteria from blood specimens were lower than those from BM in the MycoF/Lytic system. Overall, blood cultures represented a more sensitive and less invasive alternative to BM cultures for the diagnosis of disseminated mycobacteriosis caused by MAC, especially when the MycoF/Lytic system was used, but provided no advantage for the diagnosis of DMI caused by MTBC

Discriminación entre poblaciones de abejas (apis mellifera L.) del sur de España, centro de Portugal y Madeira

Tradicionalmente se ha considerado que las abejas que viven en la Península Ibérica pertenecen a la raza Apis mellifera iberica, que se encuentra emparentada con la raza A. m. intermissa que coloniza el norte de África y la raza A. m. mellifera originaria de Europa occidental. Las abejas obreras procedentes de España y Portugal, se han descrito como animales de color azabache, con pilosidad y tomento de tamaño mediano, y una probóscide bastante larga; encontrando algunos autores que los animales del sur tenían una pilosidad más corta y una probóscide más larga, que sus familiares procedentes del norte. En el presente trabajo hemos estudiado 34 muestras de abejas obreras procedentes de dos zonas de nuestra península (el sur de España y el centro de Portugal), y del Archipiélago de Madeira, para rastrear la existencia de posibles diferencias morfológicas. Los resultados muestran que los animales constituyen tres grupos morfológicos, identificables mediante un análisis canónico. Uno de ellos incluye a los procedentes del centro de Portugal, otro está formado por los oriundos de Córdoba, y el tercero está constituido por los procedentes de la isla de Madeira y de la Sierra de Cazorla

Biometric study of apis mellifera population from central Portugal and Madeira

Las abejas melíferas que habitan en la Península Ibérica han sido descritas tradicionalmente como pertenecientes a la raza Apis mellifera iberica. La raza iberica está constituida por animales de color oscuro y de un gran vigor, su comportamiento es algo nervioso y la enjambraz .n se considera como moderada. Desde un punto de vista morfológico, son pocos los trabajos en los que se han estudiado estos seres vivos, incluyendo la bibliografía existente descripciones más o menos extensas de los que habitan en la región mediterránea, Asturias y la Submeseta Norte. Si admitimos que diferentes condiciones climáticas han debido de tener efectos selectivos sobre las características de estos insectos, resulta muy interesante estudiar abejas procedentes de diferentes localizaciones, para conocer la variabilidad existente. En el presente trabajo hemos estudiado 16 caracteres morfológicos, en 18 muestras de abejas obreras oriundas del centro de Portugal y de la isla de Madeira. Los resultados indican que las abejas del centro de Portugal constituyen un grupo morfológico, en el que no se aprecian grandes diferencias entre las distintas localizaciones geográficas. Los animales procedentes de Madeira también forman un conjunto morfológico, en el que, cuando se estudia de forma conjunta con las muestras procedentes de Portugal, el análisis canónico muestra un solapamiento parcial de las poblaciones

Drug delivery nanosystems for the localized treatment of glioblastoma multiforme

[EN] Glioblastoma multiforme is one of the most prevalent and malignant forms of central nervous system tumors. The treatment of glioblastoma remains a great challenge due to its location in the intracranial space and the presence of the blood-brain tumor barrier. There is an urgent need to develop novel therapy approaches for this tumor, to improve the clinical outcomes, and to reduce the rate of recurrence and adverse effects associated with present options. The formulation of therapeutic agents in nanostructures is one of the most promising approaches to treat glioblastoma due to the increased availability at the target site, and the possibility to co-deliver a range of drugs and diagnostic agents. Moreover, the local administration of nanostructures presents significant additional advantages, since it overcomes blood-brain barrier penetration issues to reach higher concentrations of therapeutic agents in the tumor area with minimal side effects. In this paper, we aim to review the attempts to develop nanostructures as local drug delivery systems able to deliver multiple agents for both therapeutic and diagnostic functions for the management of glioblastoma.This research was funded by an Ussher start-up funding award (School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin) and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant agreement No. 708036.Nam, L.; Coll Merino, MC.; Erthal, L.; De La Torre-Paredes, C.; Serrano, D.; Martínez-Máñez, R.; Santos-Martinez, M.... (2018). Drug delivery nanosystems for the localized treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Materials. 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11050779S115Goodenberger, M. L., & Jenkins, R. B. (2012). Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genetics, 205(12), 613-621. doi:10.1016/j.cancergen.2012.10.009Louis, D. N., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Cavenee, W. K., Burger, P. C., Jouvet, A., … Kleihues, P. (2007). The 2007 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathologica, 114(2), 97-109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4Gutkin, A., Cohen, Z. R., & Peer, D. (2016). Harnessing nanomedicine for therapeutic intervention in glioblastoma. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 13(11), 1573-1582. doi:10.1080/17425247.2016.1200557Omuro, A. (2013). Glioblastoma and Other Malignant Gliomas. JAMA, 310(17), 1842. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.280319Wang, Y., & Jiang, T. (2013). Understanding high grade glioma: Molecular mechanism, therapy and comprehensive management. Cancer Letters, 331(2), 139-146. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2012.12.024Gallego, O. (2015). Nonsurgical treatment of recurrent glioblastoma. Current Oncology, 22(4), 273. doi:10.3747/co.22.2436Carlsson, S. K., Brothers, S. P., & Wahlestedt, C. (2014). Emerging treatment strategies for glioblastoma multiforme. EMBO Molecular Medicine, 6(11), 1359-1370. doi:10.15252/emmm.201302627Yamasaki, F., Kurisu, K., Satoh, K., Arita, K., Sugiyama, K., Ohtaki, M., … Thohar, M. A. (2005). Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Human Brain Tumors at MR Imaging. Radiology, 235(3), 985-991. doi:10.1148/radiol.2353031338Gupta, A., Young, R. J., Shah, A. D., Schweitzer, A. D., Graber, J. J., Shi, W., … Omuro, A. M. P. (2014). Pretreatment Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Perfusion in Glioblastoma: Prediction of EGFR Gene Amplification. Clinical Neuroradiology, 25(2), 143-150. doi:10.1007/s00062-014-0289-3Fakhoury, M. (2015). Drug delivery approaches for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, 44(6), 1365-1373. doi:10.3109/21691401.2015.1052467Štolc, S., Jakubíková, L., & Kukurová, I. (2011). Body distribution of 11C-methionine and 18FDG in rat measured by microPET. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 4(1). doi:10.2478/v10102-011-0010-1Galldiks, N., Dunkl, V., Kracht, L. W., Vollmar, S., Jacobs, A. H., Fink, G. R., & Schroeter, M. (2012). Volumetry of [11C]-Methionine Positron Emission Tomographic Uptake as a Prognostic Marker before Treatment of Patients with Malignant Glioma. Molecular Imaging, 11(6), 7290.2012.00022. doi:10.2310/7290.2012.00022Louis, D. N., Perry, A., Reifenberger, G., von Deimling, A., Figarella-Branger, D., Cavenee, W. K., … Ellison, D. W. (2016). The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathologica, 131(6), 803-820. doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1Martínez-Garcia, M., Álvarez-Linera, J., Carrato, C., Ley, L., Luque, R., Maldonado, X., … Gil-Gil, M. (2017). SEOM clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of glioblastoma (2017). Clinical and Translational Oncology, 20(1), 22-28. doi:10.1007/s12094-017-1763-6WILSON, C. B. (1964). Glioblastoma Multiforme. Archives of Neurology, 11(5), 562. doi:10.1001/archneur.1964.00460230112012Juratli, T. A., Schackert, G., & Krex, D. (2013). Current status of local therapy in malignant gliomas — A clinical review of three selected approaches. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 139(3), 341-358. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.05.003Westphal, M., Hilt, D. C., Bortey, E., Delavault, P., Olivares, R., Warnke, P. C., … Ram, Z. (2003). A phase 3 trial of local chemotherapy with biodegradable carmustine (BCNU) wafers (Gliadel wafers) in patients with primary malignant glioma. Neuro-Oncology, 5(2), 79-88. doi:10.1093/neuonc/5.2.79Chamberlain, M., Rhun, E., & Taillibert, S. (2015). The future of high-grade glioma: Where we are and where are we going. Surgical Neurology International, 6(2), 9. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.151331Stupp, R., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Weller, M., Fisher, B., Taphoorn, M. J. B., … Mirimanoff, R. O. (2005). Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 352(10), 987-996. doi:10.1056/nejmoa043330Lee, C. Y. (2017). Strategies of temozolomide in future glioblastoma treatment. OncoTargets and Therapy, Volume 10, 265-270. doi:10.2147/ott.s120662Mun, E. J., Babiker, H. M., Weinberg, U., Kirson, E. D., & Von Hoff, D. D. (2017). Tumor-Treating Fields: A Fourth Modality in Cancer Treatment. Clinical Cancer Research, 24(2), 266-275. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1117Stupp, R., Taillibert, S., Kanner, A., Kesari, S., Toms, S. A., Barnett, G. H., … Ram, Z. (2015). Tumor treating fields (TTFields): A novel treatment modality added to standard chemo- and radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma—First report of the full dataset of the EF14 randomized phase III trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(15_suppl), 2000-2000. doi:10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.2000Bernard-Arnoux, F., Lamure, M., Ducray, F., Aulagner, G., Honnorat, J., & Armoiry, X. (2016). The cost-effectiveness of tumor-treating fields therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology, 18(8), 1129-1136. doi:10.1093/neuonc/now102Stupp, R., Hegi, M. E., Mason, W. P., van den Bent, M. J., Taphoorn, M. J., Janzer, R. C., … Mirimanoff, R.-O. (2009). Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. The Lancet Oncology, 10(5), 459-466. doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70025-7Preusser, M., de Ribaupierre, S., Wöhrer, A., Erridge, S. C., Hegi, M., Weller, M., & Stupp, R. (2011). Current concepts and management of glioblastoma. Annals of Neurology, 70(1), 9-21. doi:10.1002/ana.22425FDA Grants Genentech’s Avastin Full Approval for Most Aggressive Form of Brain Cancerhttps://www.gene.com/media/press-releases/14695/2017-12-05/fda-grants-genentechs-avastin-full-approWick, W., Stupp, R., Gorlia, T., Bendszus, M., Sahm, F., Bromberg, J. E., … Van Den Bent, M. J. (2016). Phase II part of EORTC study 26101: The sequence of bevacizumab and lomustine in patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(15_suppl), 2019-2019. doi:10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.2019Liu, W.-Y., Wang, Z.-B., Zhang, L.-C., Wei, X., & Li, L. (2012). Tight Junction in Blood-Brain Barrier: An Overview of Structure, Regulation, and Regulator Substances. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 18(8), 609-615. doi:10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00340.xRonaldson, P. T., & Davis, T. P. (2011). Targeting blood–brain barrier changes during inflammatory pain: an opportunity for optimizing CNS drug delivery. Therapeutic Delivery, 2(8), 1015-1041. doi:10.4155/tde.11.67S. Hersh, D., S. Wadajkar, A., B. Roberts, N., G. Perez, J., P. Connolly, N., Frenkel, V., … J. Kim, A. (2016). Evolving Drug Delivery Strategies to Overcome the Blood Brain Barrier. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 22(9), 1177-1193. doi:10.2174/1381612822666151221150733Patel, M. M., Goyal, B. R., Bhadada, S. V., Bhatt, J. S., & Amin, A. F. (2009). Getting into the Brain. CNS Drugs, 23(1), 35-58. doi:10.2165/0023210-200923010-00003Clark, D. E. (2003). In silico prediction of blood–brain barrier permeation. Drug Discovery Today, 8(20), 927-933. doi:10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02827-7Gleeson, M. P. (2008). Generation of a Set of Simple, Interpretable ADMET Rules of Thumb. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 51(4), 817-834. doi:10.1021/jm701122qHervé, F., Ghinea, N., & Scherrmann, J.-M. (2008). CNS Delivery Via Adsorptive Transcytosis. The AAPS Journal, 10(3), 455-472. doi:10.1208/s12248-008-9055-2Van Tellingen, O., Yetkin-Arik, B., de Gooijer, M. C., Wesseling, P., Wurdinger, T., & de Vries, H. E. (2015). Overcoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment. Drug Resistance Updates, 19, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2015.02.002Ostermann, S. (2004). Plasma and Cerebrospinal Fluid Population Pharmacokinetics of Temozolomide in Malignant Glioma Patients. Clinical Cancer Research, 10(11), 3728-3736. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-03-0807Laquintana, V., Trapani, A., Denora, N., Wang, F., Gallo, J. M., & Trapani, G. (2009). New strategies to deliver anticancer drugs to brain tumors. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 6(10), 1017-1032. doi:10.1517/17425240903167942Zhan, C., Gu, B., Xie, C., Li, J., Liu, Y., & Lu, W. (2010). Cyclic RGD conjugated poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(lactic acid) micelle enhances paclitaxel anti-glioblastoma effect. Journal of Controlled Release, 143(1), 136-142. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.12.020Kondo, Y., Kondo, S., Tanaka, Y., Haqqi, T., Barna, B. P., & Cowell, J. K. (1998). Inhibition of telomerase increases the susceptibility of human malignant glioblastoma cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. Oncogene, 16(17), 2243-2248. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1201754Wang, P. P., Frazier, J., & Brem, H. (2002). Local drug delivery to the brain. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 54(7), 987-1013. doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(02)00054-6De Souza, R., Zahedi, P., Allen, C. J., & Piquette-Miller, M. (2010). Polymeric drug delivery systems for localized cancer chemotherapy. Drug Delivery, 17(6), 365-375. doi:10.3109/10717541003762854Wolinsky, J. B., Colson, Y. L., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2012). Local drug delivery strategies for cancer treatment: Gels, nanoparticles, polymeric films, rods, and wafers. Journal of Controlled Release, 159(1), 14-26. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.11.031Chakroun, R. W., Zhang, P., Lin, R., Schiapparelli, P., Quinones-Hinojosa, A., & Cui, H. (2017). Nanotherapeutic systems for local treatment of brain tumors. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, 10(1), e1479. doi:10.1002/wnan.1479Mathios, D., Kim, J. E., Mangraviti, A., Phallen, J., Park, C.-K., Jackson, C. M., … Lim, M. (2016). Anti-PD-1 antitumor immunity is enhanced by local and abrogated by systemic chemotherapy in GBM. Science Translational Medicine, 8(370), 370ra180-370ra180. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aag2942Chaichana, K. L., Pinheiro, L., & Brem, H. (2015). Delivery of local therapeutics to the brain: working toward advancing treatment for malignant gliomas. Therapeutic Delivery, 6(3), 353-369. doi:10.4155/tde.14.114Patchell, R. A., Regine, W. F., Ashton, P., Tibbs, P. A., Wilson, D., Shappley, D., & Young, B. (2002). Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 60(1), 37-42. doi:10.1023/a:1020291229317Hassenbusch, S. J., Nardone, E. M., Levin, V. A., Leeds, N., & Pietronigro, D. (2003). Stereotactic Injection of DTI-015 into Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Phase I/II Trial. Neoplasia, 5(1), 9-16. doi:10.1016/s1476-5586(03)80012-xBoiardi, A., Eoli, M., Salmaggi, A., Zappacosta, B., Fariselli, L., Milanesi, I., … Silvani, A. (2001). Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 54(1), 39-47. doi:10.1023/a:1012510513780Lidar, Z., Mardor, Y., Jonas, T., Pfeffer, R., Faibel, M., Nass, D., … Ram, Z. (2004). Convection-enhanced delivery of paclitaxel for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: a Phase I/II clinical study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 100(3), 472-479. doi:10.3171/jns.2004.100.3.0472Bruce, J. N., Fine, R. L., Canoll, P., Yun, J., Kennedy, B. C., Rosenfeld, S. S., … DeLaPaz, R. L. (2011). Regression of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas With Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Topotecan. Neurosurgery, 69(6), 1272-1280. doi:10.1227/neu.0b013e3182233e24Carpentier, A., Metellus, P., Ursu, R., Zohar, S., Lafitte, F., Barrie, M., … Carpentier, A. F. (2010). Intracerebral administration of CpG oligonucleotide for patients with recurrent glioblastoma: a phase II study. Neuro-Oncology, 12(4), 401-408. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nop047Bogdahn, U., Hau, P., Stockhammer, G., Venkataramana, N. K., Mahapatra, A. K., … Suri, A. (2010). Targeted therapy for high-grade glioma with the TGF- 2 inhibitor trabedersen: results of a randomized and controlled phase IIb study. Neuro-Oncology, 13(1), 132-142. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq142Iwamoto, F. M., Lamborn, K. R., Robins, H. I., Mehta, M. P., Chang, S. M., Butowski, N. A., … Fine, H. A. (2010). Phase II trial of pazopanib (GW786034), an oral multi-targeted angiogenesis inhibitor, for adults with recurrent glioblastoma (North American Brain Tumor Consortium Study 06-02). Neuro-Oncology, 12(8), 855-861. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noq025Brem, S., Tyler, B., Li, K., Pradilla, G., Legnani, F., Caplan, J., & Brem, H. (2007). Local delivery of temozolomide by biodegradable polymers is superior to oral administration in a rodent glioma model. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 60(5), 643-650. doi:10.1007/s00280-006-0407-2Recinos, V. R., Tyler, B. M., Bekelis, K., Sunshine, S. B., Vellimana, A., Li, K. W., & Brem, H. (2010). Combination of Intracranial Temozolomide With Intracranial Carmustine Improves Survival When Compared With Either Treatment Alone in a Rodent Glioma Model. Neurosurgery, 66(3), 530-537. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000365263.14725.39Storm, P. B., Moriarity, J. L., Tyler, B., Burger, P. C., Brem, H., & Weingart, J. (2002). Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 56(3), 209-217. doi:10.1023/a:1015003232713Scott, A. W., Tyler, B. M., Masi, B. C., Upadhyay, U. M., Patta, Y. R., Grossman, R., … Cima, M. J. (2011). Intracranial microcapsule drug delivery device for the treatment of an experimental gliosarcoma model. Biomaterials, 32(10), 2532-2539. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.12.020Kim, G. Y., Tyler, B. M., Tupper, M. M., Karp, J. M., Langer, R. S., Brem, H., & Cima, M. J. (2007). Resorbable polymer microchips releasing BCNU inhibit tumor growth in the rat 9L flank model. Journal of Controlled Release, 123(2), 172-178. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2007.08.003Masi, B. C., Tyler, B. M., Bow, H., Wicks, R. T., Xue, Y., Brem, H., … Cima, M. J. (2012). Intracranial MEMS based temozolomide delivery in a 9L rat gliosarcoma model. Biomaterials, 33(23), 5768-5775. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.048Li, X., Tsibouklis, J., Weng, T., Zhang, B., Yin, G., Feng, G., … Mikhalovsky, S. V. (2016). Nano carriers for drug transport across the blood–brain barrier. Journal of Drug Targeting, 25(1), 17-28. doi:10.1080/1061186x.2016.1184272Mangraviti, A., Gullotti, D., Tyler, B., & Brem, H. (2016). Nanobiotechnology-based delivery strategies: New frontiers in brain tumor targeted therapies. Journal of Controlled Release, 240, 443-453. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.03.031Torchilin, V. P. (2009). Passive and Active Drug Targeting: Drug Delivery to Tumors as an Example. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, 3-53. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00477-3_1Rippe, B., Rosengren, B.-I., Carlsson, O., & Venturoli, D. (2002). Transendothelial Transport: The Vesicle Controversy. Journal of Vascular Research, 39(5), 375-390. doi:10.1159/000064521Hobbs, S. K., Monsky, W. L., Yuan, F., Roberts, W. G., Griffith, L., Torchilin, V. P., & Jain, R. K. (1998). Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: Role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(8), 4607-4612. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.8.4607Lammers, T., Kiessling, F., Hennink, W. E., & Storm, G. (2012). Drug targeting to tumors: Principles, pitfalls and (pre-) clinical progress. Journal of Controlled Release, 161(2), 175-187. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.09.063Danhier, F. (2016). To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine? Journal of Controlled Release, 244, 108-121. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.11.015Petros, R. A., & DeSimone, J. M. (2010). Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9(8), 615-627. doi:10.1038/nrd2591Chouly, C., Pouliquen, D., Lucet, I., Jeune, J. J., & Jallet, P. (1996). Development of superparamagnetic nanoparticles for MRI: effect of particle size, charge and surface nature on biodistribution. Journal of Microencapsulation, 13(3), 245-255. doi:10.3109/02652049609026013OWENSIII, D., & PEPPAS, N. (2006). Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 307(1), 93-102. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2005.10.010Salvador-Morales, C., Zhang, L., Langer, R., & Farokhzad, O. C. (2009). Immunocompatibility properties of lipid–polymer hybrid nanoparticles with heterogeneous surface functional groups. Biomaterials, 30(12), 2231-2240. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.005Zhan, C., & Lu, W. (2012). The Blood-Brain/Tumor Barriers: Challenges and Chances for Malignant Gliomas Targeted Drug Delivery. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 13(12), 2380-2387. doi:10.2174/138920112803341798Steiniger, S. C. J., Kreuter, J., Khalansky, A. S., Skidan, I. N., Bobruskin, A. I., Smirnova, Z. S., … Gelperina, S. E. (2004). Chemotherapy of glioblastoma in rats using doxorubicin-loaded nanoparticles. International Journal of Cancer, 109(5), 759-767. doi:10.1002/ijc.20048Wohlfart, S., Khalansky, A. S., Bernreuther, C., Michaelis, M., Cinatl, J., Glatzel, M., & Kreuter, J. (2011). Treatment of glioblastoma with poly(isohexyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 415(1-2), 244-251. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.05.046Zanotto-Filho, A., Coradini, K., Braganhol, E., Schröder, R., de Oliveira, C. M., Simões-Pires, A., … Moreira, J. C. F. (2013). Curcumin-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules as a strategy to improve pharmacological efficacy of curcumin in glioma treatment. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, 83(2), 156-167. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.10.019Gao, H. (2016). Perspectives on Dual Targeting Delivery Systems for Brain Tumors. Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, 12(1), 6-16. doi:10.1007/s11481-016-9687-4Pinto, M. P., Arce, M., Yameen, B., & Vilos, C. (2017). Targeted brain delivery nanoparticles for malignant gliomas. Nanomedicine, 12(1), 59-72. doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-0307Fang, C., Wang, K., Stephen, Z. R., Mu, Q., Kievit, F. M., Chiu, D. T., … Zhang, M. (2015). Temozolomide Nanoparticles for Targeted Glioblastoma Therapy. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 7(12), 6674-6682. doi:10.1021/am5092165Ke, W., Shao, K., Huang, R., Han, L., Liu, Y., Li, J., … Jiang, C. (2009). Gene delivery targeted to the brain using an Angiopep-conjugated polyethyleneglycol-modified polyamidoamine dendrimer. Biomaterials, 30(36), 6976-6985. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.08.049Xin, H., Jiang, X., Gu, J., Sha, X., Chen, L., Law, K., … Fang, X. (2011). Angiopep-conjugated poly(ethylene glycol)-co-poly(ε-caprolactone) nanoparticles as dual-targeting drug delivery system for brain glioma. Biomaterials, 32(18), 4293-4305. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.02.044Zhang, B., Wang, H., Liao, Z., Wang, Y., Hu, Y., Yang, J., … Jiang, X. (2014). EGFP–EGF1-conjugated nanoparticles for targeting both neovascular and glioma cells in therapy of brain glioma. Biomaterials, 35(13), 4133-4145. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.071Zhang, P., Hu, L., Yin, Q., Feng, L., & Li, Y. (2012). Transferrin-Modified c[RGDfK]-Paclitaxel Loaded Hybrid Micelle for Sequential Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration and Glioma Targeting Therapy. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 9(6), 1590-1598. doi:10.1021/mp200600tMa, D. (2014). Enhancing endosomal escape for nanoparticle mediated siRNA delivery. Nanoscale, 6(12), 6415. doi:10.1039/c4nr00018hShim, M. S., & Kwon, Y. J. (2012). Stimuli-responsive polymers and nanomaterials for gene delivery and imaging applications. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 64(11), 1046-1059. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.018Zarebkohan, A., Najafi, F., Moghimi, H. R., Hemmati, M., Deevband, M. R., & Kazemi, B. (2015). Synthesis and characterization of a PAMAM dendrimer nanocarrier functionalized by SRL peptide for targeted gene delivery to the brain. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 78, 19-30. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2015.06.024Hynynen, K., McDannold, N., Vykhodtseva, N., & Jolesz, F. A. (2001). Noninvasive MR Imaging–guided Focal Opening of the Blood-Brain Barrier in Rabbits. Radiology, 220(3), 640-646. doi:10.1148/radiol.2202001804Nance, E., Timbie, K., Miller, G. W., Song, J., Louttit, C., Klibanov, A. L., … Price, R. J. (2014). Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-penetrating nanoparticles across the blood − brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Journal of Controlled Release, 189, 123-132. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.031Mead,

Synergistic effect of Si-hydroxyapatite coating and VEGF adsorption on Ti6Al4V-ELI scaffolds for bone regeneration in an osteoporotic bone environment

The osteogenic and angiogenic responses to metal macroporous scaffolds coated with silicon substituted hydroxyapatite (SiHA) and decorated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Ti6Al4V-ELI scaffolds were prepared by electron beam melting and subsequently coated with Ca-10(PO4)(5.6)(SRO4)(0.4)(OH)(1.6) following a dip coating method. In vitro studies demonstrated that SiHA stimulates the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblastic cells, whereas the adsorption of VEGF stimulates the proliferation of EC2 mature endothelial cells. In vivo studies were carried out in an osteoporotic sheep model, evidencing that only the simultaneous presence of both components led to a significant increase of new tissue formation in osteoporotic bone.MINECO (MAT2015-64831-R, MAT2016-75611-R AEI/FEDER, UE y BI02015-66266-R) Institute de Salud Carlos III (RD12-0019-0032) European Research Council (Advanced Grant VERDI; ERC-2015-AdG Proposal 694160

Follow-up of loci from the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Disease Project identifies TRIP4 as a novel susceptibility gene

To follow-up loci discovered by the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Disease Project, we attempted independent replication of 19 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a large Spanish sample (Fundació ACE data set; 1808 patients and 2564 controls). Our results corroborate association with four SNPs located in the genes INPP5D, MEF2C, ZCWPW1 and FERMT2, respectively. Of these, ZCWPW1 was the only SNP to withstand correction for multiple testing (P=0.000655). Furthermore, we identify TRIP4 (rs74615166) as a novel genome-wide significant locus for Alzheimer's disease risk (odds ratio=1.31; confidence interval 95% (1.19-1.44); P=9.74 × 10 - 9)

Revista de Vertebrados de la Estación Biológica de Doñana

Clave preliminar de las escamas de los peces de agua dulce de España, a nivel de familiaExito reproductor del Buitre leonado (Gyps fulvus) en NavarraAlimentación del Gavilán (Accipiter nisus) en la Isla de TenerifeEl Verdecillo (Serinus serinus): Tendencias en la estación de nidificación, en el tamaño del huevo y en la supervivencia.las batidas como método de censo en especiesde caza mayor: aplicación al caso del Jabalí (Sus scrofa L.) en la provincia de Burgos (Norte de España)La adquisición de madurez sexual en el camaleón común (Chamaeleo chamaeleon)Nuevas citas de Hemidactylus turcicus en la provincia de CáceresLa focha común (Fulica atra) en la isla de Gran Canaria: nueva especie nidificante en el archipiélago CanarioTraslado de huevos en incubación por la urraca (Pica pica)Predación de Falco peregrinus sobre Oryctolagus cuniculusCuatro nuevas especies de aves para Bolivia.Sobre la utilización de nidos de golondrina común abandonados.Parasitismo múltiple del críalo (Clamator glandarius)Predación del topo de rio (Galemys pyrenaicus, Geoffroy 1811) por parte de la lechuza común (Tyto alba, Scopoli 1769)Predación del zorro (Vulpes vulpes) sobre un pollo de buitre leonado (Gyps fulvus).Vulpes vulpes L. criando en una colonia de marmota (Marmota marmota L.) en el pirineo de LéridaObservaciones sobre la incidencia de Rattus (Fischer, 1803) en los cultivos ibéricos de caña de azúcaSituación actual de la jutiita de la tierra Capromys sanfelipensis (Rodentia, Mammalia)Notas sobre la intraducción y expansión de la ardilla común en Sierra Nevada, sureste de EspañaPeer reviewe

X chromosome inactivation does not necessarily determine the severity of the phenotype in Rett syndrome patients

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurological disorder usually caused by mutations in the MECP2 gene. Since the MECP2 gene is located on the X chromosome, X chromosome inactivation (XCI) could play a role in the wide range of phenotypic variation of RTT patients; however, classical methylation-based protocols to evaluate XCI could not determine whether the preferentially inactivated X chromosome carried the mutant or the wild-type allele. Therefore, we developed an allele-specific methylation-based assay to evaluate methylation at the loci of several recurrent MECP2 mutations. We analyzed the XCI patterns in the blood of 174 RTT patients, but we did not find a clear correlation between XCI and the clinical presentation. We also compared XCI in blood and brain cortex samples of two patients and found differences between XCI patterns in these tissues. However, RTT mainly being a neurological disease complicates the establishment of a correlation between the XCI in blood and the clinical presentation of the patients. Furthermore, we analyzed MECP2 transcript levels and found differences from the expected levels according to XCI. Many factors other than XCI could affect the RTT phenotype, which in combination could influence the clinical presentation of RTT patients to a greater extent than slight variations in the XCI pattern