Severe depression more common in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ than early-stage invasive breast cancer patients

textabstractPurpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with an excellent prognosis; historical studies have shown similar levels of psychological distress in patients with DCIS and with early-stage invasive breast cancer (early-IBC). It is suggested that these results might have led to better patient education about prognosis after DCIS. This study reports the current levels of anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in DCIS and early-IBC patients. Methods: DCIS (n = 89) and early-IBC patients, T1-2N0, (n = 361) were selected from the UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort. Patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected before the start of adjuvant radiotherapy (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. Mixed models were used to compare differences in levels of anxiety, depression, and HRQoL between DCIS and early-IBC patients. Results: DCIS and early-IBC patients reported similar levels of anxiety, which were highest at baseline. Depression scores were comparable between groups, also after stratification by use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The proportion of patients reporting high-risk depression scores (i.e., Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sale score >8) was significantly higher among patients with DCIS at 6, 12 and 18 months, and this proportion increased over the first 18 months. Health-related quality of life was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: Severe depression scores are more common in DCIS patients, despite their excellent prognosis. These results suggest that further improvement of patient education and effective patient doctor communication about the prognostic differences between patients with DCIS and invasive breast cancer is still highly needed

Severe depression more common in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ than early-stage invasive breast cancer patients

PURPOSE: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with an excellent prognosis; historical studies have shown similar levels of psychological distress in patients with DCIS and with early-stage invasive breast cancer (early-IBC). It is suggested that these results might have led to better patient education about prognosis after DCIS. This study reports the current levels of anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in DCIS and early-IBC patients. METHODS: DCIS (n = 89) and early-IBC patients, T1-2N0, (n = 361) were selected from the UMBRELLA breast cancer cohort. Patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected before the start of adjuvant radiotherapy (baseline) and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. Mixed models were used to compare differences in levels of anxiety, depression, and HRQoL between DCIS and early-IBC patients. RESULTS: DCIS and early-IBC patients reported similar levels of anxiety, which were highest at baseline. Depression scores were comparable between groups, also after stratification by use of adjuvant chemotherapy. The proportion of patients reporting high-risk depression scores (i.e., Hospital Anxiety and Depression Sale score >8) was significantly higher among patients with DCIS at 6, 12 and 18 months, and this proportion increased over the first 18 months. Health-related quality of life was comparable between both groups. CONCLUSION: Severe depression scores are more common in DCIS patients, despite their excellent prognosis. These results suggest that further improvement of patient education and effective patient doctor communication about the prognostic differences between patients with DCIS and invasive breast cancer is still highly needed

Coronary artery calcifications on breast cancer radiotherapy planning CT scans and cardiovascular risk: What do patients want to know?

Background: Coronary artery calcifications (CAC) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which can be automatically quantified on routine breast radiotherapy planning computed tomography (CT) scans. Around 8% of patients have (very) high CAC scores and corresponding increased risks of CVD. Aim: This study explores whether, how, and under what conditions women with breast cancer want to be informed about their CAC-based CVD risk. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in a random sample of UMBRELLA, a prospective breast cancer cohort. Participants (n = 79) filled out a questionnaire about their knowledge on the CVD risk following breast cancer, their interest in being informed about their CVD risk based on CAC score, and preferences on how they would want to receive this information. Results: Most participants (66%) were not aware that the presence of CAC indicates an increased CVD risk. Participants indicated that they were not or only slightly aware of the risk of treatment-induced cardiotoxicity (48%), and that the risk of cardiotoxicity was higher in patients with pre-existing CVD risk factors (82%). The vast majority (90%) indicated that they want to be informed about in increased CAC-based CVD risk. Conclusions: The majority of patients with breast cancer wants to be informed about their CAC-based CVD risk. With the majority of patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy, and with low cost and automated options for accurate CAC measurement in planning CT scans, it is important to develop strategies to manage patients with an increased CAC-based risk of CVD

Development and Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module.

BACKGROUND: In breast cancer surgery, patient-reported outcome measures are needed to measure outcomes best reported by patients (e.g., psychosocial well-being). This study aimed to develop and validate a new BREAST-Q module to address the unique concerns of patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT). METHODS: Phase 1 involved qualitative and cognitive interviews with women who had BCT and clinical expert input to establish content for the BCT module. A field-test (phase 2) was performed, and Rasch measurement theory (RMT) analysis was used for item reduction and examination of reliability and validity. Validation of the item-reduced scales in a clinical sample (phase 3) was conducted for further assessment of their psychometric properties. RESULTS: Qualitative interviews with 24 women resulted in the addition of 15 new items across multiple existing BREAST-Q scales and the development of two new scales (Adverse Effects of Radiation and Satisfaction With Information-Radiation Therapy). Feedback from 15 patients and 5 clinical experts were used to refine the instructions, response options, and item wording. An RMT analysis of data from 3497 women resulted in item reduction. The final set of scales showed evidence of ordered response option thresholds, good item fit, and good reliability, except for the Adverse Effects of the Radiation Scale. Validity and reliability were further supported by the phase 3 data from 3125 women. CONCLUSIONS: The BREAST-Q BCT module can be used in research and clinical care to evaluate quality metrics and to compare surgical outcomes across all breast cancer surgery patients

Self-reported work ability in breast cancer survivors; a prospective cohort study in the Netherlands

Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported work ability of breast cancer patients, to compare scores with the Dutch general population, and to identify determinants of reduced work ability in breast cancer patients. Methods: In a prospective cohort study, we identified 939 patients <67 years. Employed patients filled out the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire before the start of radiotherapy treatment (baseline) and at 6, 18, and 30 months. Work ability was compared with a matched Dutch cancer-free population (n=3,641). The association between (clinical) characteristics and work ability over time was assessed using mixed-effects models. Results: At baseline, 68% (n=641) of the respondents were employed and 64% (n=203) were employed at 30 months. Moderate or poor work ability was reported by 71% of patients at baseline, by 24% of the patients at 30 months and by 14% of the general population. Axillary lymph node dissection, (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and locoregional radiotherapy were associated with reduced work ability. After 30 months, 18% of employed patients reported to have reduced their working hours, made substantial modifications to their work or were unable to work. Conclusion: Patient-reported work ability is strongly reduced during breast cancer treatment. Thirty months after treatment the proportion of women reporting poor or moderate work ability remains higher compared to the general population. Even though the proportion of women with paid employment is rather stable over time, substantial amendments in work are needed in 18% of patients. These findings emphasize the importance of informing patients on potential changes in work ability to allow shared decision making