25,828 research outputs found
Quitting in Protest: A Theory of Presidential Policy Making and Agency Response
This paper examines the effects of centralized presidential policy-making, implemented through unilateral executive action, on the willingness of bureaucrats to exert effort and stay in the government. Extending models in organizational economics, we show that policy initiative by the president is a substitute for initiative by civil servants. Yet, total effort is enhanced when both work. Presidential centralization of policy often impels policy-oriented bureaucrats ( zealots ) to quit rather than implement presidential policies they dislike. Those most likely to quit are a range of moderate bureaucrats. More extreme bureaucrats may be willing to wait out an opposition president in the hope of tempering future policy when an allied president is elected. As control of the White House alternates between ideologically opposed extreme presidents, policy-minded moderates are stripped from bureaucratic agencies leaving only policy extremists or poorly performing slackers. These departures degrade policy initiative in moderate agencies
Public Sector Personnel Economics: Wages, Promotions, and the Competence-Control Trade-off
We model personnel policies in public agencies, examining how wages and promotion standards can partially offset a fundamental contracting problem: the inability of public sector workers to contract on performance, and the inability of political masters to contract on forbearance from meddling. Despite the dual contracting problem, properly constructed personnel policies can encourage intrinsically motivated public sector employees to invest in expertise, seek promotion, remain in the public sector, and develop policy projects. However, doing so requires internal personnel policies that sort slackers from zealots. Personnel policies that accomplish this task are quite different in agencies where acquired expertise has little value in the private sector, and agencies where acquired expertise commands a premium in the private sector. Finally, even with well-designed personnel policies, there remains an inescapable trade-off between political control and expertise acquisition
Double-averaged velocity and stress distributions for hydraulically-smooth and transitionally-rough turbulent flows
Peer reviewedPreprin
Formation of Kuiper Belt Binaries
The discovery that a substantial fraction of Kuiper Belt objects (KBOs)
exists in binaries with wide separations and roughly equal masses, has
motivated a variety of new theories explaining their formation. Goldreich et
al. (2002) proposed two formation scenarios: In the first, a transient binary
is formed, which becomes bound with the aid of dynamical friction from the sea
of small bodies (L^2s mechanism); in the second, a binary is formed by three
body gravitational deflection (L^3 mechanism). Here, we accurately calculate
the L^2s and L^3 formation rates for sub-Hill velocities. While the L^2s
formation rate is close to previous order of magnitude estimates, the L^3
formation rate is about a factor of 4 smaller. For sub-Hill KBO velocities (v
<< v_H) the ratio of the L^3 to the L^2s formation rate is 0.05 (v/v_H)
independent of the small bodies' velocity dispersion, their surface density or
their mutual collisions. For Super-Hill velocities (v >> v_H) the L^3 mechanism
dominates over the L^2s mechanism. Binary formation via the L^3 mechanism
competes with binary destruction by passing bodies. Given sufficient time, a
statistical equilibrium abundance of binaries forms. We show that the frequency
of long-lived transient binaries drops exponentially with the system's lifetime
and that such transient binaries are not important for binary formation via the
L^3 mechanism, contrary to Lee et al. (2007). For the L^2s mechanism we find
that the typical time, transient binaries must last, to form Kuiper Belt
binaries (KBBs) for a given strength of dynamical friction, D, increases only
logarithmically with D. Longevity of transient binaries only becomes important
for very weak dynamical friction (i.e. D \lesssim 0.002) and is most likely not
crucial for KBB formation.Comment: 20 pages, 3 figures, Accepted for publication in ApJ, correction of
minor typo
- …