On the transport and landfall of marine oil spills, laboratory and field observations

The dynamics of crude oil and different surface ocean drifters were compared to study the physical processes that govern the transport and landfall of marine oil spills. In a wave-tank experiment, drifters with drogue did not follow oil slicks. However, patches of undrogued drifters and thin bamboo plates did spread at the same rate and in the same direction as the crude oil slicks. Then, the trajectories of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and 1300 drifters released near the spill source were investigated. Undrogued drifters were transported twice as fast as drogued drifters across the isobaths. 25% of the undrogued drifters landed, versus about 5% of the drogued ones, for the most part, on the same coastline locations where oil was found after Deepwater Horizon. Results highlight the importance of near surface gradients in controlling the cross-shelf transport and landing of surface material on the Gulf of Mexico's northern shores. •Undrogued drifters and crude oil slicks advect and disperse similarly in waves.•Undrogued drifters make landfall 5 times more than near-surface drogued drifters.•Near-surface vertical shear sets the cross-shelf transport of surface material

Direct coupling of near-field and far-field models hones predictions of oil spill transport and fate from deep-sea blowout

Deep-water spills pose a unique challenge for reliable predictions of oil transport and fate, since live oil spewing out under very high hydrostatic pressure has characteristics remarkably distinct from oil spilling in shallow water. It is thus important to describe the complex thermodynamic processes occurring in the near-field, meters above the wellhead, and the hydrodynamic processes in the far field, up to kilometers away. However, these processes are typically modeled separately since they occur at different scales. Here we directly couple two oil prediction applications developed during the Deepwater Horizon blowout operating at different scales: the near-field Texas A&M Oilspill Calculator (TAMOC) and the far field oil application of the Connectivity Modeling System (oil-CMS). To achieve this coupling, new oil-CMS modules were developed to read TAMOC output, which consists of the description of distinct oil droplet “types”, each of specific size and pseudo-component mixture that enters at a given mass flow rate, time and position into the far field. These variables are transformed for use in the individual-based framework of oil-CMS, where each droplet type fits into a droplet size distribution (DSD). Here we used 19 pseudo-components representing a large range of hydrocarbon compounds and their respective thermodynamic properties. Simulation results show that the dispersion pathway for different droplet types varies significantly. Indeed, some droplet types are predicted to remain suspended in the subsea over months, while others accumulate in the surface layers. In addition, the biodegradation and dissolution rates of oil pseudo-components significantly alter the dispersion, denoting the importance of more biodegradation and dissolution studies of dispersed live oil at high pressure, with and without subsea dispersant injection (SSDI). This new modeling tool shows the potential for improved accuracy in predictions of oil partition in the water column, and of advancing impact assessment and response during a deep water spills

Petroleum Dynamics in the Sea and Influence of Subsea Dispersant Injection during \u3cem\u3eDeewater Horizon\u3c/em\u3e

During the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a substantial fraction of the 600,000-900,000 tons of released petroleum liquid and natural gas became entrapped below the sea surface, but the quantity entrapped and the sequestration mechanisms have remained unclear. We modeled the buoyant jet of petroleum liquid droplets, gas bubbles, and entrained seawater, using 279 simulated chemical components, for a representative day (June 8, 2010) of the period after the sunken platform\u27s riser pipe was pared at the wellhead (June 4-July 15). The model predicts that 27% of the released mass of petroleum fluids dissolved into the sea during ascent from the pared wellhead (1,505 m depth) to the sea surface, thereby matching observed volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions to the atmosphere. Based on combined results from model simulation and water column measurements, 24% of released petroleum fluid mass became channeled into a stable deep-water intrusion at 900- to 1,300-m depth, as aqueously dissolved compounds (∼23%) and suspended petroleum liquid microdroplets (∼0.8%). Dispersant injection at the wellhead decreased the median initial diameters of simulated petroleum liquid droplets and gas bubbles by 3.2-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively, which increased dissolution of ascending petroleum fluids by 25%. Faster dissolution increased the simulated flows of water-soluble compounds into biologically sparse deep water by 55%, while decreasing the flows of several harmful compounds into biologically rich surface water. Dispersant injection also decreased the simulated emissions of VOCs to the atmosphere by 28%, including a 2,000-fold decrease in emissions of benzene, which lowered health risks for response workers

Intercomparison of Oil Spill Prediction Models for Accidental Blowout Scenarios with and without Subsea Chemical Dispersant Injection

We compare oil spill model predictions for a prototype subsea blowout with and without subsea injection of chemical dispersants in deep and shallow water, for high and low gas-oil ratio, and in weak to strong crossflows. Model results are compared for initial oil droplet size distribution, the nearfield plume, and the farfield Lagrangian particle tracking stage of hydrocarbon transport. For the conditions tested (a blowout with oil flow rate of 20,000 bbl/d, about 1/3 of the Deepwater Horizon), the models predict the volume median droplet diameter at the source to range from 0.3 to 6mm without dispersant and 0.01 to 0.8 mm with dispersant. This reduced droplet size owing to reduced interfacial tension results in a one to two order of magnitude increase in the downstream displacement of the initial oil surfacing zone and may lead to a significant fraction of the spilled oil not reaching the sea surface