10 research outputs found

    How is spinal range of motion affected by disc- and facet degeneration and spinopelvic anatomy

    Full text link
    Background: We aimed to investigate how disc- and facet joint degeneration relate to ROM and spinopelvic alignment parameters. Their interrelation, however, is not yet understood, although eminent in patient specific modeling approaches and surgical decision making. Further is not yet sufficiently understood whether spinal alignment parameters relate to the degenerative states. Methods: The ROM of lumbar spinal segments was quantified using flexion/extension radiographs of 90 patients. The grades of degeneration of discs (IDD, Pfirrmann grades, n=440) and facet joints (FJD, Weishaupt classification, n=406) were assessed in CT and MRI scans. Results: The grade of IDD was significantly related to changes in ROM (p<0.01) whereas no association was observed with the amount of FJD. Grade V IDD was associated with a significant decrease in motion (p<0.01) compared to all other IDD grades (II-IV), which did not differ significantly among each other. The combined occurrence of IDD and FJD revealed the largest angular segmental ROM in segments with the lowest IDD (II) and lowest FJD (0). The lowermost ROM was present in fused segments (control), followed by those with severe IDD (V). In combination with FJD, the destabilizing effect of initial IDD was only observed if FJD was already in an advanced state. Conclusions: While the degree of facet joint degeneration seems not significantly associated with limitations in spinal motion, severe lumbar disc degeneration limits segmental motion, nearly equal to spinal fusion. This should affect counseling patients undergoing spinal fusion with questions on the probability of adjacent segment degeneration compared to the natural course. Keywords: Degenerative Disease; Facet Joint Degeneration; Facet Joint Osteoarthritis; Intervertebral Disc Degeneration; Kinematics; Sagittal Alignment

    Bone density optimized pedicle screw instrumentation improves screw pull-out force in lumbar vertebrae

    No full text
    Pedicle screw instrumentation is performed in the surgical treatment of a wide variety of spinal pathologies. A common postoperative complication associated with this procedure is screw loosening. It has been shown that patient-specific screw fixation can be automated to match standard clinical practice and that failure can be estimated preoperatively using computed tomography images. Hence, we set out to optimize three-dimensional preoperative planning to achieve more mechanically robust screw purchase allowing deviation from intuitive, standard screw parameters. Toward this purpose, we employed a genetic algorithm optimization to find optimal screw sizes and trajectories by maximizing the CT derived bone mechanical properties. The method was tested on cadaveric lumbar vertebrae (L1 to L5) of four human spines (2 female/2 male; age range 60-78 years). The main boundary conditions were the predefined, level-dependent areas of possible screw entry points, as well as the automatically located pedicle structures. Finite element analysis was used to compare the genetic algorithm output to standard clinical planning of screw positioning in terms of the simulated pull-out strength. The genetic algorithm optimization successfully found screw sizes and trajectories that maximize the sum of the Young's modulus within the screw's volume for all 40 pedicle screws included in this study. Overall, there was a 26% increase in simulated pull-out strength for optimized compared to traditional screw trajectories and sizes. Our results indicate that optimizing pedicle screw instrumentation in lumbar vertebrae based on bone quality measures improves screw purchase as compared to traditional instrumentation.ISSN:1025-5842ISSN:1476-825
    corecore