32 research outputs found

    Head motion measurement and correction using FID navigators.

    No full text
    To develop a novel framework for rapid, intrinsic head motion measurement in MRI using FID navigators (FIDnavs) from a multichannel head coil array. FIDnavs encode substantial rigid-body motion information; however, current implementations require patient-specific training with external tracking data to extract quantitative positional changes. In this work, a forward model of FIDnav signals was calibrated using simulated movement of a reference image within a model of the spatial coil sensitivities. A FIDnav module was inserted into a nonselective 3D FLASH sequence, and rigid-body motion parameters were retrospectively estimated every readout time using nonlinear optimization to solve the inverse problem posed by the measured FIDnavs. This approach was tested in simulated data and in 7 volunteers, scanned at 3T with a 32-channel head coil array, performing a series of directed motion paradigms. FIDnav motion estimates achieved mean absolute errors of 0.34 ± 0.49 mm and 0.52 ± 0.61° across all subjects and scans, relative to ground-truth motion measurements provided by an electromagnetic tracking system. Retrospective correction with FIDnav motion estimates resulted in substantial improvements in quantitative image quality metrics across all scans with intentional head motion. Quantitative rigid-body motion information can be effectively estimated using the proposed FIDnav-based approach, which represents a practical method for retrospective motion compensation in less cooperative patient populations

    External hardware and sensors, for improved MRI

    No full text
    Complex engineered systems are often equipped with suites of sensors and ancillary devices that monitor their performance and maintenance needs. MRI scanners are no different in this regard. Some of the ancillary devices available to support MRI equipment, the ones of particular interest here, have the distinction of actually participating in the image acquisition process itself. Most commonly, such devices are used to monitor physiological motion or variations in the scanner's imaging fields, allowing the imaging and/or reconstruction process to adapt as imaging conditions change. “Classic” examples include electrocardiography (ECG) leads and respiratory bellows to monitor cardiac and respiratory motion, which have been standard equipment in scan rooms since the early days of MRI. Since then, many additional sensors and devices have been proposed to support MRI acquisitions. The main physical properties that they measure may be primarily “mechanical” (eg acceleration, speed, and torque), “acoustic” (sound and ultrasound), “optical” (light and infrared), or “electromagnetic” in nature. A review of these ancillary devices, as currently available in clinical and research settings, is presented here. In our opinion, these devices are not in competition with each other: as long as they provide useful and unique information, do not interfere with each other and are not prohibitively cumbersome to use, they might find their proper place in future suites of sensors. In time, MRI acquisitions will likely include a plurality of complementary signals. A little like the microbiome that provides genetic diversity to organisms, these devices can provide signal diversity to MRI acquisitions and enrich measurements. Machine-learning (ML) algorithms are well suited at combining diverse input signals toward coherent outputs, and they could make use of all such information toward improved MRI capabilities
    corecore