BeEAM conditioning with bendamustine-replacing BCNU before autologous transplantation is safe and effective in lymphoma patients.

BEAM with BCNU is commonly used for conditioning treatment followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, pulmonary toxicity and availability issues associated with BCNU prompted us to evaluate bendamustine-replacing BCNU (BeEAM). We analyzed 39 lymphoma patients receiving BeEAM conditioning with 200 mg/m(2) bendamustine at days -7 and -6. The median duration until neutrophil recovery was 11 days, and 15 days for platelet recovery (>20 g/L). The most common grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities comprised mucosal side effects (27 pts.). Pulmonary toxicity was observed in one patient (2.5%), and one patient died of septic complications. The CR rate increased from 33% to 74% 100 days after ASCT. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months, progression and death each occurred in 11 patients (28%). Median progression-free and overall survival at 2 years were 69% and 72%. Our data suggest that BeEAM conditioning using bendamustine is safe and results in promising survival rates

Consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation in first remission is safe and effective in AML patients above 65 years.

The outcome of AML patients ≥65 years remains disappointing. Current post-induction strategies for elderly AML patients fit for intensive treatment involve additional cycles of chemotherapy or allogeneic transplantation. Consolidation with autologous transplantation (ASCT) is poorly studied in these patients. In this single-center retrospective analysis, we determined survival rates of AML patients ≥65 years undergoing busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning before ASCT in first remission between 2007 and 2015. We found elderly AML patients with ASCT to have longer progression-free survival (PFS; 16.3 vs. 5.1 months, P=0.0166) and overall survival (OS; n.r. vs. 8.2 months; P=0.0255) than elderly AML patients without ASCT consolidation. In addition, elderly AML patients undergoing ASCT had comparable PFS (P=0.9462) and OS (P=0.7867) as AML patients below 65 years receiving ASCT consolidation in CR1. Our data suggest that ASCT is an option in elderly fit AML patients who appear to benefit from autologous consolidation similarly to younger AML patients

Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly patients with multiple myeloma: evaluation of its safety and efficacy.

Administering high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with melphalan to elderly myeloma patients represents a challenge with respect to achieving therapeutic efficacy whilst avoiding significant toxicity. We analyzed safety and efficacy of HDCT in 61 elderly myeloma patients older than 65 years, including 12 patients ≥70 years, and compared them with 237 MM patients below 65 years treated in the same period. We observed no differences in the time until neutrophil recovery, infection rate, and treatment related mortality until 100 days after ASCT. Furthermore, higher age was not associated with inferior progression-free and overall survival at 1 and 2 years after ASCT. However, MM patients older than 70 years had a longer duration of hospitalization (26 vs. 20 days; p= .0001) and a longer time until platelet recovery >20G/L (20 vs. 13 days; p= .0007). Our data suggest that HDCT with ASCT is feasible, safe and effective in MM patients older than 65 years

Oxaliplatin-induced immune pancytopenia

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum compound, has been implicated in isolated cases of immune hemolytic anemia and/or immune thrombocytopenia. The first case of severe immune pancytopenia related to oxaliplatin is described. PATIENT AND METHODS: A 79-year-old woman with colorectal cancer was initially treated with 5-fluorouracil and she later received oxaliplatin and leucovorin every 2 to 4 weeks. During the 15th and 17th cycles of chemotherapy she developed thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, and neutropenia. No problems occurred during the 16th cycle without oxaliplatin. Serologic testing including detection of drug-dependent antibodies and autoantibodies was performed with standard techniques. RESULTS: Serologic findings included a positive immunoglobulin G direct antiglobulin test; nonreactive red blood cell (RBC) eluates; platelet (PLT)-bound antibodies to glycophorin (GP) IIb-IIIa, GPIb-IX, and GPIa-IIa; and oxaliplatin-dependent antibodies to PLTs, RBCs, and neutrophils. CONCLUSION: Oxaliplatin may lead to the production of ddabs to RBCs, PLTs, and neutrophils. Thus the risk of immune cytopenias should always be considered in patients treated with oxaliplatin

Delayed Haematological recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation is associated with favourable outcome in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is applied to consolidate first remission in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). However, outcome after ASCT widely varies among AML patients. We analyzed the prognostic significance of haematological recovery for neutrophils [absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >1·0 × 10(9) /l] and platelets (platelet count >20·0 × 10(9) /l), stratifying at day 20 after ASCT in 88 consecutive and homogeneously treated AML patients in first remission. We observed that patients with delayed recovery had better overall survival (OS; ANC: P < 0·0001 and platelets: P = 0·0062) and time to progression (TTP; ANC: P = 0·0003 and platelets: P = 0·0125). Delayed recovery was an independent marker for better OS and TTP in a multivariate analysis including age, gender, number of transfused CD34+ cells, cytogenetics, FLT3-internal tandem duplication and NPM1 mutation. Our results suggest that delayed neutrophil and platelet recovery is associated with longer OS and TTP in AML patients consolidated with ASCT in first remission

Role of plerixafor in autologous stem cell mobilization with vinorelbine chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with myeloma: a phase II study (PAV-trial)

Current practice in Switzerland for the mobilization of autologous stem cells in patients with myeloma is combining vinorelbine chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) cytokine stimulation. We prospectively investigated adding intravenous plerixafor to the vinorelbine/G-CSF combination (VGP), and compared it with vinorelbine/plerixafor (VP) and G-CSF/plerixafor (GP) combinations. In a final cohort (VP-late), plerixafor was given on the first day of CD34 + cells increasing to > 15 000/mL peripheral blood. Four consecutive cohorts of 10 patients with myeloma were studied. We observed that intravenously administered plerixafor can be safely combined with vinorelbine/G-CSF. VGP was superior in mobilizing peripheral stem and progenitor cells compared to the three double combinations (VP, GP and VP-late), and GP mobilized better than VP. Our data indicate that the triple combination of VGP is an efficient strategy to collect autologous CD34 + cells, with G-CSF contributing predominantly in this concept. Plerixafor can be safely added to G-CSF and/or vinorelbine chemotherapy

Revisiting G-CSF Support for Hematologic Recovery after Autologous Transplantation in AML Patients

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to support hematologic recovery in induction and consolidation treatment reduces the number of febrile episodes and the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization. However, the benefit and safety of administering G-CSF to enhance hematologic recovery in AML patients after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) have not been reported so far. At our center, it was our policy to administer G-CSF after ASCT in all AML patients. In June 2015, increasing economic pressure prompted us to omit G-CSF after ASCT. In this retrospective study, we assessed the effects of changing our strategy from applying G-CSF for hematologic recovery after ASCT (in 103 AML patients) to omitting G-CSF (12 patients). We found that administering G-CSF shortened the median duration until neutrophil recovery was >0.5 G/l after ASCT by four days (P=.0001), and patients with G-CSF tended to have fewer bacteremias (38.3% versus 66.6%; P=.0654). The median duration of hospitalization was two days longer in patients without G-CSF support (25 versus 23 days; P=.0603). According to the Swiss in-patient reimbursement system, the shorter hospitalization of +G-CSF patients resulted in decreased total costs per patient of 3305 CHF (48 Mio U of G-CSF), and 3367 CHF (30 Mio U). Finally, no differences were observed in disease free (P=.0938) and overall survival (P=.7999) rates between +G-CSF versus –G-CSF patients. Our data suggest that G-CSF support after ASCT is safe and associated with shorter time until neutrophil recovery, fewer bacteremia episodes, shorter hospitalization, and lower costs. Keywords: Autologous; Transplant; AML; Leukemia; Recovery; Prognosis; Survival; Granulocyte-colony Stimulating factor; G-CSF; Consolidatio

NSAID treatment with meloxicam enhances peripheral stem cell mobilization in myeloma.

Chemotherapy with G-CSF is used to mobilize peripheral stem cells in multiple myeloma (MM) patients, with plerixafor as a rescue strategy for poorly mobilizing patients. Preclinical studies suggested that the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam enhances the mobilization of CD34+ cells. In this single-center study, we evaluated whether adding meloxicam to chemotherapy/G-CSF mobilization increases peripheral hematopoietic CD34+ cell levels and reduces the need of using plerixafor. We prospectively compared two consecutive cohorts of MM patients in first remission mobilized with G-CSF and non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine. The second cohort additionally received oral meloxicam. The cohorts comprised 84 patients without meloxicam (-M) and 66 patients with meloxicam (+M). Meloxicam was well tolerated and associated with similar hematologic engraftment after transplantation and equal survival rates. However, the meloxicam group had higher CD34+ cell levels on day 8 of the mobilization procedure (53 200 versus 35 600 CD34+ cells/mL; P=0.007), and fewer patients needed >1 collection day (+M: 6 (9%) patients versus -M: 16 (19%) patients; P=0.04). This resulted in reduced plerixafor administrations (+M: 7 (11%) patients versus -M: 18 (21%) patients; P=0.03) and less costs. Our data suggest that meloxicam enhances the mobilization of hematopoietic CD34+ blood cells in MM patients.Bone Marrow Transplantation advance online publication, 23 October 2017; doi:10.1038/bmt.2017.234