38 research outputs found
Specifics of cerebral haemodynamics in patients with the hemispheric ischemic stroke
ΠΠΏ inspection is conducted 112 patients with hemispheric ischemic stroke (IS) in age from 40 to 84 years, part on the degree of expressed of neurological deficit in obedience to the Scandinavian scale (35,7+8,1) - 1 group (54), (53,8+4,2 points) is II a group (58). The comparative analysis of neurological deficit is given, level neuron - specific enolase (NSE) in blood, hemodynamic indexes, character of atherosclerotic name-plates. We compared the hemodynamic features of carotid and vertebrobasilar region. Dependence is exposed between expressed of neurological defect, degree of damage of fabric of brain, characterized by the change of level of NSE and degree of disturbances of hemodynamic. The highest degree of severity of neurological symptoms of hemispheric IS was observed in significant concomitant carotid lesions and vertebrobasilar region extravasal compression of vertebral arteries dynamic nature, combined with little hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis predominated in patients with hemispheric IS with a lesser degree of ischemic damage and neurological deficits. Character of atherosclerotic name-plates reflected pathogenic of ischemic stroke.ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Π·Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΡΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 112 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ° (ΠΠ) Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡ 40 Π΄ΠΎ 84 Π»Π΅Ρ, ΡΠ°Π·Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Π²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ (35,7+8,1) - 1 Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° (54); (53,8+4,2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²) - II Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° (58). Π£ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏ Π΄Π°Π½ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°, ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΎΠ½ - ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΅Π½ΠΎΠ»Π°Π·Ρ (ΠΠ‘Π) Π² ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ, Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊ, ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠΎ-Π±Π°Π·ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ½Π°Ρ
. Π£ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°, ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΠ‘Π ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΊΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°Ρ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΡΠΆΠ΅ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΠ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°Π»Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π±ΡΠΎΠ±Π°Π·ΠΈΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠ², ΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ°Π²Π°Π·Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ½ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π² ΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π³Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ (65-70%) ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΠ·Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΡ
Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°Π΄Π°Π»Π° Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΠ Ρ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ°. Π₯Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅Ρ Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π±Π»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊ ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π» ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π· ΠΈΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°
Systematic Review of Potential Health Risks Posed by Pharmaceutical, Occupational and Consumer Exposures to Metallic and Nanoscale Aluminum, Aluminum Oxides, Aluminum Hydroxide and Its Soluble Salts
Aluminum (Al) is a ubiquitous substance encountered both naturally (as the third most abundant element) and intentionally (used in water, foods, pharmaceuticals, and vaccines); it is also present in ambient and occupational airborne particulates. Existing data underscore the importance of Al physical and chemical forms in relation to its uptake, accumulation, and systemic bioavailability. The present review represents a systematic examination of the peer-reviewed literature on the adverse health effects of Al materials published since a previous critical evaluation compiled by Krewski et al. (2007).
Challenges encountered in carrying out the present review reflected the experimental use of different physical and chemical Al forms, different routes of administration, and different target organs in relation to the magnitude, frequency, and duration of exposure. Wide variations in diet can result in Al intakes that are often higher than the World Health Organization provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI), which is based on studies with Al citrate. Comparing daily dietary Al exposures on the basis of βtotal Alβassumes that gastrointestinal bioavailability for all dietary Al forms is equivalent to that for Al citrate, an approach that requires validation. Current occupational exposure limits (OELs) for identical Al substances vary as much as 15-fold.
The toxicity of different Al forms depends in large measure on their physical behavior and relative solubility in water. The toxicity of soluble Al forms depends upon the delivered dose of Al+ 3 to target tissues. Trivalent Al reacts with water to produce bidentate superoxide coordination spheres [Al(O2)(H2O4)+ 2 and Al(H2O)6 + 3] that after complexation with O2β’β, generate Al superoxides [Al(O2β’)](H2O5)]+ 2. Semireduced AlO2β’ radicals deplete mitochondrial Fe and promote generation of H2O2, O2 β’ β and OHβ’. Thus, it is the Al+ 3-induced formation of oxygen radicals that accounts for the oxidative damage that leads to intrinsic apoptosis. In contrast, the toxicity of the insoluble Al oxides depends primarily on their behavior as particulates.
Aluminum has been held responsible for human morbidity and mortality, but there is no consistent and convincing evidence to associate the Al found in food and drinking water at the doses and chemical forms presently consumed by people living in North America and Western Europe with increased risk for Alzheimer\u27s disease (AD). Neither is there clear evidence to show use of Al-containing underarm antiperspirants or cosmetics increases the risk of AD or breast cancer. Metallic Al, its oxides, and common Al salts have not been shown to be either genotoxic or carcinogenic. Aluminum exposures during neonatal and pediatric parenteral nutrition (PN) can impair bone mineralization and delay neurological development. Adverse effects to vaccines with Al adjuvants have occurred; however, recent controlled trials found that the immunologic response to certain vaccines with Al adjuvants was no greater, and in some cases less than, that after identical vaccination without Al adjuvants.
The scientific literature on the adverse health effects of Al is extensive. Health risk assessments for Al must take into account individual co-factors (e.g., age, renal function, diet, gastric pH). Conclusions from the current review point to the need for refinement of the PTWI, reduction of Al contamination in PN solutions, justification for routine addition of Al to vaccines, and harmonization of OELs for Al substances