Ground State Spin Structure of Strongly Interacting Disordered 1D Hubbard Model

We study the influence of on-site disorder on the magnetic properties of the ground state of the infinite U 1D Hubbard model. We find that the ground state is not ferromagnetic. This is analyzed in terms of the algebraic structure of the spin dependence of the Hamiltonian. A simple explanation is derived for the 1/N periodicity in the persistent current for this model.Comment: 3 pages, no figure

Cluster-variation approximation for a network-forming lattice-fluid model

We consider a 3-dimensional lattice model of a network-forming fluid, which has been recently investigated by Girardi and coworkers by means of Monte Carlo simulations [J. Chem. Phys. \textbf{126}, 064503 (2007)], with the aim of describing water anomalies. We develop an approximate semi-analytical calculation, based on a cluster-variation technique, which turns out to reproduce almost quantitatively different thermodynamic properties and phase transitions determined by the Monte Carlo method. Nevertheless, our calculation points out the existence of two different phases characterized by long-range orientational order, and of critical transitions between them and to a high-temperature orientationally-disordered phase. Also, the existence of such critical lines allows us to explain certain ``kinks'' in the isotherms and isobars determined by the Monte Carlo analysis. The picture of the phase diagram becomes much more complex and richer, though unfortunately less suitable to describe real water.Comment: 10 pages, 9 figures, submitted to J. Chem. Phy

Revisiting waterlike network-forming lattice models

In a previous paper [J. Chem. Phys. 129, 024506 (2008)] we studied a 3 dimensional lattice model of a network-forming fluid, recently proposed in order to investigate water anomalies. Our semi-analytical calculation, based on a cluster-variation technique, turned out to reproduce almost quantitatively several Monte Carlo results and allowed us to clarify the structure of the phase diagram, including different kinds of orientationally ordered phases. Here, we extend the calculation to different parameter values and to other similar models, known in the literature. We observe that analogous ordered phases occur in all these models. Moreover, we show that certain "waterlike" thermodynamic anomalies, claimed by previous studies, are indeed artifacts of a homogeneity assumption made in the analytical treatment. We argue that such a difficulty is common to a whole class of lattice models for water, and suggest a possible way to overcome the problem.Comment: 13 pages, 12 figure

Glassy states in lattice models with many coexisting crystalline phases

We study the emergence of glassy states after a sudden cooling in lattice models with short range interactions and without any a priori quenched disorder. The glassy state emerges whenever the equilibrium model possesses a sufficient number of coexisting crystalline phases at low temperatures, provided the thermodynamic limit be taken before the infinite time limit. This result is obtained through simulations of the time relaxation of the standard Potts model and some exclusion models equipped with a local stochastic dynamics on a square lattice.Comment: 12 pages, 4 figure

Consequences of wall stiffness for a beta-soft potential

Modifications of the infinite square well E(5) and X(5) descriptions of transitional nuclear structure are considered. The eigenproblem for a potential with linear sloped walls is solved. The consequences of the introduction of sloped walls and of a quadratic transition operator are investigated.Comment: RevTeX 4, 8 pages, as published in Phys. Rev.

A simple description of the states 0+0^+ and 2+2^+ in 168Er^{168}Er

A sixth-order quadrupole boson Hamiltonian is used to describe 26 states $0^+$ and 67 states $2^+$ which have been recently identified in $^{168}Er$. Two closed expressions are alternatively used for energy levels. One corresponds to a semi-classical approach while the other one represents the exact eigenvalue of the model Hamiltonian. The semi-classical expression involves four parameters, while the exact eigenvalue is determined by five parameters. In each of the two descriptions a least square fit procedure is adopted. Both expressions provide a surprisingly good agreement with the experimental data.Comment: 9 pages, 5 figure