3 research outputs found

    In situ strain detection of stress-strain relationships and their controls on progressive damage in marble and quartzite by neutron diffraction experiments

    Get PDF
    The application of data derived from rock mechanical experiments to large spatial and temporal scales required to assess rock slope stability and landscape evolution is complicated, as these processes of rocks are affected by its lithology, tectonic heritage and rheological behavior under the contemporary stress field. Interpretations of experiments and field sites are restricted to surficial, pre and post state observations of deformations, under almost always subcritical near surface stress fields. We set up an novel experiment to quantify a) the level of inherited residual elastic strains, b) the effect of subcritical low magnitude load steps, c) load magnitudes at which deformation become permanent and further strains are induced and d) differences of rheological behavior due to lithology. In order to gain greater insight into the stress-strain relationships and their control on progressive damage we employed in situ neutron diffraction techniques to observe crystal lattice strains in pure marble (Carrara marble, > 98 vol% CaCO3) and quartzite (Dalsland quartzite, > 98 vol% SiO2) samples during stepped Brazilian tests. We measure a gauge volume of ∼42mm3 in the center of cylindrical samples (Ø= 30 mm, l = 22 mm quartzite, l = 26 mm marble) using the EPSILON neutron time-of-flight (TOF) strain diffractometer in Dubna, Russia. Surface-mounted strain gauges provide macroscopic strain data, and acoustic emission sensors are used to detect microcrack initiation. Initial states are measured without load to determine the load-free lattice parameters. Load is increased in three to four stages of approximately 15%, 33%, 66%, and 75-80% of the ultimate intact rock strength (σ1 max), and maintained during diffraction measurements (up to 12 hours each). Each load step is followed by a load-free state. Deviatoric strain in both major principal compressive (σ1) and minor principal in plane (σ3) direction, as well as residual strain, with reference to a strain-free state of powdered samples are calculated for whole diffraction patterns. We obtained initial residual contractional strains of ∼-150 μstrain for Carrara marble and of ∼-50 μstrain for the Dalsland quartzite samples. Already during the first load step of ∼10-15% σ1 max superposition of the residual strain state is observed and strains partially remain during unloading step. Increased stress magnitudes of the load steps enable us to identify strains as a function of external load and subsequent unloading, indicating, in both rocks, that upon unloading from former loads to less than 75% σ1 max, the material remains partially extensionally strained

    Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path

    No full text
    Pore pressure/stress coupling is the change in the smaller horizontal stress σh associated with changes in pore pressure P, and has been measured in numerous reservoirs worldwide. These measurements suggest that the change in minimum horizontal stress Δσh is on average ca. 64% of the change in the reservoir pore pressure ΔP, but can be as low as 34% and as high as 118%. Conventionally it is assumed that the total vertical stress σv, given by the overburden, is not affected by changes in pore pressure, in contrast to the horizontal stresses σH and σh. We investigate analytically and numerically the spatio-temporal pore pressure and stress evolution in poroelastic media for continuous fluid injection at a point source, and calculate from the numerical modelling results the ratio Δσ/ΔP. Analytically, we show that the measured average of Δσh/ΔP can mathematically be deduced from the long-term limit of the spatio-temporal evolution of pore pressure and horizontal stress caused by fluid injection at a point source. We compare our numerical results to the analytical solution for continuous point injection into homogeneous poroelastic media as well as to Δσh/ΔP values measured in the field, and show that all stress components change with a variation in P. We use the concept of poroelasticity to explain the observed coupling between pore pressure and stress in reservoirs, and we consider different measurement locations and measurement times as one possible reason for the measured variation in Δσh/ΔP in different oil fields worldwide. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.Johannes B. Altmann, Tobias M. Muller, Birgit I.R. Muller, Mark R.P.Tingay and Oliver Heidbachhttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/256/description#descriptio
    corecore