25 research outputs found

    Beta diversity indices of prokaryotes and eukaryotes by ulcer size.

    Full text link
    Beta diversity of prokaryotes (A) and eukaryotes (B) based on the sample type (healthy skin (Healthy) or the lesion (Lesion)) divided by ulcer size (categorized into quartiles: Q1 = 150mm, Q2 = 151-245mm, Q3 = 246-501mm, Q4 = 502-1963mm). There are not significant differences between ulcer size groups. (TIF)</p

    Geographical sampling locations.

    Full text link
    Map illustrating the geographical locations from which samples were collected in Colombia. Includes an explanation of the sample codification system, which is based on the initials of the collection sites (B = Bonza, G = Guaviare, M = MedellĂ­n), the sample type (L = Skin Lesion, S = Healthy Skin) and a unique numerical identifier (e.g., BL-13). The map was constructed using QGIS version 2.18.7. Basemap: Elevation/World_Hillshade https://bit.ly/3vVQ1lL; Sources: Esri, Airbus DS, USGS, NGA, NASA, CGIAR, N Robinson, NCEAS, NLS, OS, NMA, Geodatastyrelsen, Rijkswaterstaat, GSA, Geoland, FEMA. (TIF)</p

    Relative abundance of sub-grouped prokaryotic and eukaryotic families and species.

    Full text link
    (A). Boxplots presenting alterations in the relative abundance of prokaryotic phyla within samples grouped into healthy skin (Healthy) and lesion skin (Lesion). Subsequently, the relative abundance of prokaryotic families is displayed, both without (B) and with the subgroup (C) of the most abundant species found on the skin according to the literature. Lastly, shifts in microbiota composition are portrayed for species from the selected subgroup of eukaryotes (D). (*) signify statistically significant differences between groups.</p

    Alpha diversity indices of prokaryotes and eukaryotes by <i>Leishmania</i> species.

    Full text link
    Alpha diversity indices of prokaryotes (A) and eukaryotes (B) based on the sample type (healthy skin (Healthy) or the lesion (Lesion)) divided by Leishmania species (L.b = L. braziliensis, L.b/Ln. = L. braziliensis/L. naiffi, L.b/Ln./L.p-g = L. braziliensis/L. naiffi/L.panamensis-guyanenensis complex, L.p-g = L.panamensis-guyanenensis). There are not significant differences between species groups. (TIF)</p

    Relative abundance of prokaryotic species.

    Full text link
    Boxplots illustrating changes in the relative abundance of prokaryotic species within samples categorized by healthy skin (Healthy) and lesion skin (Lesion). There are not significant differences between prokaryotic species groups. (TIF)</p

    Beta diversity indices of prokaryotes and eukaryotes by <i>Leishmania</i> species.

    Full text link
    Beta diversity of prokaryotes (A) and eukaryotes (B) based on the sample type (healthy skin (Healthy) or the lesion (Lesion)) divided by Leishmania species. There are not significant differences between species groups. (TIF)</p

    Relative abundance of prokaryotic and eukaryotic phyla, families, and species.

    Full text link
    Boxplots illustrating changes in the relative abundance of prokaryotic phyla within samples categorized by healthy skin (Healthy) and lesion skin (Lesion), both without (A) and with the subgroup (B) of the most abundant species found on the skin according to the literature. This is followed by an analysis of changes in the composition of prokaryotic (C) and eukaryotic (D) families. Finally, alterations in relative abundance are demonstrated for species using the subgroup approach for both prokaryotes (E) and eukaryotes (F). (*) denote statistically significant differences between groups.</p

    Alpha diversity indices of prokaryotes and eukaryotes by injury body location.

    Full text link
    Alpha diversity indices of prokaryotes (A) and eukaryotes (B) based on the sample type (healthy skin (Healthy) or the lesion (Lesion)) divided by injury body location. There are not significant differences between injury body location groups. (TIF)</p

    Relative abundance of <i>Leishmania</i> species.

    Full text link
    The abundance is expressed in percentage (%) related with the analyzed samples found in CL patients from three geographical locations in Colombia (Bonza, Guaviare, MedellĂ­n), focusing on those with an abundance greater than 5%.</p

    Correlation analysis between prokaryotic genus and parasitic load.

    Full text link
    Correlation analysis showing the abundance values of the genus Acinetobacter, the only significant genus in this analysis. Spearman’s correlation test was applied, and the resulting coefficient (R) and p-value are clearly indicated.</p
    corecore