Rapid highly sensitive general protein quantification through on-chip chemiluminescence.

Protein detection and quantification is a routinely performed procedure in research laboratories, predominantly executed either by spectroscopy-based measurements, such as NanoDrop, or by colorimetric assays. The detection limits of such assays, however, are limited to μ M concentrations. To establish an approach that achieves general protein detection at an enhanced sensitivity and without necessitating the requirement for signal amplification steps or a multicomponent detection system, here, we established a chemiluminescence-based protein detection assay. Our assay specifically targeted primary amines in proteins, which permitted characterization of any protein sample and, moreover, its latent nature eliminated the requirement for washing steps providing a simple route to implementation. Additionally, the use of a chemiluminescence-based readout ensured that the assay could be operated in an excitation source-free manner, which did not only permit an enhanced sensitivity due to a reduced background signal but also allowed for the use of a very simple optical setup comprising only an objective and a detection element. Using this assay, we demonstrated quantitative protein detection over a concentration range of five orders of magnitude and down to a high sensitivity of 10 pg mL - 1 , corresponding to pM concentrations. The capability of the platform presented here to achieve a high detection sensitivity without the requirement for a multistep operation or a multicomponent optical system sets the basis for a simple yet universal and sensitive protein detection strategy.Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Schmidt Science Fellows program in partnership with the Rhodes Trust European Research Council Newman Foundatio

Real-Time Highly-Sensitive Protein Quantification Through On-Chip Chemiluminescence

A range of experimental methods have been developed to achieve highly sensitive detection and quantification of proteins. The majority of these methods rely on fluorescence-mediated readouts and, as such, their sensitivity can be affected by factors such as photobleaching of fluorophores and background signal from the illumination source. Both of these limitations can be overcome by using chemiluminescence-based detection: in contrast to fluorescence, chemiluminescence can be generated in an excitation source free manner, which allows for a significant reduction in background noise and for the use of an optical setup that comprises only a detection element. Here, we develop a highly-sensitive protein quantification platform by combining chemiluminescent detection of proteins with microfluidic mixing and detection. We use the platform to demonstrate quantitative detection of proteins over a concentration range of five orders of magnitude and down to 10 pg mL−1, corresponding to pM concentrations. Owing to the general presence of amine groups in peptides and proteins, our demonstrated system is applicable to characterising any protein sample and it can be used to quantify unlabelled samples. </div

Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Advances in computer processing and improvements in data availability have led to the development of machine learning (ML) techniques for mammographic imaging. Purpose To evaluate the reported performance of stand-alone ML applications for screening mammography workflow. Materials and Methods Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, and Web of Science literature databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2012 to September 2020. The study was registered with the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (protocol no. CRD42019156016). Stand-alone technology was defined as a ML algorithm that can be used independently of a human reader. Studies were quality assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool, and reporting was evaluated using the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging. A primary meta-analysis included the top-performing algorithm and corresponding reader performance from which pooled summary estimates for the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated using a bivariate model. Results Fourteen articles were included, which detailed 15 studies for stand-alone detection (n = 8) and triage (n = 7). Triage studies reported that 17%-91% of normal mammograms identified could be read by adapted screening, while "missing" an estimated 0%-7% of cancers. In total, an estimated 185 252 cases from three countries with more than 39 readers were included in the primary meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC was 75.4% (95% CI: 65.6, 83.2; P = .11), 90.6% (95% CI: 82.9, 95.0; P = .40), and 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.98), respectively, for algorithms, and 73.0% (95% CI: 60.7, 82.6), 88.6% (95% CI: 72.4, 95.8), and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.97), respectively, for readers. Conclusion Machine learning (ML) algorithms that demonstrate a stand-alone application in mammographic screening workflows achieve or even exceed human reader detection performance and improve efficiency. However, this evidence is from a small number of retrospective studies. Therefore, further rigorous independent external prospective testing of ML algorithms to assess performance at preassigned thresholds is required to support these claims. ©RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Whitman and Moseley in this issue.This work was supported by the CRUK grant [C543/A26884] and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre