The impact of race and socioeconomic status on outcomes for HPV-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

e18103 Background: The socioeconomic factors affecting outcomes of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) are poorly characterized. Methods: A custom Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database identified adult patients with primary non-metastatic SCCHN and known HPV status diagnosed between 2013-14. Multivariable logistic regression defined associations between patient characteristics and HPV status, with adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported. Fine-Gray competing risks regression estimated adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) and 95% CIs for cancer-specific mortality (CSM), including a disease subsite*HPV status*race interaction term. Results: 4735 patients with non-metastatic SCCHN and known HPV status were identified. HPV-associated SCCHN was positively associated with oropharyngeal primary, male sex and higher education and negatively associated with uninsured status, single marital status, and non-white race (p≤0.001 for all). For HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCHN, white race was associated with lower CSM (AHR 0.55, 95%CI 0.34-0.88, p = 0.01) and uninsured status was associated with higher CSM (AHR 3.12, 95%CI 1.19-8.13, p = 0.02). These associations were not observed in HPV-negative or non-oropharynx SCCHN. Accordingly, there was a statistically significant disease subsite*HPV status*race interaction (pint< 0.001). Conclusions: Non-white race and uninsured status were associated with worse CSM in HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCHN, while no such associations were observed in HPV-negative or non-oropharyngeal SCCHN. These results suggest that, despite having clinically favorable disease, non-white patients with HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCCHN have worse outcomes than their white peers. Further work is needed to understand and reduce socioeconomic disparities in SCCHN

Students' participation in collaborative research should be recognised

Letter to the editor