Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints

OBJECTIVES: To generate insight into the differences between utility measures EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI2) and Mark III (HUI3) and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for hearing aid fitting METHODS: Persons with hearing complaints completed EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 at baseline and, when applicable, after hearing aid fitting. Practicality, construct validity, agreement, responsiveness and impact on the ICER were examined. RESULTS: All measures had high completion rates. HUI3 was capable of discriminating between clinically distinctive groups. Utility scores (n = 315) for EQ-5D UK and Dutch tariff (0.83; 0.86), HUI2 (0.77) and HUI3 (0.61) were significantly different, agreement was low to moderate. Change after hearing aid fitting (n = 70) for HUI2 (0.07) and HUI3 (0.12) was statistically significant, unlike the EQ-5D UK (0.01) and Dutch (0.00) tariff. ICERs varied from 647,209 euros/QALY for the EQ-5D Dutch tariff to 15,811 euros/QALY for HUI3. CONCLUSION: Utility scores, utility gain and ICERs heavily depend on the measure that is used to elicit them. This study indicates HUI3 as the instrument of first choice when measuring utility in a population with hearing complaints, but emphasizes the importance of a clear notion of what constitutes utility with regard to economic analyse

Compensating for Deviant Middle Ear Pressure in Otoacoustic Emission Measurements, Data, and Comparison to a Middle Ear Model

OBJECTIVE: Deviant middle ear pressure has a negative effect on the forward and backward transmission of stimulus and emissions through the middle ear. Resolving this deviant middle ear pressure is expected to lead to better middle ear transmission and, as a result of this, stronger otoacoustic emissions, which are better detectable. We investigated the effect of compensation o a deviant tympanic peak pressure on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs). Second, we compared patient data to model predictions made by Zwislocki's middle ear model. SETTING: University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine children aged between 0.5 and 9 years (mean, 4.4 yr). INTERVENTION: Hearing investigations including CEOAE measurements at ambient and at compensated tympanic peak pressure (TPP). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CEOAEs at ambient and compensated TPP. RESULTS: Compensation of TPP resulted in higher emission amplitudes below 2 kHz (increase of 8-11 dB). In addition, the compensated measurement showed an increased phase lag (up to one-fourth cycle). For ears with mild deviations of TPP, Zwislocki's model could describe these changes. Pressure compensation was well described by a compliance increase of the tympanic membrane, the malleus, and the incus. CONCLUSION: Compensating the ear canal pressure for negative tympanic peak pressure increased CEOAE amplitudes below 2 kHz and increased the phase lag. These changes can be predicted from an increase of the compliance of the tympanic membrane, incus, and malleus, as a consequence of the pressure compensation

Qualitative interviews on the beliefs and feelings of adults towards their ownership, but non-use of hearing aids

Objective: Up to a quarter of the adults who own hearing aids never use them. To provide these 'non-users' with the best help, hearing care professionals need to have an in-depth understanding of the non-users' beliefs and feelings with regard to the non-use. This qualitative study explored these beliefs and feelings in order to increase our understanding of hearing aid non-users. Design: Individual face-to-face semi-structured interviews were completed. Study sample: Eleven hearing aid owners (aged 54-80 years) who reported that they never or hardly ever used their hearing aids. Results: The participants expressed a variety of feelings towards their non-use, including indifference, self-annoyance, frustration, powerlessness, shame, and guilt. Their feelings were related to beliefs about: (1) the severity of their hearing handicap with and without hearing aids, (2) whom or what was responsible for the non-use, and (3) the attitudes of significant others towards the non-use. Conclusions: Hearing-aid non-users differ in their beliefs and feelings towards the non-use. A patient-centred approach is needed

Choosing between measures: comparison of EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 in persons with hearing complaints

OBJECTIVES: To generate insight into the differences between utility measures EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D), Health Utilities Index Mark II (HUI2) and Mark III (HUI3) and their impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for hearing aid fitting METHODS: Persons with hearing complaints completed EQ-5D, HUI2 and HUI3 at baseline and, when applicable, after hearing aid fitting. Practicality, construct validity, agreement, responsiveness and impact on the ICER were examined. RESULTS: All measures had high completion rates. HUI3 was capable of discriminating between clinically distinctive groups. Utility scores (n = 315) for EQ-5D UK and Dutch tariff (0.83; 0.86), HUI2 (0.77) and HUI3 (0.61) were significantly different, agreement was low to moderate. Change after hearing aid fitting (n = 70) for HUI2 (0.07) and HUI3 (0.12) was statistically significant, unlike the EQ-5D UK (0.01) and Dutch (0.00) tariff. ICERs varied from 647,209 euros/QALY for the EQ-5D Dutch tariff to 15,811 euros/QALY for HUI3. CONCLUSION: Utility scores, utility gain and ICERs heavily depend on the measure that is used to elicit them. This study indicates HUI3 as the instrument of first choice when measuring utility in a population with hearing complaints, but emphasizes the importance of a clear notion of what constitutes utility with regard to economic analyse

Frequency shifts with age in click-evoked otoacoustic emissions of preterm infants

A previous study [Brienesse et al. (1997). Pediatr. Res. 42, 478-483] demonstrated a positive shift with increasing postmenstrual age (PMA) in the frequencies of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SSOAEs) in preterm infants. We used a mixed model approach to describe a shift with PMA in the spectra of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) measured in a group of 22 preterm infants. The rate in shift in CEOAE spectral components was found to be frequency dependent, with a mean estimate of 10 Hz/week for frequencies around 2 kHz and 30 Hz/week for frequencies around 4.25 kHz. This rate decreased with increasing PMA. Because SSOAEs are often part of the CEOAE response, a comparison was made between the shifts in SSOAEs and CEOAEs in a sub-group of 16 preterm infants. The results indicate that the shifts found for both types of OAE are similar, which supports a common mechanism for this change in OAE-characteristic. At present it is not clear to what extent developmental processes in the cochlea and the middle ear can account for these frequency shifts in the spectra of CEOAEs and SSOAEs during the preterm period. (C) 2011 Acoustical Society of America. [DOI: 10.1121/1.3583542