Quality of Life in Glaucoma: A Review of the Literature

<p><b>Article full text</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>The full text of this article can be found here<b>. </b><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-016-0333-6?view=classic">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-016-0333-6?view=classic</a></p> <p><br></p> <p><b>Provide enhanced content for this article</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/”mailto:[email protected]”"><b>[email protected]</b></a>.</p> <p><br></p> <p>The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:</p> <p><br></p> <p>• Slide decks</p> <p>• Videos and animations</p> <p>• Audio abstracts</p> <p>• Audio slides</p

The Importance of Knowledge Assets on University-Industry Collaboration: A Preliminary Analysis

Abstract. Intellectual capital is an important base for inter-organizational collaborative activities, including the industry-academic collaboration studied here. A preliminary study was conducted with analytic hierarchy process method, trying to know the dimensionalized associations between intellectual capital (i.e., Human, Structural, Customers, Organizational, Process, knowledge, and innovation capitals) and industry-academic collaboration (i.e., academic engagement and commercialization). Analyzing expert opinions, we gained matrices and priority scores, indicating that different forms of intellectual capital have different influences on academic engagement versus commercialization. The results remind scholarly works to look into detailed and differentiated mechanisms that utilize intellectual capital for governing industry-academic collaboration.Keywords. Intellectual capital, Industry-academic collaboration, Analytic hierarchy process; Taiwan.JEL. M10; L33; L52

Comparison of BDNF serum levels between early glaucoma patients, moderate glaucoma patients, advanced glaucoma patients and healthy controls.

<p>BDNF = brain derived neurotrophic factor. * = p<0.05 for the post-hoc comparisons of each glaucoma severity subgroup and healthy controls.</p

number of patients under ocular hypotensive treatments and systemic treatments in the whole study population.

<p>number of patients under ocular hypotensive treatments and systemic treatments in the whole study population.</p

Comparison of NGF serum levels between early glaucoma patients, moderate glaucoma patients, advanced glaucoma patients and healthy controls.

<p>NGF = nerve growth factor. * = p<0.05 for the post-hoc comparisons of each glaucoma severity subgroup and healthy controls.</p

Demographic characteristics of study population and results of ANOVA analysis to compare each glaucoma severity subgroups and healthy controls.

<p>Demographic characteristics of study population and results of ANOVA analysis to compare each glaucoma severity subgroups and healthy controls.</p

A Review of the Clinical Usefulness of Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty in Exfoliative Glaucoma

<p></p><p><b>Article full text</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>The full text of this article can be found here<b>. </b><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-018-0695-z">https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-018-0695-z</a></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p><br></p> <p><b>Provide enhanced content for this article</b></p> <p><br></p> <p>If you are an author of this publication and would like to provide additional enhanced content for your article then please contact <a href="http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/”mailto:[email protected]”"><b>[email protected]</b></a>.</p> <p><br></p> <p>The journal offers a range of additional features designed to increase visibility and readership. All features will be thoroughly peer reviewed to ensure the content is of the highest scientific standard and all features are marked as ‘peer reviewed’ to ensure readers are aware that the content has been reviewed to the same level as the articles they are being presented alongside. Moreover, all sponsorship and disclosure information is included to provide complete transparency and adherence to good publication practices. This ensures that however the content is reached the reader has a full understanding of its origin. No fees are charged for hosting additional open access content.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Other enhanced features include, but are not limited to:</p> <p><br></p> <p>• Slide decks</p> <p>• Videos and animations</p> <p>• Audio abstracts</p> <p>• Audio slides</p><br><p></p

Visual field results with the HFA 24–2 and HFA 10–2 test and the Octopus G1 program.

<p>Visual field results with the HFA 24–2 and HFA 10–2 test and the Octopus G1 program.</p

Central 10 degrees of the visual field with the locations of HFA 24–2, HFA 10–2 and Octopus G1 plotted in the same grid.

<p>The inner circle delimits the central 10 degrees area with test locations of the three tests (HFA 24–2, HFA 10–2 and Octopus G1) marked with different symbols. Cross = HFA 24–2; square = HFA 10–2; triangle = Octopus G1.</p

Pattern deviation plots of the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) 24–2 test and the HFA 10–2 test, and the corrected probability plot of the Octopus G1 program of the same early glaucoma eye from the study.

<p>The pattern deviation plot of the HFA 24–2 test shows no depressed test point within the central 10° area (the area surrounded by the cross shape line) but the sensitivity is reduced in the more peripheral area of the visual field. The pattern deviation plot of the HFA 10–2 test shows a cluster of depressed test point locations. The peripheral retinal sensitivity is not tested. The corrected probability plot of the Octopus G1 program shows a cluster of reduced sensitivity both in the central 10° area (the region within the inner black circle) and in the periphery.</p