Experimental Approach.

<p>A: Illustration of the sample preparation and MS work flow. B: Reproducibility/Internal Control. Relative levels of the ADH1 protein spiked into each heart lysate as determined by chromatographic peak intensity. C: Venn Diagram demonstrating the protein and phosphoprotein yield and overlap.</p

Phosphoproteomic Profiling of Human Myocardial Tissues Distinguishes Ischemic from Non-Ischemic End Stage Heart Failure

<div><p>The molecular differences between ischemic (IF) and non-ischemic (NIF) heart failure are poorly defined. A better understanding of the molecular differences between these two heart failure etiologies may lead to the development of more effective heart failure therapeutics. In this study extensive proteomic and phosphoproteomic profiles of myocardial tissue from patients diagnosed with IF or NIF were assembled and compared.</p><p>Proteins extracted from left ventricular sections were proteolyzed and phosphopeptides were enriched using titanium dioxide resin. Gel- and label-free nanoscale capillary liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution accuracy mass tandem mass spectrometry allowed for the quantification of 4,436 peptides (corresponding to 450 proteins) and 823 phosphopeptides (corresponding to 400 proteins) from the unenriched and phospho-enriched fractions, respectively.</p><p>Protein abundance did not distinguish NIF from IF. In contrast, 37 peptides (corresponding to 26 proteins) exhibited a ≥2-fold alteration in phosphorylation state (p<0.05) when comparing IF and NIF. The degree of protein phosphorylation at these 37 sites was specifically dependent upon the heart failure etiology examined. Proteins exhibiting phosphorylation alterations were grouped into functional categories: transcriptional activation/RNA processing; cytoskeleton structure/function; molecular chaperones; cell adhesion/signaling; apoptosis; and energetic/metabolism.</p><p>Phosphoproteomic analysis demonstrated profound post-translational differences in proteins that are involved in multiple cellular processes between different heart failure phenotypes. Understanding the roles these phosphorylation alterations play in the development of NIF and IF has the potential to generate etiology-specific heart failure therapeutics, which could be more effective than current therapeutics in addressing the growing concern of heart failure.</p></div

Demographic and clinical information.

<p>Demographic and clinical information.</p

Quantitation of SMAD3, AKT, MMP14, and AHR as determined by densitometry analysis and expressed as relative intensity (arbitrary units (AU)) normalized to actin levels.

<p>*: significantly elevated relative to non-failing, †: significantly elevated relative to both NIF and IF.</p

Proteins with statistically significant differential expression between NIF and NF heart tissue.

<p>Data was filtered to eliminate blood proteins and antibodies and to show only proteins with Protein Prophet probability >0.8, FDR-corrected p-value <0.05 and absolute fold-change >2. Proteins in bold were validated by western blot analysis.</p

Casein kinase phosphorylation targets.

<p>Nine of the differentially phosphorylated proteins shown in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0104157#pone-0104157-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a> are possible targets of casein kinase.</p

Evaluation of lactate and pyruvate levels in NF, non-failing; IF, ischemic failing; NIF, non-ischemic failing human myocardial tissues.

<p>Data is reported as fluorescent intensity relative to NF tissue.</p

Interaction network of non-ischemic failing hearts.

<p>Relevant interactions of the differentially expressed proteins and their relationships with selected pathologies are depicted.</p

Phosphopeptides with statistically significant differences between IF and NIF human heart tissue.

<p>Phosphorylation sites are underlined.</p

Quantitation of carbonic anhydrase 1, ceruloplasmin, fibulin 1, fibulin 2, serum amyloid A, fetuin A, and total and cleavage products of alpha 2 macroglobulin as determined by densitometry analysis and expressed as relative intensity (arbitrary units (AU)) normalized to actin levels.

<p>*: significantly elevated relative to NF samples, †: significantly elevated relative to both NIF and IF.</p