Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: A Review of the Most Updated Literature and a Presentation of Three Cases

In a Surgical Thoracic Center, two females and a man were unexpectedly diagnosed with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) in a single year. HAL is a rare lung cancer with pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of liver tumor or other primitive sites of neoplasms. As of today, a comprehensive treatment is still not written. We reviewed the most updated literature on HAL, aiming to highlight the proposed treatments available, and comparing them in terms of survival. General hallmarks of HAL are confirmed: it typically affects middle-aged, heavy-smoker males with a median of 5 cm bulky right upper lobe mass. Overall survival remains poor (13 months), with a longer but non-significant survival in females. Treatments are still unsatisfactory today: surgery guarantees a small benefit compared to non-operated HALs, and only N0 patients demonstrated improved survival (p = 0.04) compared to N1, N2, and N3. Even though the histology is fearsome, these are probably the patients who will benefit from upfront surgery. Chemotherapy seemed to behave as surgery, and there is no statistical difference between chemotherapy only, surgery, or adjuvant treatments, even though adjuvant treatments tend to be more successful. New chemotherapies have been reported with notable results in recent years, such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In this complicated picture, new cases are needed to further build shared evidence in terms of diagnosis, treatments, and survival opportunities

Hepatoid Adenocarcinoma of the Lung: A Review of the Most Updated Literature and a Presentation of Three Cases

In a Surgical Thoracic Center, two females and a man were unexpectedly diagnosed with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the lung (HAL) in a single year. HAL is a rare lung cancer with pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma with no evidence of liver tumor or other primitive sites of neoplasms. As of today, a comprehensive treatment is still not written. We reviewed the most updated literature on HAL, aiming to highlight the proposed treatments available, and comparing them in terms of survival. General hallmarks of HAL are confirmed: it typically affects middle-aged, heavy-smoker males with a median of 5 cm bulky right upper lobe mass. Overall survival remains poor (13 months), with a longer but non-significant survival in females. Treatments are still unsatisfactory today: surgery guarantees a small benefit compared to non-operated HALs, and only N0 patients demonstrated improved survival (p = 0.04) compared to N1, N2, and N3. Even though the histology is fearsome, these are probably the patients who will benefit from upfront surgery. Chemotherapy seemed to behave as surgery, and there is no statistical difference between chemotherapy only, surgery, or adjuvant treatments, even though adjuvant treatments tend to be more successful. New chemotherapies have been reported with notable results in recent years, such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies. In this complicated picture, new cases are needed to further build shared evidence in terms of diagnosis, treatments, and survival opportunities

Vascular/epithelial changes as late sequelae after recovery from SARS-COV-2 infection: an in-vivo comparative study

Aims: While there is partial evidence of lung lesions in patients suffering from long COVID there are substantial concerns about lung remodelling sequelae after COVID-19 pneumonia. The aim of the present retrospective comparative study was to ascertain morphological features in lung samples from patients undergoing tumour resection several months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods and results: The severity of several lesions with a major focus on the vascular bed was analysed in 2 tumour-distant lung fragments of 41 cases: 21 SARS-CoV-2 (+) lung tumour (LT) patients and 20 SARS-CoV-2 (-) LT patients. A systematic evaluation of several lesions was carried out by combining their scores into a grade of I-III. Tissue SARS-CoV-2 genomic/subgenomic transcripts were also investigated. Morphological findings were compared with clinical, laboratory and radiological data. SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients with previous pneumonia showed more severe parenchymal and vascular lesions than those found in SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients without pneumonia and SARS-CoV-2 (-) LT patients, mainly when combined scores were used. SARS-CoV-2 viral transcripts were not detected in any sample. SARS-CoV-2 (+) LT patients with pneumonia showed a significantly higher radiological global injury score. No other associations were found between morphological lesions and clinical data. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study that, after a granular evaluation of tissue parameters, detected several changes in lungs from patients undergoing tumour resection after SARS-CoV-2 infection. These lesions, in particular vascular remodelling, could have an important impact overall on the future management of these frail patients

Microscopical Variables and Tumor Inflammatory Microenvironment Do Not Modify Survival or Recurrence in Stage I-IIA Lung Adenocarcinomas

Microscopical predictors and Tumor Immune Microenvironment (TIME) have been studied less in early-stage NSCLC due to the curative intent of resection and the satisfactory survival rate achievable. Despite this, the emerging literature enforces the role of the immune system and microscopical predictors as prognostic variables in NSCLC and in adenocarcinomas (ADCs) as well. Here, we investigated whether cancer-related microscopical variables and TIME influence survival and recurrence in I-IIA ADCs. We retrospectively collected I-IIA ADCs treated (lobectomy or segmentectomy) at the University Hospital (Padova) between 2016 and 2022. We assigned to pathological variables a cumulative pathological score (PS) resulting as the sum of them. TIME was investigated as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs p = 0.37, p = 0.25, p = 0.41 and p = 0.23). Even the recurrence was non-significant (p = 0.90, p = 0.62, p = 0.97, p = 0.74). According to our findings, resection remains the best upfront treatment in I-IIA ADCs. Microscopical cancer activity grows from IA1 to IIA tumors, but it does not affect outcomes. These outcomes are also unmodified by TIME. Probably, microscopical cancer development and immune reaction against cancer are overwhelmed by an adequate R0-N0 resection