38 research outputs found

    L'arthrodèse mini-invasive dans le traitement chirurgical des pathologies rachidiennes dégénératives

    No full text
    Background and purpose: As in many other surgical fields, new minimally invasive techniques have been developed over the past 20 years, with reducing the muscular trauma associated with the traditional surgical approach and reducing related morbidity as the main goals. Initially limited to the laparoscopic or video-assisted approaches of the anterior spine, these techniques have been extended to the posterior transmuscular access of the lumbar spine. This article reviews the value of these approaches in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disorders. Methods: We describe the main techniques used in minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery, including posterior pedicle screwing as well as anterior (ALIF), posterior (PLIF), transforaminal (TLIF), extreme lateral (XLIf), and presacral (AxiaLIF) interbody fusion. The results of recently published series are reported. Results: Percutaneous pedicle screwing is reported to be an effective technique of lumbar spine arthrodesis associated with a low rate of screw misplacement. Minimally invasive PLIF, TLIF, and ALIF have been associated with shorter mean operative time, less postoperative pain, reduction of the estimated blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, and quicker functional recovery. Despite these encouraging early clinical results, no prospective, randomized published scientific study has proved that minimally invasive techniques are better than standard techniques. Larger clinical series with a longer follow-up could fill this gap. © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Objective evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery during free-living activity

    No full text
    Background: Evaluation of cervical spine mobility after surgery is mainly based on the measurement of the range of motion during imposed movements. It can thus be questionable if this assessment represents the mobility experienced during daily life. The goal of this study was to propose a new evaluation tool based on the monitoring of cervical spine movement during daily activities. Methods: The detection of cervical movement and the determination of primary motion component (lateral bending, axial rotation or flexion-extension), using two inertial sensors, were first validated in laboratory settings. Fifteen patients who underwent a cervical arthrodesis and nine healthy control subjects were monitored during their daily activity for half a day. The frequency of cervical movement was quantified according to posture, i.e. static and walking periods. The amplitude and velocity of cervical movement were evaluated using the median and cumulative distribution function. Findings: The movement detection and classification showed an excellent performance (sensitivity and specificity > 94%). For the daily monitoring, the patients presented a movement frequency similar to controls, whereas the amplitude and velocity in patients were lower than in controls (P b 0.05). The differences between patients and controls were larger for the velocity parameters (effect sizes > 0.37 and >0.54 for static and walking periods respectively) than for the amplitude parameters. Interpretation: Body-worn inertial sensors enable the quantitative evaluation of global cervical movement. The movement amplitude and velocity during free-living conditions can be used as objective parameters to evaluate the cervical spine mobility after treatment. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore