4 research outputs found

    Laparoscopic-assisted treatment of pyometra associated with mammary fibroadenomatous hyperplasia in a cat

    No full text
    This paper describes a case of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in a female cat presenting pyometra and mammary fibroadenomatous hyperplasia. Using four portals, mesovarium were ligated by titanium ligature clips whereas the uterine vessels were occluded by video-assisted conventional ligatures. There were no postoperative complications. Video-assisted technique can be an alternative method for treatment of pyometra and cystic endometrial hyperplasia in female cats

    Ciência Rural, v.44, n.3, mar

    No full text
    ABSTRACT This paper describes a case of laparoscopic-assisted ovariohysterectomy in a femal

    Ovariosalpingohisterectomia vídeo-assistida ou convencional em cadelas com o uso de Ligasure atlas™ Laparoscopic-assisted or open ovariohysterectomy using Ligasure atlas™ in dogs

    No full text
    Procurou-se comparar duas técnicas de ovariosalpingohisterectomia (OSH): vídeo-assistida com dois portais e convencional em cadelas, ambas com o uso de equipamento Ligasure atlas®. Para tanto, foram utilizados 18 animais separados em dois grupos, sendo no primeiro grupo realizada a OSH por celiotomia e no segundo pelo acesso vídeo-assistido. Os procedimentos videocirúrgicos foram realizados por meio de dois trocartes dispostos nas regiões umbilical e pré-púbica, com os cães posicionados em decúbito dorsal. Em ambos os grupos, o único método de hemostasia empregado foi o Ligasure atlas®. Não houve diferença significativa acerca do tempo operatório, das complicações trans e pós-operatórias e das perdas sanguíneas. Conclui-se que a OSH vídeo-assistida com o uso de dois portais e Ligasure atlas® e a técnica convencional com o emprego do mesmo equipamento são rápidas, seguras e efetivas em cadelas.<br>In this study the authors compared two different procedures of ovariosalpingohysterectomy (OSH) in dogs. For that, 18 dogs were randomly assigned into 2 different groups: group I (GI) in which the OSH was performed by celiotomy and group II (GII) in which it was a video-assisted procedure using two portals positioned in the umbilical and pre pubic regions, under dorsal recumbence position. In both groups the method of hemostasis was the Ligasure atlas®. The authors did not observe significant differences between both methods for the surgical time or complications during and after the surgical procedure and blood loss. It was concluded that OSH using video-assisted surgery with two portals and the conventional technique, both using Ligasure atlas® are safe, fast and effective to be used in dogs
    corecore