Rendimiento de cultivares de arveja (Pisum sativum, L) en diferentes ambientes de la República Argentina. Campaña 2021/2022

El mercado internacional de arveja transitó uno de los años de mayor volatilidad, comenzando por los efectos de la sequía en Canadá que recortó la oferta en más de un 50 % (AAFC, 2022), a la invasión de Ucrania por parte de Rusia. La oferta de arveja por parte de ambos países fue marcada en los últimos años, pero en el contexto actual es incierta la posibilidad de su participación en el mercado mundial. En ese contexto, traccionado por la suba del precio en Canadá, el mercado local se vio estimulado a incrementar el área de siembra, y así lo hizo, superando oficialmente las 100 mil hectáreas (Informe del INASE, 2022). Del citado informe surge, además que sólo 8 variedades dan cuenta del 85 % del total del área sembrada, y que una de ellas se siembra en más del 40 % de la superficie total. Por otro lado, es interesante destacar que la participación de las variedades amarillas sigue incrementándose anualmente y en la última campaña su proporción fue del 20 %, teniendo en cuenta que el mercado mundial es básicamente de este tipo de arvejas. Dado que en Argentina se vienen inscribiendo año tras año más variedades de arveja, es que se presentan en este trabajo el comportamiento agronómico de 13 variedades primaverales y 3 variedades invernales en 16 y 4 ambientes respectivamente, de la República Argentina.EEA OliverosFil: Prieto, Gabriel María. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia de Extensión Rural Arroyo Seco; ArgentinaFil: Alamo, Juan Facundo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Famaillá. Agencia de Extensión Rural Trancas; ArgentinaFil: Appella, Cristian Manuel. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow; ArgentinaFil: Avila, F. Consorcio Regional de Experimentación Agrícola (CREA); ArgentinaFil: Bobadilla, Segundo Evaristo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Esquel; ArgentinaFil: Casciani, Andres. Actividad Independiente; ArgentinaFil: Díaz Zorita, Martín. Universidad de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina.Fil: Dillchneider, Alexandra. Universidad Nacional de La Pampa. Facultad de Agronomía; Argentina.Fil: Espósito, María Andrea. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros; ArgentinaFil: Fariña, Leandro. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. Agencia Regional de Desarrollo Productivo; ArgentinaFil: Gallego, Juan José. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Valle Inferior de Río Negro; ArgentinaFil: Introna, Jimena. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Lázaro, Laura. Universidad Nacional del Noroeste de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (UNNOBA). Facultad de Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Lexow, Guillermo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Esquel; ArgentinaFil: Loto, Ariel Roberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia de Extensión Rural Arroyo Seco; ArgentinaFil: Maggio, J.C. Agrar del Sur; ArgentinaFil: Melin, Ariel Alejandro. Ministerio de Desarrollo Agrario Provincia de Buenos Aires. Chacra Experimental Coronel Suárez; ArgentinaFil: Mora, Julio Cesar. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Santa Cruz. Agencia de Extensión Rural Los Antiguos; ArgentinaFil: Neira Zilli, Fernanda. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Valle Inferior de Río Negro; ArgentinaFil: Nemoz, Juan Pablo. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Cuenca del Salado. Agencia de Extensión Rural Azul; ArgentinaFil: Prece, Natalia María. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Pergamino. Sección Agronomía; ArgentinaFil: Vita Larrieu, Eduardo Alberto. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Oliveros. Agencia de Extensión Rural Máximo Paz; ArgentinaFil: Zubillaga, María Fany. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA). Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Valle Inferior de Río Negro; Argentin

Fetal hemoglobin and the gamma G/gamma A chain ratio in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia L1 and L2 [Hemoglobina fetal y relación de cadenas gamma G/gamma A en niños con leucemia aguda linfoblástica L1 y L2.]

PURPOSE: To search in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) for specific pattern of expression of foetal haemoglobin (HbF) and its G gamma/A gamma chain ratio. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 children with ALL were examined: 29 with ALL-L1, and 31 with ALL-L2, and 25 healthy children as control group, which were subdivided in three groups: A) 0-5, B) 6-10 and C) 11-18 years. We performed HbF and HbA2 quantification and Hb electrophoresis. G gamma and A gamma globin chain percentages were obtained with a new method based on the precipitation of the HbF eluate by Singer's method with sulphosalycilic acid, the globin chains were separated in polyacrylamide with Triton X-100 and quantified by densitometry. RESULTS: HbF showed similar levels in both ALL groups by the Betke and Singer's methods; (ALL-L1: 2.2 +/- 1.5%, ALL-L2: 2.0 +/- 1.2%; and ALL-L1: 2.0 +/- 1.2%, ALL-L2: 2.1 +/- 1.5% respectively), but there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) when compared with the control group (0.9 +/- 0.4%, and 1.0 +/- 0.6% for Betke and Singer's method). The G gamma/A gamma ratio showed to be different between the ALL-L1 and ALL-L2 (p < 0.001), with higher levels of G gamma in ALL-L1 (51.0%), the ALL-L2 and the control group showed similar G gamma values (37.5% and 42.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: The factors involved in the increase of HbF are similar for both ALL-L1 and ALL-L2. However there seems to be different factors affecting the expression of G gamma or A gamma

Fetal hemoglobin and the gamma G/gamma A chain ratio in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia L1 and L2 [Hemoglobina fetal y relaci�n de cadenas gamma G/gamma A en ni�os con leucemia aguda linfobl�stica L1 y L2.]

PURPOSE: To search in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) for specific pattern of expression of foetal haemoglobin (HbF) and its G gamma/A gamma chain ratio. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 children with ALL were examined: 29 with ALL-L1, and 31 with ALL-L2, and 25 healthy children as control group, which were subdivided in three groups: A) 0-5, B) 6-10 and C) 11-18 years. We performed HbF and HbA2 quantification and Hb electrophoresis. G gamma and A gamma globin chain percentages were obtained with a new method based on the precipitation of the HbF eluate by Singer's method with sulphosalycilic acid, the globin chains were separated in polyacrylamide with Triton X-100 and quantified by densitometry. RESULTS: HbF showed similar levels in both ALL groups by the Betke and Singer's methods; (ALL-L1: 2.2 +/- 1.5%, ALL-L2: 2.0 +/- 1.2%; and ALL-L1: 2.0 +/- 1.2%, ALL-L2: 2.1 +/- 1.5% respectively), but there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.001) when compared with the control group (0.9 +/- 0.4%, and 1.0 +/- 0.6% for Betke and Singer's method). The G gamma/A gamma ratio showed to be different between the ALL-L1 and ALL-L2 (p < 0.001), with higher levels of G gamma in ALL-L1 (51.0%), the ALL-L2 and the control group showed similar G gamma values (37.5% and 42.1% respectively). CONCLUSION: The factors involved in the increase of HbF are similar for both ALL-L1 and ALL-L2. However there seems to be different factors affecting the expression of G gamma or A gamma

Complex interactions between nicotine and resveratrol in the Drosophila melanogaster wing spot test

Nicotine (NIC) and resveratrol (RES) are chemicals in tobacco and wine, respectively, that are widely consumed concurrently worldwide. NIC is an alkaloid known to be toxic, addictive and to produce oxidative stress, while RES is thought of as an antioxidant with putative health benefits. Oxidative stress can induce genotoxic damage, yet few studies have examined whether NIC is genotoxic in vivo. In vitro studies have shown that RES can ameliorate deleterious effects of NIC. However, RES has been reported to have both antioxidant and pro-oxidant effects, and an in vivo study reported that 0.011 mM RES was genotoxic. We used the Drosophila melanogaster wing spot test to determine whether NIC and RES, first individually and then in combination, were genotoxic and/or altered the cell division. We hypothesized that RES would modulate NIC's effects. NIC was genotoxic in the standard (ST) cross in a concentration-independent manner, but not genotoxic in the high bioactivation (HB) cross. RES was not genotoxic in either the ST or HB cross at the concentrations tested. We discovered a complex interaction between NIC and RES. Depending on concentration, RES was protective of NIC's genotoxic damage, RES had no interaction with NIC, or RES had an additive or synergistic effect, increasing NIC's genotoxic damage. Most NIC, RES, and NIC/RES combinations tested altered the cell division in the ST and HB crosses. Because we used the ST and HB crosses, we demonstrated that genotoxicity and cell division alterations were modulated by the xenobiotic metabolism. These results provide evidence of NIC's genotoxicity in vivo at specific concentrations. Moreover, NIC's genotoxicity can be modulated by its interaction with RES in a complex manner, in which their interaction can lead to either increasing NIC's damage or protecting against it. © 2022 The Author(s)Open access journalThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Pharmacology and preclinical validation of a novel anticancer compound targeting PEPCK-M

Background: Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) catalyzes the decarboxylation of oxaloacetate to phosphoenolpyruvate. The mitochondrial isozyme, PEPCK-M is highly expressed in cancer cells, where it plays a role in nutrient stress response. To date, pharmacological strategies to target this pathway have not been pursued. Methods: A compound embodying a 3-alkyl-1,8-dibenzylxanthine nucleus (iPEPCK-2), was synthesized and successfully probed in silico on a PEPCK-M structural model. Potency and target engagement in vitro and in vivo were evaluated by kinetic and cellular thermal shift assays (CETSA). The compound and its target were validated in tumor growth models in vitro and in murine xenografts. Results: Cross-inhibitory capacity and increased potency as compared to 3-MPA were confirmed in vitro and in vivo. Treatment with iPEPCK-2 inhibited cell growth and survival, especially in poor-nutrient environment, consistent with an impact on colony formation in soft agar. Finally, daily administration of the PEPCK-M inhibitor successfully inhibited tumor growth in two murine xenograft models as compared to vehicle, without weight loss, or any sign of apparent toxicity. Conclusion: We conclude that iPEPCK-2 is a compelling anticancer drug targeting PEPCK-M, a hallmark gene product involved in metabolic adaptations of the tumor.We acknowledge the skillful technical support by the Scientific and Technical Services at the University of Barcelona, Bellvitge Campus, and to the “Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya” (CSUC) for computational facilities