Improved outcomes in the treatment of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal defect with percutaneous TandemHeart left ventricular mechanical circulatory support

Background Post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular septal defect (VSD) is associated with 40% - 50% of peri-procedural mortalities; however, it is amenable to catheter-based therapies. We retrospectively investigated the impact of state-of-the-art bridging percutaneous left ventricular mechanical circulatory support (MCS) using the TandemHeart® (TH) ventricular assist device (VAD) on a patient with post-MI VSD. Results From July 2008 to March 2014, 23 patients were referred for treatment of post-MI VSD. Initially, 18/23 patients required MCS; 12 received an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), while 6 received initial TH support. Seven of the IABP patients later required TH support. Catheter-based device VSD closure was performed in 18 of the patients; however, three patients required conversion to conventional open cardiac surgical repair via VSD patch closure due to failure of the catheter-based approach. Five patients with TH underwent planned open cardiac surgical repair due to an anticipated lack of suitability for catheter-based treatment. Results revealed that delayed closure after MI correlated with improved survival. Overall, 30-day and 6-month survival rates were 83% (19/23) and 70% (16/23), respectively. Conclusions Further, Qp/Qs ratios of \u3c2.4 correlated with successful percutaneous VSD repair, and this assessment should be further explored as an assessment to inform clinical judgment in patients with post-MI VSD treatment

Adverse Events in Continuous-Flow LVAD Recipients: Gastrointestinal Bleeding is Still Notable?

Background: The etiology and risk factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are currently unknown. Therefore, we sought to assess the risk factors for GIB in these patients. Design and Methods: This was a retrospective, non-randomized, non-controlled study at a single center. Between 2012 and 2014, 65 men and 6 women (mean age = 55 ± 12 years) underwent CF-LVAD implantation at our institution. Overall, 23.9% of patients (17/71) had at least one GIB episode. Endoscopy confirmed GIB in 13/17. Arteriovenous malformation was the major GIB source in 8/13 (61%). There was no significant difference in incidence of GIB with regard to INTERMACS profile, blood type, or device type—HeartWare vs. HeartMateII. All our patients with GIB were men, most had hyperlipidemia, and most likely had ischemic cardiomyopathy (65%) and peripheral vascular disease (24%). The only significant risk factor for GIB was chronic kidney disease (odds ratio= 3.95; 95% confidence interval of 1.21 to 12.84; p=0.02). At the time of the first GIB, mean hemoglobin was 7.38 ± 1.06 g/dl, international normalized ratio was 2.08 ± 0.69 IU, and mean arterial pressure was 75 ± 12 mmHg. Ten patients (59%) required hospital admission for treatment. Conclusion: In our patients GIB was often a single event and often occurred within first month after implantation. Prevention strategies should be focused on this vulnerable period, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease

Incidental diagnosis of interrupted aortic arch in a 72-year-old man

WEB SITE FEATUR