Pin: building customized program analysis tools with dynamic instrumentation

Robust and powerful software instrumentation tools are essential for program analysis tasks such as profiling, performance evaluation, and bug detection. To meet this need, we have developed a new instrumentation system called Pin. Our goals are to provide easy-to-use, portable, transparent, and efficient instrumentation. Instrumentation tools (called Pintools) are written in C/C++ using Pin’s rich API. Pin follows the model of ATOM, allowing the tool writer to analyze an application at the instruction level without the need for detailed knowledge of the underlying instruction set. The API is designed to be architecture independent whenever possible, making Pintools source compatible across different architectures. However, a Pintool can access architecture-specific details when necessary. Instrumentation with Pin is mostly transparent as the application and Pintool observe the application’s original, uninstrumented behavior. Pin uses dynamic compilation to instrument executables while they are running. For efficiency, Pin uses several techniques, including inlining, register re-allocation, liveness analysis, and instruction scheduling to optimize instrumentation. This fully automated approach delivers significantly better instrumentation performance than similar tools. For example, Pin is 3.3x faster than Valgrind and 2x faster than DynamoRIO for basic-block counting. To illustrate Pin’s versatility, we describe two Pintools in daily use to analyze production software. Pin is publicly available for Linux platforms on four architectures: IA32 (32-bit x86), EM64T (64-bit x86), Itanium R ○ , and ARM. In the ten months since Pin 2 was released in July 2004, there have been over 3000 downloads from its website. Categories and Subject Descriptors D.2.5 [Software Engineering]: Testing and Debugging-code inspections and walk-throughs

The Concurrent Collections Programming Model

We introduce the Concurrent Collections (CnC) programming model. In this model, programs are written in terms of high-level operations. These operations are partially ordered according to only their semantic constraints. These partial orderings correspond to data dependences and control dependences. The role of the domain expert, whose interest and expertise is in the application domain, and the role of the tuning expert, whose interest and expertise is in performance on a specific architecture, can be viewed as separate concerns. The CnC programming model pro vides a high-level specification that can be used as a common language between the two experts, raising the level of their discourse. The model facilitates a significant degree of separation, which simplifies the task of the domain expert, who can focus on the application rather than scheduling concerns and mapping to the target architecture. This separation also simplifies the work of the tuning expert, who is given the maximum possible freedom to map the computation onto the target architecture and is not required to understand the details of the domain. However, the domain and tuning expert may still be the same person. We formally describe the execution semantics of CnC and prove that this model guarantees deterministic computation. We evaluate the performance of CnC implementations on several applications and show that CnC can effectively exploit several different kinds of parallelism and offer performance and scalability that is equivalent to or better than that offered by the current low-level parallel programming models. Further, with respect to ease of programming, we discuss the tradeoffs between CnC and other parallel program ming models on these applications

Concurrent Collections

We introduce the Concurrent Collections (CnC) programming model. CnC supports flexible combinations of task and data parallelism while retaining determinism. CnC is implicitly parallel, with the user providing high-level operations along with semantic ordering constraints that together form a CnC graph. We formally describe the execution semantics of CnC and prove that the model guarantees deterministic computation. We evaluate the performance of CnC implementations on several applications and show that CnC offers performance and scalability equivalent to or better than that offered by lower-level parallel programming models

Multilevel Parallelism and Locality-Aware Algorithms

Th is Synopsis of the PSC Petascale Applications Symposium: Multilevel Parallelism and Locality-Aware Algorithms edited, designed, and produced b