56 research outputs found

    Increase of sentinel lymph node melanoma staging in The Netherlands; still room and need for further improvement

    Get PDF
    Aim: To investigate implementation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and associations with socioeconomic status (SES). Patients & methods: Data from The Netherlands Cancer Registry on patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for all stage IB-II melanoma cases diagnosed 2010-2016, along with SES data from The Netherlands Institute for Social Research. Results: The proportion of SLNB-staged patients increased from 40% to 65% (p <0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that being female, elderly, or having head-and-neck disease reduced the likelihood of SLNB staging. Conclusion: SLNB staging increased by 25% during the study period but lagged among elderly patients and those with head-and-neck melanoma. In The Netherlands, SES no longer affects SLNB staging performance

    Treatment and survival of Merkel cell carcinoma since 1993: A population-based cohort study in The Netherlands

    No full text
    Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and potentially lethal skin cancer. MCC is known for its potential rapid growth and its propensity to metastasize. Objective: To describe the incidence, treatment, and survival of MCC in a population-based setting. Methods: All MCCs diagnosed in The Netherlands between 1993 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient and tumor characteristics, therapy, and vital status were obtained. Cox proportional hazards were computed, and relative survival analyses were performed. Results: Our cohort included 1977 patients with MCC. Incidence increased from 0.17 per 100,000 person-years in 1993 to 0.59 per 100,000 in 2016. The mean age at diagnosis was 75.5. Most MCCs (59.8%) were treated with surgery alone. Relative 5-year survival was low (63.0%) and did not improve. Mortality was higher among males (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.39), higher age (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.06-1.07), and nodal (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48) and distant spread of disease (HR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.99-2.99). Limitations: We lacked data on cause of death, comorbidity, and pathologic margins, which may have led to misinterpretation of the data. Conclusion: This study shows continuously increasing incidence rates of MCC in The Netherlands. Survival after a diagnosis of MCC remained low. Our results emphasize the need for implementation of new therapies

    Socioeconomic inequalities in attending the mass screening for breast cancer in the south of the Netherlands-associations with stage at diagnosis and survival

    No full text
    International audienceThe associations of socioeconomic status (SES) and participation in the breast cancer screening program, as well as consequences for stage of disease and prognosis were studied in the Netherlands, where no financial barriers for participating or health care use exist. From 1998 to 2005, 1,067,952 invitations for biennial mammography were sent to women aged 50-75 in the region covered by the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Screening attendance rates according to SES were calculated. Tumor stage and survival were studied according to SES group for patients diagnosed with breast cancer between 1998 and 2006, whether screen-detected, interval carcinoma or not attended screening at all. Attendance rates were rather high: 79, 85 and 87% in women with low, intermediate and high SES ( < 0.001), respectively. Compared to the low SES group, odds ratios for attendance were 1.5 (95%CI:1.5-1.6) for the intermediate SES group and 1.8 (95%CI:1.7-1.8) for the high SES group. Moreover, women with low SES had an unfavorable tumor-node-metastasis stage compared to those with high SES. This was seen in non-attendees, among women with interval cancers and with screen-detected cancers. Among non-attendees and interval cancers, the socioeconomic survival disparities were largely explained by stage distribution (48 and 35%) and to a lesser degree by therapy (16 and 16%). Comorbidity explained most survival inequalities among screen-detected patients (23%). Despite the absence of financial barriers for participation in the Dutch mass-screening program, socioeconomic inequalities in attendance rates exist, and women with low SES had a significantly worse tumor stage and lower survival rate

    Socioeconomic status and changing inequalities in colorectal cancer? A review of the associations with risk, treatment and outcome

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Upcoming mass screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) makes a review of recent literature on the association with socioeconomic status (SES) relevant, because of marked and contradictory associations with risk, treatment and outcome. METHODS: The Pubmed database using the MeSH terms 'Neoplasms' or 'Colorectal Neoplasms' and 'Socioeconomic Factors' for articles added between 1995 and 1st October 2009 led to 62 articles. RESULTS: Low SES groups exhibited a higher incidence compared with high SES groups in the US and Canada (range risk ratio (RR) 1.0-1.5), but mostly lower in Europe (RR 0.3-0.9). Treatment, survival and mortality all showed less favourable results for people with a lower socioeconomic status: Patients with a low SES received less often (neo)adjuvant therapy (RR ranging from 0.4 to 0.99), had worse survival rates (hazard ratio (HR) 1.3-1.8) and exhibited generally the highest mortality rates up to 1.6 for colon cancer in Europe and up to 3.1 for rectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A quite consistent trend was observed favouring individuals with a high SES compared to those with a low SES that still remains in terms of treatment, survival and thus also mortality. We did not find evidence that the low/high SES gradients for treatment chosen and outcome are decreasing. To meet increasing inequalities in mortality from CRC in Europe for people with a low SES and to make mass screening successful, a high participation rate needs to be realised of low SES people in the soon starting screening progra

    Implementation of the 7th edition AJCC staging system: Effects on staging and survival for pT1 melanoma. A Dutch population based study

    No full text
    In the 7th edition of the AJCC staging system, the mitotic rate criterion replaced Clark level to increase correct classification of high-risk thin melanoma patients (pT1B). Additionally, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was recommended for nodal staging of pT1B melanomas. The aim of this article was to evaluate the effects on pT1 substaging and clinical implications in the national pT1 melanoma population. All pT1 melanomas diagnosed in the Netherlands between 2003 and 2014 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (IKNL). Patients were stratified by cohort according to AJCC edition: (1) 2003-2009 (6th ) and (2) 2010-2014 (7th ). Relative survival was calculated to estimate melanoma-specific survival. A total of 29.546 pT1 melanoma patients were included. The pT1b proportion increased from 10.1% in Cohort 1 to 21.5% in Cohort 2. The proportion of performed SNBs per cohort increased: for pT1b melanomas alone from 4.5% to 13.0%. SNB positivity rate decreased from 10.5% to 8.8% for the entire pT1 population, and for pT1b melanomas from 11.3% to 8.6%. At 5 years, the relative survival rate was similar for pT1a and pT1b in both cohorts, namely, pT1a 100% vs pT1b 97% (Cohort 1), and pT1a 100% vs pT1b 98% (Cohort 2). The 7th edition of the AJCC staging system has caused an increased number of patients to undergo SNB, without an increase in SNB positivity rate. Survival between pT1 subgroups remains similar. The mitotic rate criterion for pT1b classification and the recommendation to perform SNB for pT1b melanomas should be reconsidered

    Sex matters : Men with melanoma have a worse prognosis than women

    No full text
    Background: In Europe, one of the highest melanoma incidences is found in the Netherlands. Like in several other European countries, females are more prone to develop melanoma as compared to males, although survival is worse for men. Objective: To identify clinicopathological gender-related differences that may lead to gender-specific preventive measures. Methods: Data from the Dutch Nationwide Network and Registry of Histopathology and Cytopathology (PALGA) were retrieved from patients with primary, cutaneous melanoma in the Netherlands between 2000 and 2014. Patients initially presenting as stage I, II and III without clinically detectable nodal disease were included. Follow-up data were retrieved from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Gender-related differences were assessed, and to compare relative survival between males and females, multivariable relative excess risks (RER) were calculated. Results: A total of 54.645 patients were included (43.7% men). In 2000, 41.7% of the cohort was male, as compared to 47.3% in 2014 (P < 0.001). Likewise, in 2000, 51.5% of the deceased cohort was male compared to 60.1% in 2014 (P < 0.001). Men had significantly thicker melanomas at the time of diagnosis [median Breslow thickness 1.00 mm (interquartile range (IQR): 0.60–2.00) vs. 0.82 mm (IQR: 0.50–1.50) for females] and were significantly older at the time of diagnosis, more often had ulcerated melanomas and melanomas localized on the trunk or head and neck. Over time, survival for females improved while that of men decreased (P < 0.001). RER for dying was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.31–1.45) for men in multivariable analysis. Conclusion: There are evident clinicopathological differences between male and female melanoma patients. After multivariable correction for all these differences, relative survival remains worse for men. Clinicians as well as persons at risk for melanoma should be aware of these differences, as awareness and prevention might lead to a lower incidence and mortality of melanoma. This indicates the need of prevention campaigns integrating and targeting specific risk profiles

    Childhood social class and cancer incidence: results of the globe study

    Get PDF
    Despite increased recognition of the importance of investigating socio-economic inequalities in health from a life course perspective, little is known about the influence of previous termchildhoodnext term socio-economic position (SEP) on previous termcancer incidence.next term The authors studied the association between father's occupation and adult previous termcancer incidencenext term by linking information from the longitudinal GLOBE study with the regional population-based Eindhoven previous termCancernext term Registry (the Netherlands) over a period of 14 years. In 1991, 18,973 participants (response rate 70.1%) of this study responded to a postal questionnaire, including questions on SEP in youth and adulthood. Respondents above the age of 24 were included (N = 12,978). Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) for all previous termcancersnext term as well as for the five most frequently occurring previous termcancersnext term by respondent's educational level or occupational previous termclass,next term and by father's occupational previous termclassnext term (adjusted for respondent's education and occupation). Respondents with a low educational level showed an increased risk of all previous termcancers,next term lung and breast previous termcancernext term (in women). Respondents with a low adult occupational level showed an increased risk of lung previous termcancernext term and a reduced risk of basal cell carcinoma. After adjustment for adult education and occupation, respondents whose father was in a lower occupational previous termclassnext term showed an increased risk of colorectal previous termcancernext term as compared to those with a father in the highest previous termsocial class.next term In contrast, respondents whose father was in a lower occupational previous termclass,next term showed a decreased risk of basal cell carcinoma as compared to those with a father in the highest occupational previous termclass.next term The association between previous termchildhoodnext term SEP and previous termcancer incidencenext term is less consistent than the association between adult SEP and previous termcancer incidence,next term but may exist for colorectal previous termcancernext term and basal cell carcinoma
    • 

    corecore