The Right PREMTM: Rasch analysis of a new patient reported experience measure for use by older people in hospital

Healthcare rights exist to protect older people from harm and to empower older people to participate in their care with independence, choice and control. Multiple investigations revealing abuse provide evidence that older people’s rights are being breached. Older people must have the opportunity to report on their experience of care against their rights. The Right PREMTM is a new instrument designed to measure older people’s experience of care against their healthcare rights. The objective of this cross-sectional validation study was to assess the psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure the experience of care consistent with the healthcare rights of older people in the hospital setting. Data were collected from older people who were current hospital inpatients of medical wards in four South Australian metropolitan hospitals. The Rasch model was used to assess the psychometric properties of the patient version of The Right PREMTM. The analysis was performed using the Winsteps® software program. Two hundred older patients completed the 50-item questionnaire. During the process of analysis, four items were removed as they did not fit the model and a further 11 items were removed due to high residual correlations. The final 23 items had a Person Separation Index of 2.23, a Person Separation Reliability Coefficient 0.83, an Item Separation Index of 7.70 and an Item Separation Reliability Coefficient of 0.98. Rasch analysis of the patient version of The Right PREMTM, based on a robust sample, demonstrated this new instrument is psychometrically sound and warrants ongoing development. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Policy & Measurement lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework. (https://www.theberylinstitute.org/ExperienceFramework). Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this lens

Evidence-based occupational therapy for people with dementia and their families: What clinical practice guidelines tell us and implications for practice

This author accepted manuscript (post print) is made available following a 12 month embargo from date of publication (3 October 2016) in accordance with the publisher copyright policy.Background: The first evidence based Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia in Australia have been released. The Guidelines detail a number of important evidence based recommendations for occupational therapists. Aim: The aim of this paper is (1) to provide an overview of Guideline development, and (2) to describe the evidence supporting a recommendation for occupational therapy. Common characteristics of effective occupational therapy programs for people with dementia are described. Methods: Guideline development involved adaptation of existing high quality guidelines developed overseas and 17 systematic reviews to ensure that the most recent high quality evidence was included. One of the systematic reviews involved examining the evidence for interventions to promote independence in people with dementia. Specifically, we looked at the evidence for occupational therapy and its effect on activities of daily living, quality of life and carer impact. Results: A total of 109 recommendations are included in the Guidelines. Occupational therapy was found to significantly increase independence in activities of daily living and improve quality of life. Effective occupational therapy programs involve: environmental assessment, problem solving strategies, carer education and interactive carer skills training. Conclusion: Occupational therapists working with people with dementia in community settings should ensure that their time is spent on those aspects of intervention that are shown to be effective

The relationship between in-hospital location and outcomes of care in patients diagnosed with dementia and/or delirium diagnoses: analysis of patient journey

Abstract Background The discrepancy between the number of admissions and the allocation of hospital beds means that many patients admitted to hospital can be placed in units or wards other than that which specialise in the patient’s primary health issue (home-ward). These patients are called ‘outlier’ patients. Risk factors and health system outcomes of hospital care for ‘outlier’ patients diagnosed with dementia and/or delirium are unknown. Therefore, the aim of this research was to examine patient journeys of people with dementia and/or delirium diagnoses, to identify risk factors for ‘inlier’ or ‘outlier’ status and patient or health system outcomes (consequences) of this status. Methods A retrospective, descriptive study compared patients who had dementia and/or delirium according to the proportion of time spent on the home ward i.e. ‘inliers’ or ‘outliers’. Data from the patient journey database at Flinders Medical Centre (FMC), a public hospital in South Australia from 2007 and 2014 were extracted and analysed. The analysis was carried out on the patient journeys of people with a dementia and/or delirium diagnosis. Results When 6367 inpatient journeys with dementia and/or delirium within FMC were examined, the Emergency Department (ED) Length of Stay (LOS) after being admitted as inpatient was prolonged for ‘outlier’ patients compared to ‘inlier’ patients (OR: 1.068, 95% CI: 1.057–1.079, p = 0.000). However, the inpatient LOS for’outlier’ patients was only marginally shorter than that of the ‘inlier’ patients (OR: 0.998, 95% CI: 0.998–0.998, p = 0.000). The chances of dying within 48 h of admission increased for ‘outlier’ patients (OR: 1.973, 95% CI: 1.158–3.359, p = 0.012) and their Charlson co-morbidity Index was higher (OR: 1.059, 95% CI: 1.021–1.10, p = 0.002). Completion of discharge summaries within 2 days post-discharge for ‘outlier’ patients was compromised (OR: 1.754, 95% CI: 1.492–2.061, p = 0.000).Additionally, ‘outlier’ patients were more likely to be discharged to another hospital for other care types not offered at FMC (OR: 1.931, 95% CI: 1.559–2.391, p = 0.000). Conclusion An examination of the patient journeys at FMC has determined that the health system outcomes for patients with dementia and/or delirium who are admitted outside of their home-ward are affected by in-hospital location despite the homogenous nature of the study population

Evidence-based occupational therapy for people with dementia and their families: What clinical practice guidelines tell us and implications for practice

Background/aim:The first evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia in Australia have been released. The Guidelines detail a number of important evidence-based recommendations for occupational therapists. The aim of this paper is (1) to provide an overview of Guideline development, and (2) to describe the evidence supporting a recommendation for occupational therapy. Common characteristics of effective occupational therapy programmes for people with dementia are described. Methods: Guideline development involved adaptation of existing high-quality guidelines developed overseas and 17 systematic reviews to ensure that the most recent high-quality evidence was included. One of the systematic reviews involved examining the evidence for interventions to promote independence in people with dementia. Specifically, we looked at the evidence for occupational therapy and its effect on activities of daily living, quality of life and carer impact. Results: A total of 109 recommendations are included in the Guidelines. Occupational therapy was found to significantly increase independence in activities of daily living and improve quality of life. Effective occupational therapy programmes involve: environmental assessment, problem solving strategies, carer education and interactive carer skills training. Conclusion: Occupational therapists working with people with dementia in community settings should ensure that their time is spent on those aspects of intervention that are shown to be effective. KEY WORDS:Alzheimer disease, Evidence-based practice, knowledge translation, practice guidelin