Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma After Progression to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis by the Meet-Uro Group (Meet-URO 1 Study)

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the standard of care for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) after the failure of previous platinum-based chemotherapy. The choice of further therapy after ICI progression is a new challenge, and scarce data support it. We aimed to examine the outcomes of mUC patients after progression to ICI, especially when receiving chemotherapy. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from clinical records of mUC patients whose disease progressed to anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy at 14 Italian centers. Patients were grouped according to ICI therapy setting into SALVAGE (ie, ICI delivered ⩾ second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy) and NAÏVE (ie, first-line therapy) groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among subgroups. Cox regression assessed the effect of treatments after progression to ICI on OS. Objective response rate (ORR) was calculated as the sum of partial and complete radiologic responses. Results: The study population consisted of 201 mUC patients who progressed after ICI: 59 in the NAÏVE cohort and 142 in the SALVAGE cohort. Overall, 52 patients received chemotherapy after ICI progression (25.9%), 20 (9.9%) received ICI beyond progression, 115 (57.2%) received best supportive care only, and 14 (7.0%) received investigational drugs. Objective response rate to chemotherapy in the post-ICI setting was 23.1% (28.0% in the NAÏVE group and 18.5% in the SALVAGE group). Median PFS and OS to chemotherapy after ICI-PD was 5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-11) and 13 months (95% CI: 7-NA) for the NAÏVE group; 3 months (95% CI: 2-NA) and 9 months (95% CI: 6-NA) for the SALVAGE group, respectively. Overall survival from ICI initiation was 17 months for patients receiving chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.09, p < 0.001), versus 8 months for patients receiving ICI beyond progression (HR = 0.13, p < 0.001), and 2 months for patients who did not receive further active treatment (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Chemotherapy administered after ICI progression for mUC patients is advisable irrespective of the treatment line

Intrafascicular peripheral nerve stimulation produces fine functional hand movements in primates.

Restoring dexterous hand control is critical for people with paralysis. Approaches based on surface or intramuscular stimulation provide limited finger control, generate insufficient force to recover functional movements, and require numerous electrodes. Here, we show that intrafascicular peripheral electrodes could produce functional grasps and sustained forces in three monkeys. We designed an intrafascicular implantable electrode targeting the motor fibers of the median and radial nerves. Our interface selectively and reliably activated extrinsic and intrinsic hand muscles, generating multiple functional grips, hand opening, and sustained contraction forces for up to 2 months. We extended those results to a behaving monkey with transient hand paralysis and used intracortical signals to control simple stimulation protocols that enabled this animal to perform a functional grasping task. Our findings show that just two intrafascicular electrodes can generate a rich portfolio of dexterous and functional hand movements with important implications for clinical applicability

Real world data from the Italian expanded access program (EAP): updated safety and efficacy results of nivolumab for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

Background: Nivolumab is an anti-PD1 monoclonal antibody that has shown efficacy in patients (pts) with different tumor types and is the first checkpoint inhibitor to show a survival benefit in a randomised phase III trial in pre-treated mRCC. The experience of pts and physicians in routine clinical practice is often different from those in a controlled clinical trial setting. The EAP provided the opportunity to treat patients (pts) in real world clinical practice before market availability of the drug. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab in a real world setting in pts with mRCC treated in the nivolumab Expanded Access Programme in Italy. Materials and Methods: Nivolumab was available upon physician request for pts aged ≥18 years who had relapsed after a minimum of one prior systemic treatment for mRCC. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks. Pts included in the analysis had received ≥ 1 dose of nivolumab and were monitored for adverse events using CTCAE v.4.0. Results: Totally, 389 pts were enrolled in the EAP across 95 Italian sites. Preliminary efficacy and safety data of this population have been submitted to ASCO 2017. We will present updated results with a longer follow-up. The final abstract will report the updated results above efficacy and safety

Role of Bone Metastases in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy for Pre-Treated Urothelial Carcinoma: The Multicentre, Retrospective Meet-URO-1 Bone Study

Background: Considerable numbers of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) develop bone metastases (BoM). Their impact on the efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not yet investigated. Methods: Between July 2014 and August 2020 data on pts treated with single-agent ICIs after failure of at least 1 previous line of chemotherapy for advanced disease, were retrospectively collected across 14 Italian centers. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed evaluating potential prognostic factors for OS and PFS. Each factor was evaluated in univariable (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA). Results: A total of 208 evaluable patients treated with ICIs were identified, including 122 (59%) without BoM (BoM-) and 86 (41%) with bone metastases (BoM+). After a median follow-up of 22.3 months, BoM+ patients showed shorter OS (median 3.9 vs 7.8 months, HR 1.59 [95%CI, 1.15-2.20], P = .005) and shorter PFS (median 2.0 vs 2.6 months, HR 1.76 [95%CI, 1.31-2.37], P < .001). Probability of being alive was 62% vs 40% after 6 months, 38% vs 23% after 1 year and 24% vs 13% after 2 years, in BoM- and BoM+ respectively. Within each Bellmunt score, OS and PFS of BoM+ patients were shorter. Both presence of BoM and higher Bellmunt risk score were significantly associated with shorter OS and PFS in UVA and MVA. Conclusion: Patients treated with single-agent ICIs for BoM+ mUC have a dismal prognosis compared to BoM-. Further research is needed to understand the mechanism behind these outcomes

Osimertinib

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated (exons 18-21) advanced non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are generally characterized by exquisite sensitivity to treatment with an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (-TKI). First-generation or reversible EGFR-TKIs include gefitinib and erlotinib, while, more recently, second-generation or irreversible EGFR-TKIs have been developed, namely afatinib and dacomitinib, with the aim of overcoming/delaying acquired resistance to treatment. Nevertheless, clinical trials have shown that resistance eventually emerges after a median time of slightly less than one year, regardless of whether first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs are used. In this context, a secondary EGFR mutation in exon 20, namely T790M, has been found to be responsible for approximately 60% of cases of acquired resistance. Alternatively, T790M resistance mutation can be found de novo, in which case it limits the antitumor activity of both first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs. Osimertinb is an orally bioavailable, third-generation EGFR-TKI that acts by irreversibly binding both EGFR activating mutations and T790M, while sparing wild-type EGFR. On this basis, osimertinib has proven more efficacious than platinum-based chemotherapy in the setting of EGFR T790M-positive NSCLCs pretreated with a first- or second-generation EGFR-TKI. More recently, in another phase 3 trial, osimertinib outperformed gefitinib or erlotinib as first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated (ex19del or L858R) advanced NSCLCs, thus emerging as a new standard of care in this setting. In the present review, we will discuss the preclinical and clinical development of osimertinib, briefly touching upon its activity in special populations and biomarkers of sensitivity to treatment