61,029 research outputs found

    A Layman's guide to SUSY GUTs

    Full text link
    The determination of the most straightforward evidence for the existence of the Superworld requires a guide for non-experts (especially experimental physicists) for them to make their own judgement on the value of such predictions. For this purpose we review the most basic results of Super-Grand unification in a simple and clear way. We focus the attention on two specific models and their predictions. These two models represent an example of a direct comparison between a traditional unified-theory and a string-inspired approach to the solution of the many open problems of the Standard Model. We emphasize that viable models must satisfy {\em all} available experimental constraints and be as simple as theoretically possible. The two well defined supergravity models, SU(5)SU(5) and SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1), can be described in terms of only a few parameters (five and three respectively) instead of the more than twenty needed in the MSSM model, \ie, the Minimal Supersymmetric extension of the Standard Model. A case of special interest is the strict no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity where all predictions depend on only one parameter (plus the top-quark mass). A general consequence of these analyses is that supersymmetric particles can be at the verge of discovery, lurking around the corner at present and near future facilities. This review should help anyone distinguish between well motivated predictions and predictions based on arbitrary choices of parameters in undefined models.Comment: 25 pages, Latex, 11 figures (not included), CERN-TH.7077/93, CTP-TAMU-65/93. A complete ps file (1.31MB) with embedded figures is available by request from [email protected]

    New Precision Electroweak Tests of SU(5) x U(1) Supergravity

    Full text link
    We explore the one-loop electroweak radiative corrections in SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity via explicit calculation of vacuum-polarization and vertex-correction contributions to the ϵ1\epsilon_1 and ϵb\epsilon_b parameters. Experimentally, these parameters are obtained from a global fit to the set of observables Γl,Γb,AFBl\Gamma_{l}, \Gamma_{b}, A^{l}_{FB}, and MW/MZM_W/M_Z. We include q2q^2-dependent effects, which induce a large systematic negative shift on ϵ1\epsilon_{1} for light chargino masses (m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lsim70\GeV). The (non-oblique) supersymmetric vertex corrections to \Zbb, which define the ϵb\epsilon_b parameter, show a significant positive shift for light chargino masses, which for tanβ2\tan\beta\approx2 can be nearly compensated by a negative shift from the charged Higgs contribution. We conclude that at the 90\%CL, for m_t\lsim160\GeV the present experimental values of ϵ1\epsilon_1 and ϵb\epsilon_b do not constrain in any way SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity in both no-scale and dilaton scenarios. On the other hand, for m_t\gsim160\GeV the constraints on the parameter space become increasingly stricter. We demonstrate this trend with a study of the m_t=170\GeV case, where only a small region of parameter space, with \tan\beta\gsim4, remains allowed and corresponds to light chargino masses (m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lsim70\GeV). Thus SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity combined with high-precision LEP data would suggest the presence of light charginos if the top quark is not detected at the Tevatron.Comment: LaTeX, 11 Pages+4 Figures(not included), the figures available upon request as an uuencoded file(0.4MB) or 4 PS files from [email protected], CERN-TH.7078/93, CTP-TAMU-68/93, ACT-24/9

    SUSY signals at HERA in the no-scale flipped SU(5) supergravity model

    Full text link
    Sparticle production and detection at HERA are studied within the recently proposed no-scale flipped SU(5)SU(5) supergravity model. Among the various reaction channels that could lead to sparticle production at HERA, only the following are within its limit of sensitivity in this model: epe~L,Rχi0+X,ν~eχ1+Xe^-p\to \tilde e^-_{L,R}\chi^0_i+X, \tilde \nu_e\chi^-_1+X, where χi0(i=1,2)\chi^0_i(i=1,2) are the two lightest neutralinos and χ1\chi^-_1 is the lightest chargino. We study the elastic and deep-inelastic contributions to the cross sections using the Weizs\"acker-Williams approximation. We find that the most promising supersymmetric production channel is right-handed selectron (e~R\tilde e_{R}) plus first neutralino (χ10\chi^0_1), with one hard electron and missing energy signature. The ν~eχ1\tilde\nu_e\chi^-_1 channel leads to comparable rates but also allows jet final states. A right-handedly polarized electron beam at HERA would shut off the latter channel and allow preferentially the former one. With an integrated luminosity of {\cal L}=100\ipb, HERA can extend the present LEPI lower bounds on me~R,mν~e,mχ10m_{\tilde e_R}, m_{\tilde\nu_e},m_{\chi^0_1} by \approx25\GeV, while {\cal L}=1000\ipb will make HERA competitive with LEPII. We also show that the Leading Proton Spectrometer (LPS) at HERA is an excellent supersymmetry detector which can provide indirect information about the sparticle masses by measuring the leading proton longitudinal momentum distribution.Comment: 11 pages, 8 figures (available upon request as uuencoded file or separate ps files), tex (harvmac) CTP-TAMU-15/93, CERN/LAA/93-1

    M-theory Inspired No-scale Supergravity

    Get PDF
    We propose a supergravity model that contains elements recently shown to arise in the strongly-coupled limit of the E8×E8E_8\times E_8 heterotic string (M-theory), including a no-scale--like K\"ahler potential, the identification of the string scale with the gauge coupling unification scale, and the onset of supersymmetry breaking at an intermediate scale determined by the size of the eleventh dimension of M-theory. We also study the phenomenological consequences of such scenario, which include a rather constrained sparticle spectrum within the reach of present-generation particle accelerators.Comment: 8 pages, LaTeX, 3 figures (included

    New Precision Electroweak Tests in Supergravity Models

    Get PDF
    We update the analysis of the precision electroweak tests in terms of 4 epsilon parameters, ϵ1,2,3,b\epsilon_{1,2,3,b}, to obtain more accurate experimental values of them by taking into account the new LEP data released at the 28th ICHEP (1996, Poland). We also compute ϵ1\epsilon_1 and ϵb\epsilon_b in the context of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model to obtain the updated constraints by imposing the correlated constraints in terms of the experimental ellipses in the ϵ1ϵb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b plane and also by imposing the new bound on the lightest chargino mass, mχ1±79m_{\chi^\pm_1}\gtrsim 79 GeV GeV. Upon imposing these new experimental results, we find that the situations in the no-scale model are much more favorable than those in the standard model, and if mt170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, then the allowed regions at the 95% C.~L. in the no-scale model are tanβ4\tan\beta\gtrsim 4 and mχ1±120(82)m_{\chi^\pm_1}\lesssim 120 (82) GeV GeV for μ>0(μ<0)\mu>0 (\mu<0), which are in fact much more stringent than in our previous analysis. Therefore, assuming that mt170m_t\gtrsim 170 GeV GeV, if the lightest chargino mass bound were to be pushed up only by a few GeV, the sign on the Higgs mixing term μ\mu in the no-scale model could well be determined from the ϵ1ϵb\epsilon_1-\epsilon_b constraint to be positive at the 95% C.~L. At any rate, better accuracy in the measured mtm_t from the Tevatron in the near future combined with the LEP data is most likely to provide a decisive test of the no-scale SU(5)×U(1)SU(5)\times U(1) supergravity model.Comment: 15 pages, REVTEX, 1 figure (not included but available as a ps file from [email protected]
    corecore