AGREE: an upper-limb robotic platform for personalized rehabilitation, concept and clinical study design

: Rehabilitation exoskeletons can supplement therapist-based training allowing post-stroke patients to perform functional, high-dosage, repetitive exercises. The use of robotic devices allows providing intense rehabilitation sessions and permits clinicians to personalize the therapy according to the patient's need. In this work, we propose an upper-limb rehabilitation system developed within the AGREE project. The platform relies on a four degrees-of-freedom arm exoskeleton, capable of assisting state-of-the-art rehabilitation exercises under different training modalities while behaving transparently to user-generated and therapist-applied forces. The system is provided with a LEDs-matrix mat to guide patients during reaching tasks with visual feedback, an EMG reader to evaluate the patient's involvement during the therapy, and several software tools to help clinicians customize the treatment and monitor the patient's progress. A randomized controlled pilot study aimed at evaluating the usability and the effectiveness of the AGREE rehabilitation platform to improve arm impairment after stroke is currently ongoing

Test-retest reliability of the Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) module for muscular dystrophy patients.

The Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL) module is an externally-assessed clinical scale, initially designed for the Duchenne muscular dystrophy population. It provides an upper extremity functional score suitable for both weaker ambulatory and non-ambulatory phases up to the severely impaired patients. It is capable of characterizing overall progression and severity of disease and of tracking the stereotypical proximal-to-distal progressive loss of upper limb function in muscular dystrophy. Since the PUL module has been validated only with Duchenne patients, its use also for Becker and Limb-Girdle muscular dystrophy patients has been here evaluated, to verify its reliability and extend its use. In particular, two different assessors performed this scale on 32 dystrophic subjects in two consecutive days. The results showed that the PUL module has high reliability, both absolute and relative, based on the calculation of Pearson's r (0.9942), Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (0.9943), Standard Error of Measurement (1.36), Minimum Detectable Change (3.77), and Coefficient of Variation (3%). The Minimum Detectable Change, in particular, can be used in clinical trials to perform a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation of the effects of interventions with the lapse of time. According to this analysis, an intervention is effective if the difference in the PUL score between subsequent evaluation points is equal or higher than 4 points; otherwise, the observed effect is not relevant. Inter-rater reliability with ten different assessors was evaluated, and it has been demonstrated that deviation from the mean is lower than calculated Minimum Detectable Change. The present work provides evidence that the PUL module is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring upper limb ability in people with different forms of muscular dystrophy. Therefore, the PUL module might be extended to other pathologies and reliably used in multicenter settings