6 research outputs found
Is Meaning in Life a Positive Resource When Adjusting to Stressful Life Events?
Having a sense of meaning in life is often considered to be a positive resource that can facilitate better adjustment to major stressors. However, few studies have directly and adequately examined this idea. The present study addresses this question by examining 1) if meaning predicts trajectories and changes in key distress-exacerbating factors and distress 2) if meaning buffers negative effects of distress-exacerbating factors on distress, and 3) if the different dimensions of meaning are differentially important in adjustment. The sample consisted of 180 undergraduates prescreened to have had a recent stressor that they found stressful at prescreening. Participants were assessed at four time points over a 9-week period with three weeks in between each time point. At baseline, participants completed a measure of meaning; at all time points, participants completed measures of key distress-exacerbating factors and distress. Overall, results provided some evidence of meaning as a positive resource in adjustment. HLM analyses of adjustment trajectories showed that those with higher baseline meaning had better adjustment at baseline, although those with lower meaning seemed to catch up over time. Residual change regression models showed meaning to predict favorable changes in distress-exacerbating factors and distress. Moderation analyses showed meaning to buffer the negative effects of distress-exacerbating factors on distress. Finally, the meaning dimension of comprehension appeared to be relatively more important in adjustment than were purpose and mattering. These results have implications such as greater support for clinical interventions aimed at fostering meaning, and the need for more multidimensional examinations of meaning
“My Family Wants Something Different”: Discordance in Perceived Personal and Family Treatment Preference and Its Association With Do-Not-Resuscitate Order Placement
Examining the relationship between trauma centrality and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A moderated mediation approach.
Managing family conflict over career decisions: The experience of Asian Americans
Conflict over career decisions is a main source of intergenerational conflict among Asian American families. This qualitative study explored the topic using consensual qualitative research methodology in a sample of eight Asian Americans. Results indicated that participants experienced feelings of guilt and indebtedness due to conflicting values, traditions, and expectations. Most participants dealt with parental disapproval regarding their career choice by seeking advice from friends and relatives. Participants employed many strategies to earn approval such as educating parents about their chosen career, seeking honors, and compromising between personal desires and parental expectations. Implications for career counseling and research are discussed