CD59 blocks not only the insertion of C9 into MAC but inhibits ion channel formation by homologous C5b-8 as well as C5b-9

Activation of the complement system on the cell surface results in the insertion of pore forming membrane attack complexes (MAC, C5b-9). In order to protect themselves from the complement attack, the cells express several regulatory molecules, including the terminal complex regulator CD59 that inhibits assembly of the large MACs by inhibiting the insertion of additional C9 molecules into the C5b-9 complex. Using the whole cell patch clamp method, we were able to measure accumulation of homologous MACs in the membrane of CD59− human B-cells, which formed non-selective ion channels with a total conductance of 360 ± 24 pS as measured at the beginning of the steady-state phase of the inward currents. C5b-8 and small-size MAC (MAC containing only a single C9) can also form ion channels. Nevertheless, in CD59+ human B-cells in spite of small-size MAC formation, an ion current could not be detected. In addition, restoring CD59 to the membrane of the CD59− cells inhibited the serum-evoked inward current. The ion channels formed by the small-size MAC were therefore sealed, indicating that CD59 directly interfered with the pore formation of C5b-8 as well as that of small-size C5b-9. These results offer an explanation as to why CD59-expressing cells are not leaky in spite of a buildup of homologous C5b-8 and small-size MAC. Our experiments also confirmed that ion channel inhibition by CD59 is subject to homologous restriction and that CD59 cannot block the conductivity of MAC when generated by xenogenic (rabbit) serum

Efficacy and safety of tenecteplase in combination with enoxaparin, abciximab, or unfractionated heparin: The ASSENT-3 randomised trial in acute myocardial infarction

Background: Current fibrinolytic therapies fail to achieve optimum reperfusion in many patients. Low-molecular-weight heparins and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown the potential to improve pharmacological reperfusion therapy. We did a randomised, open-label trial to compare the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase plus enoxaparin or abciximab, with that of tenecteplase plus weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods: 6095 patients with acute myocardial infarction of less than 6 h were randomly assigned one of three regimens: full-dose tenecteplase and enoxaparin for a maximum of 7 days (enoxaparin group; n=2040), half-dose tenecteplase with weight-adjusted low-dose unfractionated heparin and a 12-h infusion of abciximab (abciximab group; n=2017), or full-dose tenecteplase with weight-adjusted unfractionated heparin for 48 h (unfractionated heparin group; n=2038). The primary endpoints were the composites of 30-day mortality, in-hospital reinfarction, or in-hospital refractory ischaemia (efficacy endpoint), and the above endpoint plus in-hospital intracranial haemorrhage or in-hospital major bleeding complications (efficacy plus safety endpoint). Analysis was by intention to treat. Findings: There were significantly fewer efficacy endpoints in the enoxaparin and abciximab groups than in the unfractionated heparin group: 233/2037 (11.4%) versus 315/2038 (15.4%; relative risk 0.74 [95% CI 0.63-0.87], p=0.0002) for enoxaparin, and 223/2017 (11.1%) versus 315/2038 (15.4%; 0.72 [0.61-0.84], p<0.0001) for abciximab. The same was true for the efficacy plus safety endpoint: 280/2037 (13.7%) versus 347/2036 (17.0%; 0.81 [0.70-0.93], p=0.0037) for enoxaparin, and 287/2016 (14.2%) versus 347/2036 (17.0%; 0.84 [0.72-0.96], p=0.01416) for abciximab. Interpretation: The tenecteplase plus enoxaparin or abciximab regimens studied here reduce the frequency of ischaemic complications of an acute myocardial infarction. In light of its ease of administration, tenecteplase plus enoxaparin seems to be an attractive alternative reperfusion regimen that warrants further study