9 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° Π² ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ·Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°
In recent decades, an increase in the incidence of ulcerative colitis has been observed throughout the world. The purpose of this review is to generalize the available information on the influence of environmental factors and intestinal microbiome on the occurrence and development of ulcerative colitis, the role of bacteria metabolism products in the pathogenesis of the disease. Studied literature, we came to the conclusion that lifestyle in the era of post-industrial society has a significant impact on the microbial composition of the intestine and leads to changes in its diversity in patients suffering from ulcerative colitis. The changes include a decrease in the number of residential flora with anti-inflammatory activity, which synthesize short-chain fatty acids, and an increase in the number of potentially pathogenic and pathogenic microorganisms. Within the phylums Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, the proportional ratio changes. The combination of aggression factors (deterioration of the intestinal microbiome composition, the presence of aggressive intestinal metabolites) leads to intestinal mucosa permeability disfunction, impairing its barrier function. Food and bacterial agents can penetrate deeper layers of the intestinal wall through mucosal defects, which then stimulate the development of inflammatory and immune responses.Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡΠ° ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ·Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ°, ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ ΡΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΠ·ΡΡΠΈΠ² Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΠΌΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π· ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π² ΡΠΏΠΎΡ
Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΡΡΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΠ·Π°ΠΆ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π·ΠΈΡ Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
, ΡΡΡΠ°Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΠ·Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ, Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π° ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ, ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π·ΠΈΡΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΆΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΈΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ, ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΠ»Π° ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ². ΠΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠΌΠΎΠ² Firmicutes ΠΈ Proteobacteria ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π°Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ (Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π° ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°, Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ Π°Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²) ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ ΠΊ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΆΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π΅Π΅ Π±Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΡΠ½ΠΊΡΠΈΡ. Π§Π΅ΡΠ΅Π· Π΄Π΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΡ ΡΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π³Π»ΡΠ±ΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΠΈΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ ΠΈ Π±Π°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π°Π³Π΅Π½ΡΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΡΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈΜ
ΠΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Ρ Π»ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ Ρ Helicobacter pylori: ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ° 2020β2021 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²
Objective: To assess compliance of physicians with diagnostic and management guidelines for H. pylori-associated diseases with a question-naire-based survey.Materials and methods: We conducted an anonymous voluntary online survey of 775 physicians of the following specialties: internal medicine 459 (59.2%), gastroenterology 279 (36%), and endoscopy 34 (4.4%). The respondents expressed their level of agreement with the questionnaire items as follows: 0 β I do not know, 1 β disagree, 2 β partially agree, and 3 β fully agree.Results: 613 (79.4%) of the physicians fully agreed to diagnose and treat H. pylori in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, 602 (78.0%) in the 1 st degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, 525 (68.0%) in patients with chronic superficial gastritis, 423 (54.8%) in peptic ulcer at remission, and 336 (43.4%) in those with dyspepsia syndrome. The physicians were equally compliant with eradication therapy in the patients, for whom long term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is being planned (386 (50.0%) and 397 (51.4%), respectively). Internists were less compliant with diagnosis and management of H. pylori in patients taking both PPI (Ο2 = 66.525, p = 0.004) and NSAID (Ο2 = 103.354, p = 0.003). Among the primary diagnostic tools for H. pylori the physicians preferred 13/14Π‘-urease breath test (545 physicians, or 70.6%) and gastric bioptate morphology (574, or 74.4%), and among the control diagnostic methods they chose fΠ°eces analyses (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction). The respondents considered bismuth-enhanced standard triple therapy with clarithromycin to be the most effective regimen for the 1 st line eradication therapy (606, 78.5%). To increase the efficacy of eradication therapy, the physicians were more prone to administer esomeprazole or rabeprazole (70.6%), bismuth-based agents (79.4%), than to use rebamipid (35%), probiotics (44.9%) and/or to double PPI doses (44.2%). The respondents expressed their concerns with low patient compliance to treatment (59.4%) and limited diagnostic capabilities (49.4%).Conclusion: Physician's compliance with the guidelines on diagnosis and management of H. pylori-associated diseases is adequate and might depend on both their awareness and availability of the proposed diagnostic and therapeutic methods.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ β ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Helicobacter pylori-Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½-Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 775 Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ: 459 (59,2%) Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Β«ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΒ», 279 (36%) β Β«Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΒ», 34 (4,4%) β Β«ΡΠ½Π΄ΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΒ». Π£ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π² Π±Π°Π»Π»Π°Ρ
: Β«0Β» β Π½Π΅ Π·Π½Π°Ρ, Β«1Β» β Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ΅Π½, Β«2Β» β ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈ Β«3Β» β ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ΅Π½.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠΈΡΡ H. pylori Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ 613 (79,4%) Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, Ρ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² 1-ΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΠ²Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡΠ΄ΠΊΠ° β 602 (78,0%), Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡ
Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ β 525 (68,0%), Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ·Π²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΈ β 423 (54,8%), ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΠΈ β 336 (43,4%). Π ΡΠ°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΊ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ (ΠΠΠ) ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΈΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² (ΠΠΠΠ) β 386 (50,0%) ΠΈ 397 (51,4%) ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ. Π’Π΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΡ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ H. pylori ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΠΠ (Ο2 = 66,525, p = 0,004), ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΠΠΠ (Ο2 = 103,354, p = 0,003). Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ H. pylori Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ 13/14Π‘-ΡΡΠ΅Π°Π·Π½ΡΠΉ Π΄ΡΡ
Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ (545 (70,6%) Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ) ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³Π°ΡΡΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠ° (574 (74,4%)), Π° Π² ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
β Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ ΠΊΠ°Π»Π° (ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π·Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΡ). ΠΠ°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΡ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΈΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠΌΡΡΠΎΠΌ (606 (78,5%)). Π ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π² ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠ°Ρ
ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ·ΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΠΏΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ» ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π±Π΅ΠΏΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΠ» (70,6%), Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΠΌΡΡΠ° (79,4%), ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡ
Π΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π±Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΄ (35%), ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ (44,9%) ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΄Π²Π°ΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρ ΠΠΠ (44,2%). Π Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΊ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (59,4%) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ (49,4%).ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π² ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ H. pylori-Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½Π° ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΌΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΉ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΈ Π»Π΅ΡΠ΅Π±Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²
The need to strengthen measures for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Russia. Memorandum
Leonid B. Lazebnik, PhD, Doctor of Medical Scienses, Professor, Department of Polyclinic Therapy; President of Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia; Vise President of Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists; Scopus Author ID: 7005446863, ORCID: 0000-0001-8736-5851 Dmitry S. Bordin, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Pancreatic, Biliary and upper digestive tract disorders; professor of the department of general practice (family medicine); professor of the department of propaedeutics of internal diseases and gastroenterology; ORCID: 0000-0003-2815-3992 Nataliya N. Dekhnich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Faculty Therapy; ORCID: 0000-0002-6144-3919 Roman S. Kozlov, Professor, Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Science, Director, Institution of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; chief freelance specialist-therapist of the Ministry of Health of Russia for the Siberian Federal District, professor Mariya A. Livzan, D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Rector, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy, Occupational Diseases; ORCID: 0000-0002-6581-7017, Scopus Author ID: 24341682600 Elena A. Lyalyukova, PhD, MD, Professor of the Department of additional postgraduate education in internal and family medicine, Associate Professor; WoS Research ID: AAB -5416-2021, Scopus Author ID: 56657486600, ORCID: 0000-0003-4878-0838 Svetlana V. Luzina, Deputy Chief physician for Medical Part Galina V. Belova, MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy chief physician; Scopus Author ID: 57198379175 Rustem A. Abdulkhakov, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy, Kazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Professor; ORCID: 0000-0002-1509-6776, Scopus Author ID: 6506615710 Sayyar R. Abdulkhakov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Fundamental Foundations of Clinical Medicine; Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology; Associate Professor, Department of General Medical Practice and Polyclinic Therapy; assistant professor
Russian consensus on exo-and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgical treatment
The Russian consensus on exo- and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgical treatment was prepared on the initiative of the Russian Pancreatic Club using the Delphi method. Its goal was to consolidate the opinions of national experts on the most relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of exo- and endocrine insufficiency after surgical interventions on the pancreas. An interdisciplinary approach is ensured by the participation of leading gastroenterologists and surgeons
The first Russian consensus on quantitative assessment of treatment outcome
The first Russian Consensus on the quantitative evaluation of treatment results was approved by the XIII National Congress of therapists (Moscow, November 21-23, 2018). Β© 2019, Stavropol State Medical University. All rights reserved
ΠΠΠ ΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠ‘Π‘ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ‘Π£Π‘ ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠ£ΠΠ¬Π’ΠΠ’ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ₯ ΠΠΠΠ¨ΠΠ’ΠΠΠ¬Π‘Π’Π
The first Russian Consensus on the quantitative evaluation of treatment results was approved by the XIII National Congress of therapists (Moscow, November 21-23, 2018).ΠΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠΉ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ² ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½ XIII ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅Π²ΡΠΎΠ² (Π³. ΠΠΎΡΠΊΠ²Π°, 21-23 Π½ΠΎΡΠ±ΡΡ 2018 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°)
Management of adherence-based treatment. Consensus document β Clinical guidelines. English version [ΡΠΏΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ ΠΏΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π. ΠΠΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ‘ΡΠ‘ΠΠ«ΠΉ ΠΠΠΡΠΠΠΠ’ β ΠΠΠΠΠΠ§ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠ Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ. ΠΠΠΠΠΠ―Π·Π«Π§ΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠ Π‘ΠΠ―]
Consensus Document Β«Management of adherence-based treatmentΒ» developed based on clinical guidelines of Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine approved by the XIV National Congress of physicians (Moscow, 20 November 2019). The document is intended primarily to assess adherence to drug therapy, adherence to lifestyle modification, and adherence to medical support for patients who need long-term or permanent treatment. The documentβs authors considered the treatment adherence unanimously as the compliance of the patientβs behavior with the recommendations received from the Doctor regarding medication, dieting, and other measures of lifestyle modifications. Insufficient adherence to treatment is a global problem. Assessing adherence as a basis for making medical decisions is an essential element of improving the quality of the healthcare system. Predictions of treatment outcomes cannot be considered effective if individualized levels of adherence are not used to justify project planning and evaluation. In medical practice, quantitative assessment of adherence is preferred, suitable for patients with various diseases, and with the possibility of automated data entry and processing. Therefore, sections on medical interventions based on the assessment of treatment adherence should be reflected in national clinical guidelines. These Joint Recommendations are based on these provisions. Β© Group of authors, 202
Treatment management based on adherence: Patient recommendation algorithms. Cross-disciplinary guidelines [Π£ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠ§ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠ‘ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ ΠΠΠΠ ΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π’Π: ΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ’ΠΠ« Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ ΠΠΠ― ΠΠΠ¦ΠΠΠΠ’ΠΠ. ΠΠΠΠΠΠ‘Π¦ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ ΠΠ«Π Π ΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠΠ¦ΠΠ]
The algorithms (sample templates) of recommendations for patients, which are an integral part of adherence-based treatment management technologies, were developed by an interdisciplinary Working Group coordinated by the Treatment Adherence Section of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Physicians. The Working Group includes opinion leaders and experts in the therapeutic, gastroenterology, cardiology, preventive medicine, gerontology, oncology, hematology, immunology, phthisiopulmonology, infectious diseases, oncohematology, neurology, intensive care, rehabilitation and other specialties, both involved by the section of RSMSIM, and recommended by the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, National Association of experts in Thrombosis, Clinical Hemostasiology and Hemorheology, Gerontological Society of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Oncohematologists Society, Russian Society of Phthisiatrists, Society of Evidence-based Neurology. The algorithms are based on the materials of Β«The First Russian Consensus on Quantitative Assessment of adherence to treatmentΒ», approved by the XII National Congress of Internal Medicine (2017) and Clinical Guidelines Β«Treatment Management on the Basis of adherenceΒ», approved by the XIV National Congress of Internal Medicine (2019), taking into account the Consenting Document - Interdisciplinary Guidelines of RSMSIM, GSSR, NATH, SEN, GSRAS, ROHS, RSP Β«Treatment Management on the Basis of AdherenceΒ» (2020). The algorithms of treatment strategies are recommended by the Working Group to be used as a basis for inclusion into relevant sections of clinical guidelines and clinical handbooks developed by professional medical communities, as well as for use by practitioners in medical practice. Β© 2020 Stavropol State Medical University. All rights reserved