9 research outputs found

    ΠœΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠ»ΡΡ†ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° Π² Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ прогрСссировании язвСнного ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π°

    No full text
    In recent decades, an increase in the incidence of ulcerative colitis has been observed throughout the world. The purpose of this review is to generalize the available information on the influence of environmental factors and intestinal microbiome on the occurrence and development of ulcerative colitis, the role of bacteria metabolism products in the pathogenesis of the disease. Studied literature, we came to the conclusion that lifestyle in the era of post-industrial society has a significant impact on the microbial composition of the intestine and leads to changes in its diversity in patients suffering from ulcerative colitis. The changes include a decrease in the number of residential flora with anti-inflammatory activity, which synthesize short-chain fatty acids, and an increase in the number of potentially pathogenic and pathogenic microorganisms. Within the phylums Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, the proportional ratio changes. The combination of aggression factors (deterioration of the intestinal microbiome composition, the presence of aggressive intestinal metabolites) leads to intestinal mucosa permeability disfunction, impairing its barrier function. Food and bacterial agents can penetrate deeper layers of the intestinal wall through mucosal defects, which then stimulate the development of inflammatory and immune responses.ЦСлью ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Π·ΠΎΡ€Π° являСтся ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉΡΡ ΠΈΠ½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎ влиянии Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΎΠΊΡ€ΡƒΠΆΠ°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ срСды ΠΈ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ° ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° Π½Π° Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ язвСнного ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚Π°, Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΡƒΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ° Π±Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π΅Π·Π΅ этого заболСвания. Π˜Π·ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠ² Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ источники, ΠΌΡ‹ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡˆΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊ Π²Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρƒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Π· ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ Π² эпоху ΠΏΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡƒΡΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ общСства ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Ρ‹Π²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ сущСствСнноС влияниС Π½Π° ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ±Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΠΉΠ·Π°ΠΆ ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ измСнСнию Π΅Π³ΠΎ разнообразия Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ…, ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Π΄Π°ΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… язвСнным ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠΌ, Π² частности ΠΊ ΡƒΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ числа Ρ€Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ„Π»ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ с ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ, ΡΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Π΅Π·ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰ΠΈΡ… ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΊΠΎΡ†Π΅ΠΏΠΎΡ‡Π΅Ρ‡Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΆΠΈΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ кислоты, ΠΈ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ числа условно-ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠ². Π’Π½ΡƒΡ‚Ρ€ΠΈ Ρ„ΠΈΠ»ΡƒΠΌΠΎΠ² Firmicutes ΠΈ Proteobacteria измСняСтся ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ€Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΊΡƒΠΏΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² агрСссии (Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ состава ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΈΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ°, наличия агрСссивных ΠΊΠΈΡˆΠ΅Ρ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΠ²) ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡ‚ ΠΊ Π½Π°Ρ€ΡƒΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ проницаСмости слизистой ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ кишки, сниТаСтся Π΅Π΅ Π±Π°Ρ€ΡŒΠ΅Ρ€Π½Π°Ρ функция. Π§Π΅Ρ€Π΅Π· Π΄Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Ρ‹ слизистой ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ‡ΠΊΠΈ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π³Π»ΡƒΠ±ΠΎΠΊΠΈΠ΅ слои стСнки кишки ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΈΡ‰Π΅Π²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ Π±Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅ Π°Π³Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅ΠΌ ΡΡ‚ΠΈΠΌΡƒΠ»ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π°ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈΜ†

    Π“ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ Π»ΠΈ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΠ±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Ρ‹ диагностики ΠΈ лСчСния Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ, ассоциированных с Helicobacter pylori: Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ опроса 2020–2021 Π³ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²

    No full text
    Objective: To assess compliance of physicians with diagnostic and management guidelines for H. pylori-associated diseases with a question-naire-based survey.Materials and methods: We conducted an anonymous voluntary online survey of 775 physicians of the following specialties: internal medicine 459 (59.2%), gastroenterology 279 (36%), and endoscopy 34 (4.4%). The respondents expressed their level of agreement with the questionnaire items as follows: 0 – I do not know, 1 – disagree, 2 – partially agree, and 3 – fully agree.Results: 613 (79.4%) of the physicians fully agreed to diagnose and treat H. pylori in patients with chronic atrophic gastritis, 602 (78.0%) in the 1 st degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, 525 (68.0%) in patients with chronic superficial gastritis, 423 (54.8%) in peptic ulcer at remission, and 336 (43.4%) in those with dyspepsia syndrome. The physicians were equally compliant with eradication therapy in the patients, for whom long term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) or non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is being planned (386 (50.0%) and 397 (51.4%), respectively). Internists were less compliant with diagnosis and management of H. pylori in patients taking both PPI (Ο‡2 = 66.525, p = 0.004) and NSAID (Ο‡2 = 103.354, p = 0.003). Among the primary diagnostic tools for H. pylori the physicians preferred 13/14Π‘-urease breath test (545 physicians, or 70.6%) and gastric bioptate morphology (574, or 74.4%), and among the control diagnostic methods they chose fΠ°eces analyses (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction). The respondents considered bismuth-enhanced standard triple therapy with clarithromycin to be the most effective regimen for the 1 st line eradication therapy (606, 78.5%). To increase the efficacy of eradication therapy, the physicians were more prone to administer esomeprazole or rabeprazole (70.6%), bismuth-based agents (79.4%), than to use rebamipid (35%), probiotics (44.9%) and/or to double PPI doses (44.2%). The respondents expressed their concerns with low patient compliance to treatment (59.4%) and limited diagnostic capabilities (49.4%).Conclusion: Physician's compliance with the guidelines on diagnosis and management of H. pylori-associated diseases is adequate and might depend on both their awareness and availability of the proposed diagnostic and therapeutic methods.ЦСль – ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° комплаСнтности Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π·Π²Π΅Π½Π° Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ выполнСния Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ диагностикС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ Helicobacter pylori-ассоциированных Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π½Π° основании ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ анкСтирования.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π» ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΎ Π°Π½ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ΅ ΠΎΠ½Π»Π°ΠΉΠ½-Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ 775 Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ: 459 (59,2%) Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΏΠ΅Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈ «тСрапия», 279 (36%) – «гастроэнтСрология», 34 (4,4%) – «эндоскопия». Π£Ρ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ согласия рСспондСнты Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈ Π² Π±Π°Π»Π»Π°Ρ…: Β«0Β» – Π½Π΅ знаю, Β«1Β» – Π½Π΅ согласСн, Β«2Β» – согласСн Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΈ Β«3Β» – ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ согласСн.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ΠŸΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ согласными Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ H. pylori Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… хроничСским атрофичСским гастритом Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ 613 (79,4%) Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ, Ρƒ родствСнников 1-ΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ родства Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡƒΠ΄ΠΊΠ° – 602 (78,0%), Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с хроничСским повСрхностным гастритом – 525 (68,0%), Ρƒ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… язвСнной болСзнью Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄ рСмиссии – 423 (54,8%), ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ синдромС диспСпсии – 336 (43,4%). Π’ Ρ€Π°Π²Π½ΠΎΠΉ стСпСни Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΊ эрадикационной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ планируСтся Π΄Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΈΠ±ΠΈΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ‹ (ИПП) ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ нСстСроидных ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (ΠΠŸΠ’ΠŸ) – 386 (50,0%) ΠΈ 397 (51,4%) соотвСтствСнно. Π’Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ΅Π²Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°ΠΆΠ°Π»ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΡƒΡŽ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΊ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΈ диагностикС H. pylori ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ИПП (Ο‡2 = 66,525, p = 0,004), Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΠŸΠ’ΠŸ (Ο‡2 = 103,354, p = 0,003). Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ диагностики H. pylori Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΏΠΎΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ 13/14Π‘-ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π΄Ρ‹Ρ…Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ тСст (545 (70,6%) Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ) ΠΈ морфологичСскоС исслСдованиС гастробиоптата (574 (74,4%)), Π° Π² качСствС ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… – Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ‹ ΠΊΠ°Π»Π° (ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡƒΠ½ΠΎΡ„Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΈ полимСразная цСпная рСакция). НаиболСС эффСктивной схСмой эрадикационной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΈ рСспондСнты считали ΡΡ‚Π°Π½Π΄Π°Ρ€Ρ‚Π½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΡŽ с ΠΊΠ»Π°Ρ€ΠΈΡ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌ, ΡƒΡΠΈΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΡƒΡŽ висмутом (606 (78,5%)). Π’ качСствС способов достиТСния большСй эффСктивности эрадикационной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ Ρ‡Π°Ρ‰Π΅ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π³ΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π² схСмах эрадикации эзомСпразол ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Ρ€Π°Π±Π΅ΠΏΡ€Π°Π·ΠΎΠ» (70,6%), Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€Π΅ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹ висмута (79,4%), Ρ‡Π΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² схСмС эрадикации Ρ€Π΅Π±Π°ΠΌΠΈΠΏΠΈΠ΄ (35%), ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠΈ (44,9%) ΠΈ/ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡƒΠ΄Π²Π°ΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ Π΄ΠΎΠ·Ρƒ ИПП (44,2%). РСспондСнты продСмонстрировали ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Ρ€ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² ΠΊ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ (59,4%) ΠΈ ΠΎΠ³Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒΡŽ диагностичСских возмоТностСй (49,4%).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠšΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ соблюдСния Ρ€Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠΎ диагностикС ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ H. pylori-ассоциированных Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ достаточна ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡ‚ освСдомлСнности Π²Ρ€Π°Ρ‡Π΅ΠΉ, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΎΡ‚ доступности ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅ΠΌΡ‹Ρ… диагностичСских ΠΈ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π±Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²

    The need to strengthen measures for the diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in Russia. Memorandum

    No full text
    Leonid B. Lazebnik, PhD, Doctor of Medical Scienses, Professor, Department of Polyclinic Therapy; President of Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia; Vise President of Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists; Scopus Author ID: 7005446863, ORCID: 0000-0001-8736-5851 Dmitry S. Bordin, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Pancreatic, Biliary and upper digestive tract disorders; professor of the department of general practice (family medicine); professor of the department of propaedeutics of internal diseases and gastroenterology; ORCID: 0000-0003-2815-3992 Nataliya N. Dekhnich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Faculty Therapy; ORCID: 0000-0002-6144-3919 Roman S. Kozlov, Professor, Corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Science, Director, Institution of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy; chief freelance specialist-therapist of the Ministry of Health of Russia for the Siberian Federal District, professor Mariya A. Livzan, D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Rector, Head of the Department of Faculty Therapy, Occupational Diseases; ORCID: 0000-0002-6581-7017, Scopus Author ID: 24341682600 Elena A. Lyalyukova, PhD, MD, Professor of the Department of additional postgraduate education in internal and family medicine, Associate Professor; WoS Research ID: AAB -5416-2021, Scopus Author ID: 56657486600, ORCID: 0000-0003-4878-0838 Svetlana V. Luzina, Deputy Chief physician for Medical Part Galina V. Belova, MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy chief physician; Scopus Author ID: 57198379175 Rustem A. Abdulkhakov, Doctor of Medicine, Professor of the Department of Hospital Therapy, Kazan State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia, Professor; ORCID: 0000-0002-1509-6776, Scopus Author ID: 6506615710 Sayyar R. Abdulkhakov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Fundamental Foundations of Clinical Medicine; Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology; Associate Professor, Department of General Medical Practice and Polyclinic Therapy; assistant professor

    Russian consensus on exo-and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgical treatment

    No full text
    The Russian consensus on exo- and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency after surgical treatment was prepared on the initiative of the Russian Pancreatic Club using the Delphi method. Its goal was to consolidate the opinions of national experts on the most relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment of exo- and endocrine insufficiency after surgical interventions on the pancreas. An interdisciplinary approach is ensured by the participation of leading gastroenterologists and surgeons

    ΠŸΠ•Π Π’Π«Π™ Π ΠžΠ‘Π‘Π˜Π™Π‘ΠšΠ˜Π™ ΠšΠžΠΠ‘Π•ΠΠ‘Π£Π‘ ПО ΠšΠžΠ›Π˜Π§Π•Π‘Π’Π’Π•ΠΠΠžΠ™ ΠžΠ¦Π•ΠΠšΠ• Π Π•Π—Π£Π›Π¬Π’ΠΠ’ΠžΠ’ ΠœΠ•Π”Π˜Π¦Π˜ΠΠ‘ΠšΠ˜Π₯ Π’ΠœΠ•Π¨ΠΠ’Π•Π›Π¬Π‘Π’Π’

    No full text
    The first Russian Consensus on the quantitative evaluation of treatment results was approved by the XIII National Congress of therapists (Moscow, November 21-23, 2018).ΠŸΠ΅Ρ€Π²Ρ‹ΠΉ Российский консСнсус ΠΏΠΎ количСствСнной ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ Ρ€Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² мСдицинских Π²ΠΌΠ΅ΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΡΡ‚Π² ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π΅Π½ XIII ΠΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ конгрСссом Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠ΅Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (Π³. Москва, 21-23 ноября 2018 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π°)

    Management of adherence-based treatment. Consensus document – Clinical guidelines. English version [ΡƒΠΏΠ ΠΠ’Π›Π•ΠΠ˜Π• Π›Π•Π§Π•ΠΠ˜Π•Πœ НА ΠžΠ‘ΠΠžΠ’Π• ΠΏΠ Π˜Π’Π•Π Π–Π•ΠΠΠžΠ‘Π’Π˜. ΠšΠžΠΠ‘Π•ΠΠ‘ΡƒΠ‘ΠΠ«ΠΉ Π”ΠžΠšΡƒΠœΠ•ΠΠ’ – ΠšΠ›Π˜ΠΠ˜Π§Π•Π‘ΠšΠ˜Π• Π Π•ΠšΠžΠœΠ•ΠΠ”ΠΠ¦Π˜Π˜. ΠΠΠ“Π›ΠžΠ―Π·Π«Π§ΠΠΠ― Π’Π•Π Π‘Π˜Π―]

    No full text
    Consensus Document Β«Management of adherence-based treatmentΒ» developed based on clinical guidelines of Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine approved by the XIV National Congress of physicians (Moscow, 20 November 2019). The document is intended primarily to assess adherence to drug therapy, adherence to lifestyle modification, and adherence to medical support for patients who need long-term or permanent treatment. The document’s authors considered the treatment adherence unanimously as the compliance of the patient’s behavior with the recommendations received from the Doctor regarding medication, dieting, and other measures of lifestyle modifications. Insufficient adherence to treatment is a global problem. Assessing adherence as a basis for making medical decisions is an essential element of improving the quality of the healthcare system. Predictions of treatment outcomes cannot be considered effective if individualized levels of adherence are not used to justify project planning and evaluation. In medical practice, quantitative assessment of adherence is preferred, suitable for patients with various diseases, and with the possibility of automated data entry and processing. Therefore, sections on medical interventions based on the assessment of treatment adherence should be reflected in national clinical guidelines. These Joint Recommendations are based on these provisions. Β© Group of authors, 202

    Treatment management based on adherence: Patient recommendation algorithms. Cross-disciplinary guidelines [Π£ΠŸΠ ΠΠ’Π›Π•ΠΠ˜Π• Π›Π•Π§Π•ΠΠ˜Π•Πœ НА ΠžΠ‘ΠΠžΠ’Π• ΠŸΠ Π˜Π’Π•Π Π–Π•ΠΠΠžΠ‘Π’Π˜: ΠΠ›Π“ΠžΠ Π˜Π’ΠœΠ« Π Π•ΠšΠžΠœΠ•ΠΠ”ΠΠ¦Π˜Π™ Π”Π›Π― ΠŸΠΠ¦Π˜Π•ΠΠ’ΠžΠ’. ΠœΠ•Π–Π”Π˜Π‘Π¦Π˜ΠŸΠ›Π˜ΠΠΠ ΠΠ«Π• Π Π•ΠšΠžΠœΠ•ΠΠ”ΠΠ¦Π˜Π˜]

    No full text
    The algorithms (sample templates) of recommendations for patients, which are an integral part of adherence-based treatment management technologies, were developed by an interdisciplinary Working Group coordinated by the Treatment Adherence Section of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Physicians. The Working Group includes opinion leaders and experts in the therapeutic, gastroenterology, cardiology, preventive medicine, gerontology, oncology, hematology, immunology, phthisiopulmonology, infectious diseases, oncohematology, neurology, intensive care, rehabilitation and other specialties, both involved by the section of RSMSIM, and recommended by the Gastroenterological Scientific Society of Russia, National Association of experts in Thrombosis, Clinical Hemostasiology and Hemorheology, Gerontological Society of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Oncohematologists Society, Russian Society of Phthisiatrists, Society of Evidence-based Neurology. The algorithms are based on the materials of Β«The First Russian Consensus on Quantitative Assessment of adherence to treatmentΒ», approved by the XII National Congress of Internal Medicine (2017) and Clinical Guidelines Β«Treatment Management on the Basis of adherenceΒ», approved by the XIV National Congress of Internal Medicine (2019), taking into account the Consenting Document - Interdisciplinary Guidelines of RSMSIM, GSSR, NATH, SEN, GSRAS, ROHS, RSP Β«Treatment Management on the Basis of AdherenceΒ» (2020). The algorithms of treatment strategies are recommended by the Working Group to be used as a basis for inclusion into relevant sections of clinical guidelines and clinical handbooks developed by professional medical communities, as well as for use by practitioners in medical practice. Β© 2020 Stavropol State Medical University. All rights reserved
    corecore