4 research outputs found

    Control of mRNA Splicing by Intragenic RNA Activators of Stress Signaling: Potential Implications for Human Disease

    Get PDF
    A critical step in the cellular stress response is transient activation of the RNA-dependent protein kinase PKR by double-helical RNA, resulting in down-regulation of protein synthesis through phosphorylation of the α chain of translation initiation factor eIF2, a major PKR substrate. However, intragenic elements of 100–200 nucleotides in length within primary transcripts of cellular genes, exemplified by the tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α gene and fetal and adult globin genes, are capable of forming RNA structures that potently activate PKR and thereby strongly enhance mRNA splicing efficiency. By inducing nuclear eIF2α phosphorylation, these PKR activator elements enable highly efficient early spliceosome assembly yet do not impair translation of the mature spliced mRNA. The TNF-α RNA activator of PKR folds into a compact pseudoknot that is highly conserved within the phylogeny. Upon excision of β-globin first intron, the RNA activator of PKR, located in exon 1, is silenced through strand displacement by a short sequence within exon 2, restricting thereby the ability to activate PKR to the splicing process without impeding subsequent synthesis of β-globin essential for survival. This activator/silencer mechanism likewise controls splicing of α-globin pre-mRNA, but the exonic locations of PKR activator and silencer sequences are reversed, demonstrating evolutionary flexibility. Impaired splicing efficiency may underlie numerous human β-thalassemia mutations that map to the β-globin RNA activator of PKR or its silencer. Even where such mutations change the encoded amino acid sequence during subsequent translation, they carry the potential of first impairing PKR-dependent mRNA splicing or shutoff of PKR activation needed for optimal translation

    An Ancient Pseudoknot in TNF-α Pre-mRNA Activates PKR, Inducing eIF2α Phosphorylation that Potently Enhances Splicing

    No full text
    Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is expressed promptly during inflammatory responses. Efficient TNF-α mRNA splicing is achieved through a 3′ UTR element that activates RNA-dependent eIF2α protein kinase (PKR). The TNF-α RNA activator, we show, folds into a pseudoknot conserved from teleost fish to humans, critical for PKR activation and mRNA splicing. The pseudoknot constrains the RNA into two double-helical stacks having parallel axes, permitting facile PKR dimerization and trans-autophosphorylation needed for kinase activation. Mutations show that the PKR activator potently enhances splicing without inhibiting translation. eIF2α phosphorylation represses translation and is essential for coping with cellular stress, yet PKR-enabled TNF mRNA splicing depends strictly on eIF2α phosphorylation. Indeed, eIF2α phosphorylation at Serine51 is necessary and sufficient to achieve highly efficient splicing, extending its role from negative control of translation to positive control of splicing. This mechanism, operational in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), links stress signaling to protective immunity through TNF mRNA splicing rendered efficient upon eIF2α phosphorylation

    HIV co-opts a cellular antiviral mechanism, activation of stress kinase PKR by its RNA, to enable splicing of rev/tat mRNA

    No full text
    Background: Activation of RNA-dependent stress kinase PKR, especially by viral double-stranded RNA, induces eukaryotic initiation factor 2 α-chain (eIF2α) phosphorylation, attenuating thereby translation. We report that this RNA-mediated negative control mechanism, considered a cornerstone of the cell’s antiviral response, positively regulates splicing of a viral mRNA. Results: Excision of the large human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) rev/tat intron depends strictly on activation of PKR by the viral RNA and on eIF2α phosphorylation. Rev/tat mRNA splicing was blocked by viral PKR antagonists Vaccinia E3L and Ebola VP35, as well as by a trans-dominant negative mutant of PKR, yet enhanced by overexpressing PKR. Expression of non-phosphorylatable mutant eIF2αS51A, but not of wild type eIF2α, abrogated efficient splicing of rev/tat mRNA. By contrast, expression of eIF2αS51D, a phosphomimetic mutant of eIF2α, left rev/tat mRNA splicing intact. Unlike eIF2αS51A, eIF2αS51D does not inhibit eIF2α phosphorylation by activated PKR. All HIV mRNA species contain terminal trans-activation response (TAR) stem-loop sequences that potentially could activate PKR, yet even upon TAR deletion, HIV mRNA production remained sensitive to inhibitors of PKR activation. Bioinformatic and mutational analyses revealed a compact RNA pseudoknot upstream of 3′-terminal TAR that promotes splicing by activating PKR. Supporting its essential role in control of splicing, this pseudoknot is conserved among diverse HIV and nonhuman primate SIVcpz isolates. The pseudoknot and 3′-terminal TAR collaborate in mediating PKR-regulated splicing of rev/tat intron, the pseudoknot being dominant. Conclusions: Our results on HIV provide the first example of a virus co-opting activation of PKR by its RNA, a cellular antiviral mechanism, to promote splicing. They raise the question whether other viruses may use local activation of host kinase PKR through RNA elements within their genome to achieve efficient splicing of their mRNA. Our experiments reveal an indispensable role for eIF2α phosphorylation in HIV rev/tat mRNA splicing that accounts for the need for PKR activation
    corecore