Association of Gangrenous, Suppurative, and Exudative Findings With Outcomes and Resource Utilization in Children With Nonperforated Appendicitis.

IMPORTANCE: The clinical significance of gangrenous, suppurative, or exudative (GSE) findings is poorly characterized in children with nonperforated appendicitis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether GSE findings in children with nonperforated appendicitis are associated with increased risk of surgical site infections and resource utilization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multicenter cohort study used data from the Appendectomy Targeted Database of the American College of Surgeons Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, which were augmented with operative report data obtained by supplemental medical record review. Data were obtained from 15 hospitals participating in the Eastern Pediatric Surgery Network (EPSN) research consortium. The study cohort comprised children (aged ≤18 years) with nonperforated appendicitis who underwent appendectomy from July 1, 2015, to June 30, 2020. EXPOSURES: The presence of GSE findings was established through standardized, keyword-based audits of operative reports by EPSN surgeons. Interrater agreement for the presence or absence of GSE findings was evaluated in a random sample of 900 operative reports. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative surgical site infections (incisional and organ space infections). Secondary outcomes included rates of hospital revisits, postoperative abdominal imaging, and postoperative length of stay. Multivariable mixed-effects regression was used to adjust measures of association for patient characteristics and clustering within hospitals. RESULTS: Among 6133 children with nonperforated appendicitis, 867 (14.1%) had GSE findings identified from operative report review (hospital range, 4.2%-30.2%; P \u3c .001). Reviewers agreed on presence or absence of GSE findings in 93.3% of cases (weighted κ, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92). In multivariable analysis, GSE findings were associated with increased odds of any surgical site infection (4.3% vs 2.2%; odds ratio [OR], 1.91; 95% CI, 1.35-2.71; P \u3c .001), organ space infection (2.8% vs 1.1%; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.30-3.67; P = .003), postoperative imaging (5.8% vs 3.7%; OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.23-2.36; P = .002), and prolonged mean postoperative length of stay (1.6 vs 0.9 days; rate ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.32-1.54; P \u3c .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In children with nonperforated appendicitis, findings of gangrene, suppuration, or exudate are associated with increased surgical site infections and resource utilization. Further investigation is needed to establish the role and duration of postoperative antibiotics and inpatient management to optimize outcomes in this cohort of children

Management of Pediatric Appendicitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted timely access to care for children, including patients with appendicitis. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on management of appendicitis and patient outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study was performed including 19 children\u27s hospitals from April 2019-October 2020 of children (age≤18 years) diagnosed with appendicitis. Groups were defined by each hospital\u27s city/state stay-at-home orders (SAHO), designating patients as Pre-COVID (Pre-SAHO) or COVID (Post-SAHO). Demographic, treatment, and outcome data were obtained, and univariate and multivariable analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 6,014 patients, 2,413 (40.1%) presented during the COVID-19 pandemic. More patients were managed non-operatively during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to before the pandemic (147 (6.1%) vs 144 (4.0%), p \u3c 0.001). Despite this change, there was no difference in the proportion of complicated appendicitis between groups (1,247 (34.6%) vs 849 (35.2%), p = 0.12). COVID era non-operative patients received fewer additional procedures, including interventional radiology (IR) drain placements, compared to pre-COVID non-operative patients (29 (19.7%) vs 69 (47.9%), p \u3c 0.001). On adjusted analysis, factors associated with increased odds of receiving non-operative management included: increasing duration of symptoms (OR=1.01, 95% CI: 1.01-1.012), African American race (OR=2.4, 95% CI: 1.3-4.6), and testing positive for COVID-19 (OR=10.8, 95% CI: 5.4-21.6). CONCLUSION: Non-operative management of appendicitis increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, fewer COVID era cases required IR procedures. These changes in the management of pediatric appendicitis during the COVID pandemic demonstrates the potential for future utilization of non-operative management

Management of pilonidal disease

© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Purpose of review Pilonidal disease, and the treatment associated with it, can cause significant morbidity and substantial burden to patients\u27 quality of life. Despite the plethora of surgical techniques that have been developed to treat pilonidal disease, discrepancies in technique, recurrence rates, complications, time to return to work/school and patients\u27 aesthetic satisfaction between treatment options have led to controversy over the best approach to this common acquired disease of young adults. Recent findings The management of pilonidal disease must strike a balance between recurrence and surgical morbidity. The commonly performed wide excision without closure has prolonged recovery, while flap closures speed recovery time and improve aesthetics at the expense of increased wound complications. Less invasive surgical techniques have recently evolved and are straightforward, with minimal morbidity and satisfactory results. Summary As with any surgical intervention, the ideal treatment for pilonidal disease would be simple and cost-effective, cause minimal pain, have a limited hospital stay, low recurrence rate and require minimal time off from school or work. Less invasive procedures for pilonidal disease may be favourable as an initial approach for these patients reserving complex surgical treatment for refractory disease

Early Experience with Variant Two-Stage Approach in Surgical Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Colitis in the Pediatric Population.

Introduction: Multistaged surgical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), culminating in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), can provide cure for refractory IBD symptoms while maintaining fecal continence. Surgical approaches to IPAA historically included a three-stage approach done by subtotal colectomy (STC) followed by IPAA with diversion. Recently, a variant two-stage approach without diversion at IPAA has become increasingly utilized, yet evidence of the efficacy of this approach is limited. Methods: Retrospective review of patients aged 5-21 years who underwent initial STC, followed by a total proctocolectomy with IPAA +/- diversion for medically refractory IBD from January 2010 to August 2018 (n = 25). Results: Majority of IPAA procedures were done laparoscopically (88.5%). Thirteen patients (52%) underwent two-stage variant IPAA. There were no differences in readmission rates (66.7% versus 53.8%, P = .5) or reoperation rates (50% versus 30.8%, P = .3) between groups. Forty percent of patients experienced a complication after IPAA. Complication rates were similar between two-stage and three-stage IPAA groups (38.5% versus 50%, P = .33). Complications within the two-stage group included anastomotic leak, pouchitis, wound infection, anastomotic stricture, and incarcerated hernia. Complications within the three-stage group included bloody ostomy output, dehydration, anastomotic stricture, small bowel obstruction, and pouch volvulus. Conclusions: Treatment of refractory IBD in children remains challenging, but STC followed by IPAA is an approach that provides symptom relief and preserves continence. Complication rates remained unchanged regardless of whether IPAA was conducted with or without diversion, demonstrating that the two-stage variant approach is a safe and feasible treatment that may reduce subsequent anesthesia exposure and trips to the operating room

Ultrasound-guided bilateral rectus sheath block vs. conventional local analgesia in single port laparoscopic appendectomy for children with nonperforated appendicitis

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Introduction: Despite its minimally invasive approach, laparoscopic surgery can cause considerable pain. Regional analgesic techniques such as the rectus sheath block (RSB) offer improved pain management following elective umbilical hernia repair in the pediatric population. This effect has not been examined in laparoscopic single-incision surgery in children. We sought to compare the efficacy of bilateral ultrasound-guided RSB versus local anesthetic infiltration (LAI) in providing postoperative pain relief in pediatric single-incision transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy (TULA) with same-day discharge. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 275 children, ages 4 to 17 years old, who underwent TULA for uncomplicated appendicitis in a single institution from August 2014 to July 2015. We compared those that received preincision bilateral RSB (n = 136) with those who received LAI (n = 139). The primary outcome was narcotic administration. Secondary outcomes included initial and mean scores, time from anesthesia induction to release, operative time, time to rescue dose of analgesic in the PACU and time to PACU discharge. Results: Total narcotic administration was significantly reduced in patients that underwent preincision RSB compared to those that received conventional LAI, with a mean of 0.112 mg/kg of morphine versus 0.290 mg/kg morphine (p \u3c 0.0001). Patients undergoing RSB reported lower initial (0.38 vs. 2.38; p \u3c 0.0001) and mean pain scores (1.26 vs. 1.77; p \u3c 0.015). Time to rescue analgesia was prolonged in patients undergoing RSB compared to LAI (58.93 min vs. 41.56 min; p = 0.047). Conclusion: Preincision RSB for TULA in uncomplicated appendicitis in children is associated with decreased opioid consumption and lower pain scores compared with LAI. As the addition of this procedure only added 6.67 min to time under anesthesia, we feel that it is a viable option for postoperative pain control in pediatric single-incision laparoscopic surgery. Retrospective comparative study: LEVEL III EVIDENCE