14 research outputs found

    Occurrence of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Young Pregnant Women

    No full text
    Although acute leukaemia is rare in pregnancy its importance lies in its life-threatening potential, both to the child and the mother. The possibility of vertical transmission of leukemic cells increases the attention devoted to these patients and their offspring. Three cases of pregnant young women (15-17 years of age) with AML are presented. This series of cases is the first report where gene abnormalities such as ITD mutations of the FLT3 gene and AML1/ETO fusion genes were screened in pregnant AML patients and their babies, so far. Unfortunately, very poor outcomes have been associated to similar cases described in literature, and the same was true to the patients described herein. Although very speculative, we think that the timing and possible similar exposures would be involved in all cases

    Identification of differential regulation of European versus African local ancestry haplotypes surrounding ApoEε4

    No full text
    Background The risk for late‐onset Alzheimer disease (AD) in ApoEε4 carriers differs between ancestral groups. ApoEε4 Non‐Hispanic White (NHW) homozygotes have an odds ratio of 14.9 while the risk is much lower in Africans (AF) (OR 2.2‐5.7). Local ancestry (LA) analyses in ApoEε4 carrier populations have shown the protective effect in Africans relative to NHW is due to factors lying in the LA surrounding ApoEε4. No coding differences between genes in the LA have been observed between AF and NHW ancestries. Thus regulatory differences in LA non‐coding regions are most likely involved in the protective factor(s) lowering the risk for AF carriers of ApoEε4. Enhancers are the most common regulatory element, and thus we sought to identify if any of these variants had functional enhancer effects between the two ancestries. Little functional characterization of genetic regulation in AF ancestries has been investigated. Method We identified 56 significant sequence differences among AF and ApoEε4 haplotypes from the 1000 genomes in a topologically associated area (56kb) surrounding ApoE. None of these differences were identified to be protein coding. We applied Massively Parallel Reporter Assay (MPRA) supplemented with single variant reporter assays using Promega Dual Glo‐Luciferase System in AD relevant cell lines to identify the regulatory potential of these variants and their surrounding regions and to assess the differential effect sizes of the variant alleles on enhancer activity. Result For MPRA and complementary single variants reporter assays, we generated ∼900bp PCR fragments surrounding these variants to ensure full representation of potential regulatory elements. MPRA vector library or single reporter vectors were transfected in three cell lines (SHY‐SY5Y neuronal cells, U‐118 astrocytes and HMC3 microglia). We identified evidence for differential regulation between AF and EU variant haplotypes in intron 5 of PVRL2, TOMM40 intronic regions and a large region located 3’ of APOC1. The latter encompasses a putative enhancer identified through ENCODE analyses in brains with NHW ancestry. Conclusion Our results indicate several areas of differential regulation in this LA region on ApoEε4 haplotypes. Follow‐up of the identified regulatory regions is currently ongoing using publicly available data and in‐house iPSC derived cell lines

    Clinical significance of filamin A in patients with acromegaly and its association with somatostatin and dopamine receptor profiles

    No full text
    Abstract Filamin-A (FLNA) plays a crucial role in somatostatin receptor (sst) subtype-2 signaling in somatotropinomas. Our objective was to investigate the in vivo association between FLNA and sst2 expression, sst5 expression, dopamine receptor subtype-2 (D2) expression, somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL) responsiveness and tumor invasiveness in somatotropinomas. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to evaluate the absolute mRNA copy numbers of FLNA/sst2/sst5/D2 in 96 somatotropinomas. FLNA, sst2 and sst5 protein expression levels were also evaluated using immunohistochemistry. The Knosp-Steiner criteria were used to evaluate tumor invasiveness. Median FLNA, sst2, sst5 and D2 copy numbers were 4,244, 731, 156 and 3,989, respectively. Thirty-one of the 35 available tumors (89%) were immune positive for FLNA in the cytoplasm and membrane but not in the nucleus. FLNA and sst5 expression were positively correlated at the mRNA and protein levels (p < 0.001 and p = 0.033, respectively). FLNA was positively correlated with sst2 mRNA in patients who were responsive to SRL (p = 0.014, R = 0.659). No association was found between FLNA and tumor invasiveness. Our findings show that in somatotropinomas FLNA expression positively correlated with in vivo sst5 and D2 expression. Notably, FLNA was only correlated with sst2 in patients who were controlled with SRL. FLNA was not associated with tumor invasiveness
    corecore