How similar are the different results?

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43555/1/11135_2004_Article_BF00145805.pd

A Precious Bequest: Contemporary Research with the WPA-CCC Collections from Moundville, Alabama *

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/72459/1/j.1749-6632.1981.tb28184.x.pd

The prediction of preference for unfamiliar urban places

Preferences for unfamiliar urban environments were studied as a function of urban categories, viewing time, and four predictor variables: complexity, coherence, identifiability, and mystery. A nonmetric factor analysis of the preference ratings for the longest viewing-time condition yielded five dimensions: Contemporary Life, Alley/Factory, Urban Nature, Unusual Architecture, and Older Buildings. The five categories differed significantly in preference, with Urban Nature by far the most preferred and Alley/Factory distinctly disliked. The combination of low coherence and high complexity characterizes the least liked Alley/Factory category, while the role of mystery in the urban setting is highlighted by the most preferred Urban Nature category. The results point to various ways in which the urban environment could be more responsive to people's preferences.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/43513/1/11111_2005_Article_BF01359051.pd

Reciprocal Interaction and Similarity of Personality Attributes

In a study of the relationship between similarity of personality and interaction choices, 336 students gave up to ten choices within fifty person classes. Personality variables were measured two years before sociometric choices (before acquaintance) and at the time of the choices. Reciprocal interaction pairs were more similar on a derived authoritarianism scale of the Omnibus Personality Inventory (OPI) than no-choice pairs at the time of the choices, but not more similar before they became acquainted. Religious items accounted for the increased similarity. A Guttman scale of religious items was identified and scores were related to sociometric spaces generated with Guttman-Lingoes smallest space analysis. Church affiliation did not explain reciprocal interaction choices, but church attendance was weakly related to choices, with reciprocal pairs being more similar than no-choice pairs on frequency of attendance. Reciprocal interaction pairs which persisted to the fourth year were more similar on intellectualism than persistent nochoice pairs and more similar than reciprocal interaction pairs which did not persist. These findings suggest that similarity leads to interaction and that interaction leads to increased similarity.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/68628/2/10.1177_0265407584014002.pd