7 research outputs found

    MODULATION OF AUTOPHAGY AND SENESCENCE TO ENHANCE THE RESPONSE TO THERAPY IN TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER

    Get PDF
    Abstract Although great strides have been made over the decades in development and optimization of anti-cancer therapies, even highly effective drugs often fail to completely eliminate tumors. Residual tumor cells can enter into a state of dormancy for prolonged periods of time but eventually are able to regain proliferative capacity and reemerge as chemotherapy-resistant disease. Because recurrent disease is a leading contributor to patient’s mortality, it is paramount to identify strategies for effectively destroying residual tumor cells. Cytotoxic drugs and ionizing radiation are used as standard therapies in a variety of cancers. These modalities induce apoptosis, autophagy and senescence. Senescence is a state of prolonged growth arrest, which cells are able to eventually escape regaining proliferative capacity. Autophagy is generally considered to be a protective mechanism; however, it can take non-protective or even cytotoxic form in response to anti-cancer treatments. Furthermore, chemotherapy or radiation induced autophagy was shown to be a contributor to the immune response against tumor cells. Using a model of Triple Negative Breast Cancer, we were able to show increased immunosurveillance of tumor cells after enhanced autophagy was achieved by combining epigenetic remodeling with chemotherapy. Alternatively, we were able to achieved effective clearance of tumor cells induced into senescence by chemotherapy or radiation by the senolytic drug ABT-263 (Navitoclax). In summary, autophagy and senescence alone or in concert, can be induced by conventional anti-tumor modalities. Those processes can be modulated independently to achieve clearance of residual tumor cells following anti-cancer therapies

    The BET inhibitor/degrader ARV-825 prolongs the growth arrest response to Fulvestrant + Palbociclib and suppresses proliferative recovery in ER-positive breast cancer

    Get PDF
    Anti-estrogens or aromatase inhibitors in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors are the current standard of care for estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) Her-2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Although these combination therapies prolong progression-free survival compared to endocrine therapy alone, the growth-arrested state of residual tumor cells is clearly transient. Tumor cells that escape what might be considered a dormant or quiescent state and regain proliferative capacity often acquire resistance to further therapies. Our studies are based upon the observation that breast tumor cells arrested by Fulvestrant + Palbociclib enter into states of both autophagy and senescence from which a subpopulation ultimately escapes, potentially contributing to recurrent disease. Autophagy inhibition utilizing pharmacologic or genetic approaches only moderately enhanced the response to Fulvestrant + Palbociclib in ER+ MCF-7 breast tumor cells, slightly delaying proliferative recovery. In contrast, the BET inhibitor/degrader, ARV-825, prolonged the growth arrested state in both p53 wild type MCF-7 cells and p53 mutant T-47D cells and significantly delayed proliferative recovery. In addition, ARV-825 added after the Fulvestrant + Palbociclib combination promoted apoptosis and demonstrated efficacy in resistant RB deficient cell lines. These studies indicate that administration of BET inhibitors/degraders, which are currently being investigated in multiple clinical trials, may potentially improve standard of care therapy in metastatic ER+ breast cancer patients and may further prolong progression-free survival

    Studies of Non-Protective Autophagy Provide Evidence that Recovery from Therapy-Induced Senescence is Independent of Early Autophagy

    Full text link
    Autophagy and senescence, predominant responses that may dictate cell fate after chemotherapy or radiation, often occur in tandem. Cells in states of senescence and/or autophagy are frequently growth arrested. We have previously reported that tumor cells induced into senescence by therapy can re-emerge from the growth-arrested state, a phenomenon termed proliferative recovery. The current work shows that, while tumor cells collaterally induced into senescence and autophagy by etoposide, doxorubicin, or radiation undergo proliferative recovery, neither pharmacological nor genetic inhibition of early autophagy alter the extent of senescence or the ability of cells to recover from senescence. These findings confirm and extend our previous observations, essentially dissociating senescence from autophagy, and further indicate that re-emergence from senescence does not appear to be facilitated by or dependent on autophagy. Our results also provide additional evidence for the promotion of the non-protective form of autophagy by both chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation, which may complicate current efforts to inhibit autophagy for therapeutic benefit

    Clearance of therapy‐induced senescent tumor cells by the senolytic ABT‐263 via interference with BCL‐XL–BAX interaction

    Full text link
    Tumor cells undergo senescence in response to both conventional and targeted cancer therapies. The induction of senescence in response to cancer therapy can contribute to unfavorable patient outcomes, potentially including disease relapse. This possibiliy is supported by our findings that tumor cells induced into senescence by doxorubicin or etoposide can give rise to viable tumors in vivo. We further demonstrate sensitivity of these senescent tumor cells to the senolytic ABT‐263 (navitoclax), therefore providing a “two‐hit” approach to eliminate senescent tumor cells that persist after exposure to chemotherapy or radiation. The sequential combination of therapy‐induced senescence and ABT‐263 could shift the response to therapy toward apoptosis by interfering with the interaction between BCL‐XL and BAX. The administration of ABT‐263 after either etoposide or doxorubicin also resulted in marked, prolonged tumor suppression in tumor‐bearing animals. These findings support the premise that senolytic therapy following conventional cancer therapy may improve therapeutic outcomes and delay disease recurrence

    Clearance of therapy‐induced senescent tumor cells by the senolytic ABT‐263 via interference with BCL‐X L

    Full text link
    Tumor cells undergo senescence in response to both conventional and targeted cancer therapies. The induction of senescence in response to cancer therapy can contribute to unfavorable patient outcomes, potentially including disease relapse. This possibiliy is supported by our findings that tumor cells induced into senescence by doxorubicin or etoposide can give rise to viable tumors in vivo. We further demonstrate sensitivity of these senescent tumor cells to the senolytic ABT‐263 (navitoclax), therefore providing a “two‐hit” approach to eliminate senescent tumor cells that persist after exposure to chemotherapy or radiation. The sequential combination of therapy‐induced senescence and ABT‐263 could shift the response to therapy toward apoptosis by interfering with the interaction between BCL‐XL and BAX. The administration of ABT‐263 after either etoposide or doxorubicin also resulted in marked, prolonged tumor suppression in tumor‐bearing animals. These findings support the premise that senolytic therapy following conventional cancer therapy may improve therapeutic outcomes and delay disease recurrence

    Tumor cell escape from therapy-induced senescence.

    Full text link
    H460 non-small cell lung, HCT116 colon and 4T1 breast tumor cell lines induced into senescence by exposure to either etoposide or doxorubicin were able to recover proliferative capacity both in mass culture and when enriched for the senescence-like phenotype by flow cytometry (based on ÎČ-galactosidase staining and cell size, and a senescence-associated reporter, BTG1-RFP). Recovery was further established using both real-time microscopy and High-Speed Live-Cell Interferometry (HSLCI) and was shown to be accompanied by the attenuation of the Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype (SASP). Cells enriched for the senescence-like phenotype were also capable of forming tumors when implanted in both immunodeficient and immunocompetent mice. As chemotherapy-induced senescence has been identified in patient tumors, our results suggest that certain senescence-like phenotypes may not reflect a terminal state of growth arrest, as cells that recover with self-renewal capacity may ultimately contribute to disease recurrence

    A novel retinoic acid receptor-Îł agonist antagonizes immune checkpoint resistance in lung cancers by altering the tumor immune microenvironment

    Full text link
    Abstract All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) agonist, regulates cell growth, differentiation, immunity, and survival. We report that ATRA-treatment repressed cancer growth in syngeneic immunocompetent, but not immunodeficient mice. The tumor microenvironment was implicated: CD8+ T cell depletion antagonized ATRA’s anti-tumorigenic effects in syngeneic mice. ATRA-treatment with checkpoint blockade did not cooperatively inhibit murine lung cancer growth. To augment ATRA’s anti-tumorigenicity without promoting its pro-tumorigenic potential, an RARÎł agonist (IRX4647) was used since it regulates T cell biology. Treating with IRX4647 in combination with an immune checkpoint (anti-PD-L1) inhibitor resulted in a statistically significant suppression of syngeneic 344SQ lung cancers in mice—a model known for its resistance to checkpoints and characterized by low basal T cell and PD-L1 expression. This combined treatment notably elevated CD4+ T-cell presence within the tumor microenvironment and increased IL-5 and IL-13 tumor levels, while simultaneously decreasing CD38 in the tumor stroma. IL-5 and/or IL-13 treatments increased CD4+ more than CD8+ T-cells in mice. IRX4647-treatment did not appreciably affect in vitro lung cancer growth, despite RARÎł expression. Pharmacokinetic analysis found IRX4647 plasma half-life was 6 h in mice. Yet, RARα antagonist (IRX6696)-treatment with anti-PD-L1 did not repress syngeneic lung cancer growth. Together, these findings provide a rationale for a clinical trial investigating an RARÎł agonist to augment check point blockade response in cancers
    corecore