9 research outputs found
School Choice Litigation After Zelman and Locke
In the past 2 years, the United States Supreme Court has decided two important cases that will bear directly on legislation and litigation involving school choice programs that provide financial aid to parents of children attending religious schools. Those cases are Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) and Locke v. Davey (2004). The reasoning in Zelman, along with the litigation in the lower courts leading up to that decision, provide useful insights that should prove helpful in drafting school choice legislation and successfully defending it in court when challenged. The decision in Locke may have implications for litigation involving challenges to state laws and constitutional provisions limiting aid to religious institutions and to students attending religious schools. Both cases are discussed below
School Choice Litigation After Zelman and Locke
In the past 2 years, the United States Supreme Court has decided two important cases that will bear directly on legislation and litigation involving school choice programs that provide financial aid to parents of children attending religious schools. Those cases are Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) and Locke v. Davey (2004). The reasoning in Zelman, along with the litigation in the lower courts leading up to that decision, provide useful insights that should prove helpful in drafting school choice legislation and successfully defending it in court when challenged. The decision in Locke may have implications for litigation involving challenges to state laws and constitutional provisions limiting aid to religious institutions and to students attending religious schools. Both cases are discussed below
El Correo de Cantabria : peri贸dico de noticias, literario y de anuncios: A帽o XIII N煤mero 64 - 1894 mayo 30
Copia digital. Madrid : Ministerio de Educaci贸n, Cultura y Deporte. Subdirecci贸n General de Coordinaci贸n Bibliotecaria, 201
In Good Faith: A Dialogue on Funding Faith-Based Social Services
Presents various points of view by religious and civic organizations regarding cooperative efforts between U.S. government and faith-based groups to provide social services