Anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 induced acute myocarditis—A case report

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first published report of anti-immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 (ILT3)-induced myocarditis. A 48-year old female patient with refractory acute myeloid leukemia who was given a single dose of anti-ILT3 monotherapy presented with fever, hypotension, chest pain, and elevated cardiac biomarkers. Systolic bi-ventricular function was in normal limits. The patient was promptly treated with pulse dose steroids with a rapid hemodynamic and clinical improvement and declining levels of cardiac biomarkers. The diagnosis of acute myocarditis was confirmed using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging applying the revised Lake Lewis criteria. While larger-scale data are needed in order to assess the incidence, management and prognosis of anti-ILT-3 induced myocarditis, we believe a high level of suspicion for adverse non-target cardiac effects is required in patients receiving this novel class of drugs

Infection prevention practices among EBMT hematopoietic cell transplant centers: the EBMT Infectious Disease Working Party survey

We aimed to describe the current status of infection prevention practices among EBMT centers. Questionnaires were distributed to all 553 EBMT transplant centers to capture clinical practices regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis, protective measures, isolation procedures and growth-factor support of patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Responses from 127 centers in 32 countries were obtained. Most centers housed patients in single rooms (autologous-82%; allogeneic-98%), with high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filters (autologous-73%; allogeneic-100%) and positive pressure (autologous-61%; allogeneic-88%). Pre-engraftment G-CSF was utilized by 77 and 31% of centers after autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively (P < 0.00001). Antibacterial prophylaxis was provided by 57 and 69% (P = 0.086) of centers and antifungal prophylaxis by 65 and 84% (P = 0.0008) of centers, to patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively. Yet, 16 and 3% of centers provided neither antibacterial nor antifungal prophylaxis to patients undergoing autologous and allogeneic transplantation, respectively. Considerable variation existed between centers and across countries in antimicrobial prophylaxis practices, medications employed and duration of preventive therapy. There were considerable discordances between guidelines and daily practices. JACIE accredited and non-accredited centers did not differ significantly in their antimicrobial prophylaxis practices. Whether these differences between transplant centers translated into differences in infectious morbidity, mortality and financial costs, warrants further research