2,534 research outputs found

    Isospin violation in Ο•,J/ψ,Οˆβ€²β†’Ο‰Ο€0\phi, J/\psi, \psi^\prime \to \omega \pi^0 via hadronic loops

    Full text link
    In this work, we study the isospin-violating decay of ϕ→ωπ0\phi\to \omega\pi^0 and quantify the electromagnetic (EM) transitions and intermediate meson exchanges as two major sources of the decay mechanisms. In the EM decays, the present datum status allows a good constraint on the EM decay form factor in the vector meson dominance (VMD) model, and it turns out that the EM transition can only account for about 1/4∼1/31/4\sim 1/3 of the branching ratio for ϕ→ωπ0\phi\to \omega\pi^0. The intermediate meson exchanges, KKΛ‰(Kβˆ—)K\bar{K}(K^*) (intermediate KKΛ‰K\bar{K} interaction via Kβˆ—K^* exchanges), KKβˆ—Λ‰(K)K\bar{K^*}(K) (intermediate KKβˆ—Λ‰K\bar{K^*} rescattering via kaon exchanges), and KKβˆ—Λ‰(Kβˆ—)K\bar{K^*}(K^*) (intermediate KKβˆ—Λ‰K\bar{K^*} rescattering via Kβˆ—K^* exchanges), which evade the naive Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka (OZI) rule, serve as another important contribution to the isospin violations. They are evaluated with effective Lagrangians where explicit constraints from experiment can be applied. Combining these three contributions, we obtain results in good agreement with the experimental data. This approach is also extended to J/ψ(Οˆβ€²)→ωπ0J/\psi(\psi^\prime)\to \omega\pi^0, where we find contributions from the KKΛ‰(Kβˆ—)K\bar{K}(K^*), KKβˆ—Λ‰(K)K\bar{K^*}(K) and KKβˆ—Λ‰(Kβˆ—)K\bar{K^*}(K^*) loops are negligibly small, and the isospin violation is likely to be dominated by the EM transition.Comment: Revised version resubmitted to PRD; Additional loop contributions included; Conclusion unchange

    On Exact Bayesian Credible Sets for Classification and Pattern Recognition

    Full text link
    The current definition of a Bayesian credible set cannot, in general, achieve an arbitrarily preassigned credible level. This drawback is particularly acute for classification problems, where there are only a finite number of achievable credible levels. As a result, there is as of today no general way to construct an exact credible set for classification. In this paper, we introduce a generalized credible set that can achieve any preassigned credible level. The key insight is a simple connection between the Bayesian highest posterior density credible set and the Neyman--Pearson lemma, which, as far as we know, hasn't been noticed before. Using this connection, we introduce a randomized decision rule to fill the gaps among the discrete credible levels. Accompanying this methodology, we also develop the Steering Wheel Plot to represent the credible set, which is useful in visualizing the uncertainty in classification. By developing the exact credible set for discrete parameters, we make the theory of Bayesian inference more complete.Comment: 16 pages, 6 figure

    The meson-exchange model for the ΛΛˉ\Lambda\bar{\Lambda} interaction

    Full text link
    In the present work, we apply the one-boson-exchange potential (OBEP) model to investigate the possibility of Y(2175) and Ξ·(2225)\eta(2225) as bound states of ΛΛˉ(3S1)\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}(^3S_1) and ΛΛˉ(1S0)\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}(^1S_0) respectively. We consider the effective potential from the pseudoscalar Ξ·\eta-exchange and Ξ·β€²\eta^{'}-exchange, the scalar Οƒ\sigma-exchange, and the vector Ο‰\omega-exchange and Ο•\phi-exchange. The Ξ·\eta and Ξ·β€²\eta^{'} meson exchange potential is repulsive force for the state 1S0^1S_0 and attractive for 3S1^3S_1. The results depend very sensitively on the cutoff parameter of the Ο‰\omega-exchange (Λω\Lambda_{\omega}) and least sensitively on that of the Ο•\phi-exchange (Λϕ\Lambda_{\phi}). Our result suggests the possible interpretation of Y(2175) and Ξ·(2225)\eta(2225) as the bound states of ΛΛˉ(3S1)\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}(^3S_1) and ΛΛˉ(1S0)\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}(^1S_0) respectively
    • …
    corecore