636 research outputs found

    Branching Ratios, Forward-backward Asymmetry and Angular Distributions of Bβ†’K1l+lβˆ’B\to K_1l^+l^- Decays

    Full text link
    Using the Bβ†’K1B\to K_1 form factors evaluated in the perturbative QCD approach, we study semileptonic Bβ†’K1(1270)l+lβˆ’B\to K_1(1270)l^+l^- and Bβ†’K1(1400)l+lβˆ’B\to K_1(1400)l^+l^- decays, where K1(1270)K_1(1270) and K1(1400)K_1(1400) are mixtures of K1AK_{1A} and K1BK_{1B} which are 3P1^3P_1 and 1P1^1P_1 states, respectively. Using the technique of helicity amplitudes, we express the decay amplitudes in terms of several independent and Lorentz invariant pieces. We study the dilepton invariant mass distributions, branching ratios, polarizations and forward-backward asymmetries of Bβ†’K1l+lβˆ’ B\to K_1l^+l^- decays. The ambiguity in the sign of the mixing angle will induce much large differences to branching ratios of semileptonic B decays: branching ratios without resonant contributions either have the order of 10βˆ’610^{-6} or 10βˆ’810^{-8}. But the polarizations and the forward-backward asymmetries are not sensitive to the mixing angles. We find that the resonant contributions will dramatically change the dilepton invariant mass distributions in the resonant region. We also provide the angular distributions of Bβ†’K1l+lβˆ’β†’(Kππ)l+lβˆ’ B\to K_1l^+l^-\to (K\pi\pi)l^+l^- decays.Comment: 14 pages, 6 figures, version appears in PR

    B→SB\to S Transition Form Factors in the PQCD approach

    Full text link
    Under two different scenarios for the light scalar mesons, we investigate the transition form factors of B(Bs)B(B_s) mesons decay into a scalar meson in the perturbative QCD approach. In the large recoiling region, the form factors are dominated by the short-distance dynamics and can be calculated using perturbation theory. We adopt the dipole parametrization to recast the q2q^2 dependence of the form factors. Since the decay constants defined by the scalar current are large, our predictions on the Bβ†’SB\to S form factors are much larger than the Bβ†’PB\to P transitions, especially in the second scenario. Contributions from various light-cone distribution amplitudes (LCDAs) are elaborated and we find that the twist-3 LCDAs provide more than a half contributions to the form factors. The two terms of the twist-2 LCDAs give destructive contributions in the first scenario while they give constructive contributions in the second scenario. With the form factors, we also predict the decay width and branching ratios of the semileptonic Bβ†’SlΞ½Λ‰B\to Sl\bar\nu and Bβ†’Sl+lβˆ’B\to Sl^+l^- decays. The branching ratios of Bβ†’SlΞ½Λ‰B\to Sl\bar\nu channels are found to have the order of 10βˆ’410^{-4} while those of Bβ†’Sl+lβˆ’B\to Sl^+l^- have the order of 10βˆ’710^{-7}. These predictions can be tested by the future experiments.Comment: 20 pages, 31 figure

    Transition form factors of B decays into p-wave axial-vector mesons in the perturbative QCD approach

    Full text link
    The Bu,d,sβ†’V,AB_{u,d,s}\to V,A form factors are studied in perturbative QCD approach (V,AV,A denote a vector meson and two kinds of p-wave axial-vector mesons: 3P1^3P_1 and 1P1^1P_1 states, respectively.). The form factors are directly studied in the large recoiling region and extrapolated to the whole kinematic region within the dipole parametrization. Adopting decay constants with different signs for the two kinds of axial-vectors, we find that the two kinds of Bβ†’AB\to A form factors have the same sign. The two strange mesons K1AK_{1A} and K1BK_{1B} mix with each other via the SU(3) symmetry breaking effect. In order to reduce the ambiguities in the mixing angle between K1AK_{1A} and K1BK_{1B}, we propose a model-independent way that utilizes the B decay data. Most of the branching fractions of the semilteptonic Bβ†’AlΞ½Λ‰lB\to Al\bar \nu_l decays are of the order 10βˆ’410^{-4}, which still need experimental tests in the on-going and forthcoming experiments.Comment: 22 pages, 7 figure

    Multifunctional Optoelectronic Device Based on Resistive Switching Effects

    Get PDF
    Optoelectronic resistive switching devices, utilizing optical and electrical hybrid methods to control the resistance states, offer several advantages of both photons and electrons for high-performance information detecting, demodulating, processing, and memorizing. In the past decades, optoelectronic resistive switching devices have been widely discussed and studied due to the potential for parallel information transmission and processing. In this chapter, recent progresses on the optoelectronic resistive switching mechanism, materials, and devices will be introduced. Then, their performance such as photoresponsivity, on/off ratio, as well as retention will be investigated. Furthermore, possible applications of the optoelectronic resistive switching considering logic, memory, neuromorphic, and image-processing devices will be summarized. In the end, the challenges and possible solutions of optoelectronic resistive switching devices for the next-generation information technology will be discussed and prospected
    • …
    corecore