Missed opportunities for HIV testing among patients newly presenting for HIV care at a Swiss university hospital: a retrospective analysis.

To determine the frequency of missed opportunities (MOs) among patients newly diagnosed with HIV, risk factors for presenting MOs and the association between MOs and late presentation (LP) to care. Retrospective analysis. HIV outpatient clinic at a Swiss tertiary hospital. Patients aged ≥18 years newly presenting for HIV care between 2010 and 2015. Number of medical visits, up to 5 years preceding HIV diagnosis, at which HIV testing had been indicated, according to Swiss HIV testing recommendations. A visit at which testing was indicated but not performed was considered an MO for HIV testing. Complete records were available for all 201 new patients of whom 51% were male and 33% from sub-Saharan Africa. Thirty patients (15%) presented with acute HIV infection while 119 patients (59%) were LPs (CD4 counts <350 cells/mm <sup>3</sup> at diagnosis). Ninety-four patients (47%) had presented at least one MO, of whom 44 (47%) had multiple MOs. MOs were more frequent among individuals from sub-Saharan Africa, men who have sex with men and patients under follow-up for chronic disease. MOs were less frequent in LPs than non-LPs (42.5% vs 57.5%, p=0.03). At our centre, 47% of patients presented at least one MO. While our LP rate was higher than the national figure of 49.8%, LPs were less likely to experience MOs, suggesting that these patients were diagnosed late through presenting late, rather than through being failed by our hospital. We conclude that, in addition to optimising provider-initiated testing, access to testing must be improved among patients who are unaware that they are at HIV risk and who do not seek healthcare

Rubor, calor, dolor, tumor : infections de la peau et des tissus mous [Rubor, calor, dolor, tumor : skin and soft tissue infections]

Skin infections are a frequent cause of consultation, yet the diagnosis can be challenging for physicians. Microbiological documentation is rare, and empiric antibiotic regimens should cover the most commonly identified bacteria, i.e. streptococci Staphylococcus aureus. Other pathogens should be considered in case of immunosuppression or certain exposures. Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a severe but rare infection. Early surgical management in parallel with antibiotics is the cornerstone of treatment. Despite the high incidence of these infections, little progress has been made in their management and some areas of uncertainty exist, especially regarding the optimal duration of treatment, the prevention of recurrences and the use of polyclonal immunoglobulins for NF. This article reviews the main aspects of diagnosis and treatment of these infections

Pulse Oximetry as an Aid to Rule Out Pneumonia among Patients with a Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Primary Care.

Guidelines recommend chest X-rays (CXRs) to diagnose pneumonia and guide antibiotic treatment. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors of pneumonia that are visible on a chest X-ray (CXR+) which could support ruling out pneumonia and avoiding unnecessary CXRs, including oxygen saturation. A secondary analysis was performed in a clinical trial that included patients with suspected pneumonia in Swiss primary care. CXRs were reviewed by two radiologists. We evaluated the association between clinical signs (heart rate > 100/min, respiratory rate ≥ 24/min, temperature ≥ 37.8 °C, abnormal auscultation, and oxygen saturation < 95%) and CXR+ using multivariate analysis. We also calculated the diagnostic performance of the associated clinical signs combined in a clinical decision rule (CDR), as well as a CDR derived from a large meta-analysis (at least one of the following: heart rate > 100/min, respiratory rate ≥ 24/min, temperature ≥ 37.8 °C, or abnormal auscultation). Out of 469 patients from the initial trial, 107 had a CXR and were included in this study. Of these, 26 (24%) had a CXR+. We found that temperature and oxygen saturation were associated with CXR+. A CDR based on the presence of either temperature ≥ 37.8 °C and/or an oxygen saturation level < 95% had a sensitivity of 69% and a negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.45. The CDR from the meta-analysis had a sensitivity of 92% and an LR- of 0.37. The addition of saturation < 95% to this CDR increased the sensitivity (96%) and decreased the LR- (0.21). In conclusion, this study suggests that pulse oximetry could be added to a simple CDR to decrease the probability of pneumonia to an acceptable level and avoid unnecessary CXRs

SARS-CoV-2, un point dans la tourmente [SARS-CoV-2, a point in the storm]

Since its emergence in December 2019, scientific knowledge about the SARS-CoV-2 virus has evolved rapidly but, due to the complexity and novelty of this infection and its political and economic stakes, much remains to be clarified. Thousands of studies have already been published and scientific research is constantly evolving. In this multitude of information, we offer an update of the knowledge currently available. A limitation of the propagation, the understanding of the functioning of the virus and its clinical manifestations, the administration of specific treatments, rapid and reliable diagnostic tools are the basis of the fight against this germ, which is still little known today

Prescription des antibiotiques guidée par les biomarqueurs en médecine de famille : CRP ou PCT ? [Biomarker-guided antibiotics prescription for lower respiratory tract infections in primary care : CRP or PCT ?]

Lower respiratory tract infections are a frequent cause of excessive antibiotic prescription. The use of CRP and PCT has been evaluated by recent trials as a mean to assist antibiotic prescription. These studies suggest a safe reduction of antibiotic usage when prescription is guided by biomarkers. There is at the moment no evidence benefiting one of the biomarkers over the other, but a recent Swiss trial could suggest an added benefit for PCT. For now, PCT is less available, more expensive and not reimbursed. Democratization of its use, and/or clear thresholds for the use of CRP are additional ways that could participate to reduce excessive antibiotic prescription in primary care

Impact of 2020 EUCAST criteria on meropenem prescription for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: an observational study in a university hospital.

We aimed to evaluate the impact of the 10th version of European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints table, where most antipseudomonal drugs but meropenem are now categorised as "Susceptible, increased exposure" and labelled I, on meropenem prescription for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. In this retrospective single-centre observational study, we analysed antimicrobial therapies prescribed after susceptibility testing in all consecutive adult patients treated for P. aeruginosa infections between 01.08.2019 and 30.07.2020 in Lausanne University Hospital, Switzerland. We collected epidemiological, microbiological, clinical data, antimicrobial therapy, and infectious diseases specialists (IDs) consultations' data. The primary outcome was the prescription of meropenem to treat P. aeruginosa infections after release of susceptibility testing results. Secondary outcomes were: the use of increased dosage for non-meropenem anti-pseudomonal drugs, and IDs' consultations rates after susceptibility testing was made available. Among the 264 patients included, 40 (15.2%) received meropenem, 3.4% (5/148) before EUCAST update versus 30.2% (35/116) after (p < 0.001). Supervision and counselling from IDs and the use of increased dosages of non-carbapenem antibiotics also increased respectively (40.5% (60/148) vs 62.9% (73/116), P < 0.001); (55.5% (76/148) vs 88.9% (72/116), P < 0.001). Factors associated with these increments could not be adequately modelled. The change to 2020 EUCAST criteria might be associated with increased odds of meropenem prescription for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections stressing the need of prescribers' education and the importance of antibiotic stewardship interventions

HIV testing in termination of pregnancy and colposcopy services: a scoping review.

Women and girls are relatively under-represented across the HIV treatment cascade. Two conditions unique to women, pregnancy and cervical cancer/dysplasia, share a common acquisition mode with HIV. This scoping review aimed to explore HIV testing practices in voluntary termination of pregnancy (TOP) and colposcopy services. The scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched articles published up to 20 December 2020 using three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar) and including the keywords "HIV Testing", "Abortion, Induced", "Colposcopy", "HIV screen*" and "termination of pregnancy". A total of 1496 articles were identified, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria. We included studies providing background HIV prevalence in addition to prevalence in the study population and studies of women seeking TOP rather than presenting with TOP complications. This limited our review to high-income, low HIV prevalence settings. We observed two study phases: studies pre-antiretroviral therapy (ART) using unlinked anonymous testing data and examining HIV risk factors associated with positive HIV tests and studies post-ART using routine testing data and exploring HIV testing uptake. HIV prevalence was estimated at >0.2% in most TOP settings and >1% (range 1.7%-11.4%) in colposcopy services. Many TOP providers did not have local HIV testing policies and HIV testing was not mentioned in many specialist guidelines. Testing uptake was 49%-96% in TOP and 23%-75% in colposcopy services. Given the estimated HIV prevalence of >0.1% among women attending TOP and colposcopy services, HIV testing would be economically feasible to perform in high-income settings. Explicit testing policies are frequently lacking in these two settings, both at the local level and in specialist guidelines. Offering HIV testing regardless of risk factors could normalise testing, reduce late HIV presentation and create an opportunity for preventive counselling

Procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care testing to determine antibiotic prescription in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: pragmatic cluster randomised trial.

To assess whether point-of care procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography can safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic treatment in patients with lower respiratory tract infections in primary care. Three group, pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial from September 2018 to March 2020. 60 Swiss general practices. One general practitioner per practice was included. General practitioners screen all patients with acute cough; patients with clinical pneumonia were included. Randomisation in a 1:1:1 of general practitioners to either antibiotics guided by sequential procalcitonin and lung ultrasonography point-of-care tests (UltraPro; n=152), procalcitonin guided antibiotics (n=195), or usual care (n=122). Primary outcome was proportion of patients in each group prescribed an antibiotic by day 28. Secondary outcomes included duration of restricted activities due to lower respiratory tract infection within 14 days. 60 general practitioners included 469 patients (median age 53 years (interquartile range 38-66); 278 (59%) were female). Probability of antibiotic prescription at day 28 was lower in the procalcitonin group than in the usual care group (0.40 v 0.70, cluster corrected difference -0.26 (95% confidence interval -0.41 to -0.10)). No significant difference was seen between UltraPro and procalcitonin groups (0.41 v 0.40, -0.03 (-0.17 to 0.12)). The median number of days with restricted activities by day 14 was 4 days in the procalcitonin group and 3 days in the usual care group (difference 1 day (95% confidence interval -0.23 to 2.32); hazard ratio 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.58 to 0.97)), which did not prove non-inferiority. Compared with usual care, point-of-care procalcitonin led to a 26% absolute reduction in the probability of 28 day antibiotic prescription without affecting patients' safety. Point-of-care lung ultrasonography did not further reduce antibiotic prescription, although a potential added value cannot be excluded, owing to the wide confidence intervals. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03191071