The New Legal Pluralism

Scholars studying interactions among multiple communities have often used the term legal pluralism to describe the inevitable intermingling of normative systems that results from these interactions. In recent years, a new application of pluralist insights has emerged in the international and transnational realm. This review aims to survey and help define this emerging field of global legal pluralism. I begin by briefly describing sites for pluralism research, both old and new. Then I discuss how pluralism has come to be seen as an attractive analytical framework for those interested in studying law on the world stage. Finally, I identify advantages of a pluralist approach and respond to criticisms, and I suggest ways in which pluralism can help both in reframing old conceptual debates and in generating useful normative insights for designing procedural mechanisms, institutions, and discursive practices for managing hybrid legal/cultural spaces

Modifying Provider Behavior: A Low-tech Approach to Pharmaceutical Ordering

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a clinically structured, paper-based prescription form can modify pharmaceutical prescribing behavior without restricting physician freedom to select the most appropriate medication for an individual patient. DESIGN: Uncontrolled, nonrandomized, time series design. SETTING: The urgent care clinic of a university-affiliated, county-supported hospital that provides care for underserved, vulnerable populations. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 2,189) who had a prescription written at the intervention site during the study. INTERVENTION: Four-phase interventions lasting 2 weeks each, with a washout period between each phase, consisting of: (1) collection of baseline data utilizing the traditional prescription blank, (2) introduction of the pre-formatted prescription form, (3) use of the pre-formatted prescription form with medication cost added, and (4) pre-formatted prescription form with target drug (ranitidine) removed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Physicians were less likely to prescribe ranitidine compared to cimetidine after the introduction of the cost information (P < .01) and again after the removal of ranitidine from the pre-formatted prescription form (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A structured, paper-based prescription order form can shift prescribing practices without inhibiting physicians' ordering freedom