Accuracy of GFR estimating equations in patients with discordances between creatinine and cystatin C-based estimations

Background Cystatin C is recommended as a confirmatory test to eGFR when more precise estimates are needed for clinical decision making. Although eGFR on the basis of both creatinine and cystatin (eGFR(cr-cys)) is the most accurate estimate in research studies, it is uncertain whether this is true in real-world settings, particularly when there are large discordances between eGFR based on creatinine (eGFR(cr)) and that based on cystatin C (eGFR(cys))Methods We included 6185 adults referred for measured GFR (mGFR) using plasma clearance of iohexol in Stockholm, Sweden, who had 9404 concurrent measurements of creatinine, cystatin C, and iohexol clearance. The performance of eGFR(cr), eGFR(cys), and eGFR(cr-cys) was assessed against mGFR with median bias, P-30, and correct classification of GFR categories. We stratified analyses within three categories: eGFR(cys) at least 20% lower than eGFR(cr) (eGFR(cys)eGFR(cr)).Results eGFR(cr) and eGFR(cys) were similar in 4226 (45%) samples, and among these samples all three estimating equations performed similarly. By contrast, eGFR(cr-cys) was much more accurate in cases of discordance. For example, when eGFR(cys)eGFR(cr) (8% of samples), the median biases were -4.5, 8.4, and 1.4 ml/min per 1.73m(2). The findings were consistent among individuals with cardiovascular disease, heart failure, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, and cancer.Conclusions When eGFR(cr) and eGFR(cys) are highly discordant in clinical practice, eGFR(cr-cys) is more accurate than either eGFR(cr) or eGFR(cys).Clinical epidemiolog

Pharmacogenetics of Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events in Direct Oral Anticoagulant Users

Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsThis study aimed to analyze associations between genetic variants and the occurrence of clinical outcomes in dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban users. This was a retrospective real-world study linking genotype data of three Finnish biobanks with national register data on drug dispensations and healthcare encounters. We investigated several single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in the ABCG2, ABCB1, CES1, and CYP3A5 genes potentially associated with bleeding or thromboembolic events in direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) users based on earlier research. We used Cox regression models to compare the incidence of clinical outcomes between carriers and noncarriers of the SNVs or haplotypes. In total, 1,806 patients on apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban were studied. The ABCB1 c.3435C>T (p.Ile1145=, rs1045642) SNV (hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.18-0.98, P = 0.044) and 1236T-2677T-3435T (rs1128503-rs2032582-rs1045642) haplotype (HR 0.44, 95% CI, 0.20-0.95, P = 0.036) were associated with a reduced risk for thromboembolic outcomes, and the 1236C-2677G-3435C (HR 2.55, 95% CI, 1.03-6.36, P = 0.044) and 1236T-2677G-3435C (HR 5.88, 95% CI, 2.35-14.72, P A (rs4148738) SNV associated with a lower risk for bleeding events (HR 0.37, 95% CI, 0.16-0.89, P = 0.025) in apixaban users. ABCB1 variants are potential factors affecting thromboembolic events in rivaroxaban users and bleeding events in apixaban users. Studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted for comprehensive assessment of the pharmacogenetic associations of DOACs and their relevance for clinical practice.Peer reviewe

Sex differences in the associations between L-arginine pathway metabolites, skeletal muscle mass and function, and their responses to resistance exercise, in old age

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J015911/1) and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials. gov Identifier: NCT02843009). Supplementary email included with articlePeer reviewedPostprin