Stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery: a retrospective cohort survey.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Our aim was to estimate the prevalence of stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery and analyze its risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort survey was conducted in a French university hospital. The 669 primiparous women who delivered in our department in 1996 a singleton in a vertex position between 37 and 41 weeks of amenorrhea were included. A mailed questionnaire was sent 4 years after the indexed delivery. The main outcome measure was stress urinary incontinence 4 years after the first delivery. RESULTS: Three hundred and seven women replied, 274 had moved and 88 did not respond. Four years after the first delivery, prevalence of stress urinary incontinence was 29% (89/307). According to multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors were urine leakage before the first pregnancy [odds ratio (OR) 18.7; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-96.4], urine leakage during the first pregnancy (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.3-4.8), duration of first labor > or = 8 h (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.7-5.7), mother's age > 30 years at the first delivery (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.2) and cesarean section at the first delivery (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1-0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that stress urinary incontinence after pregnancy arises from a multifactorial condition. The main risk factors are: age, previous incontinence (before or during the first pregnancy), prolonged labor and vaginal delivery

Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy.

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To compare two policies for episiotomy: restrictive and systematic. DESIGN: Quasi-randomised comparative study. SETTING: Two French university hospitals with contrasting policies for episiotomy: one using episiotomy restrictively and the second routinely. POPULATION: Seven hundred and seventy-four nulliparous women delivered during 1996 of a singleton in cephalic presentation at a term of 37-41 weeks. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed 4 years after delivery. Sample size was calculated to allow us to show a 10% difference in the prevalence of urinary incontinence with 80% power. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, perineal pain, and pain during intercourse. RESULTS: We received 627 responses (81%), 320 from women delivered under the restrictive policy, 307 from women delivered under the routine policy. In the restrictive group, 186 (49%) deliveries included mediolateral episiotomies and in the routine group, 348 (88%). Four years after the first delivery, there was no difference in the prevalence of urinary incontinence (26 versus 32%), perineal pain (6 versus 8%), or pain during intercourse (18 versus 21%) between the two groups. Anal incontinence was less prevalent in the restrictive group (11 versus 16%). The difference was significant for flatus (8 versus 13%) but not for faecal incontinence (3% for both groups). Logistic regression confirmed that a policy of routine episiotomy was associated with a risk of anal incontinence nearly twice as high as the risk associated with a restrictive policy (OR = 1.84, 95% CI: 1.05-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: A policy of routine episiotomy does not protect against urinary or anal incontinence 4 years after first delivery