Follow-up on the effects of the space environment on UHCRE thermal blankets

An overview of the effects of the space environment on the thermal blanket of the UHCRE experiment is presented with an emphasis on atomic oxygen (AO) erosion. A more accurate value for FEP Teflon reaction efficiency is given and corresponds, at normal incidence, to 3.24 10(exp -25) cu cm/atomic, therefore, the FEP Teflon erosion corresponding to the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF) total mission is 29.5 microns. A power 1.44 of the cosine of the incident angle of the oxygen atoms is found. It is shown that this value is not far from the power found using Fergusson's relationship between efficiency and energy of the O-atoms. An hypothesis concerning the effect of oxygen ions (O(+)) is also presented. The presence of oxygen ions may explain the different results obtained from different flights and from laboratory tests. Finally an XPS analysis of Chemglaze Z306(tm) black paint demonstrates the presence of silicone in the paint which may explain part of the contamination found on LDEF

Effects of the LDEF environment on the Ag/FEP thermal blankets

This presentation was made by Francois Levadou at the NASA Langley Research Center LDEF materials workshop, November 19-22, 1991. It represents the results to date on the examination of silvered teflon thermal blankets primarily from the Ultra-heavy Cosmic Ray Experiment and also from the blanket from the Park Seed Company experiment. ESA/ESTEC and Boeing conducted a number of independent measurements on the blankets and in particular on the exposed fluorinated ethylene-propylene (FEP) layer of the blankets. Mass loss, thickness, and thickness profile measurements have been used by ESA, Boeing, and NASA LeRC to determine recession and average erosion yield under atomic oxygen exposure. Tensile strength and percent elongation to failure data, surface characterization by ESCA, and SEM images are presented. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory analysis of vacuum radiation effects is also presented. The results obtained by the laboratories mentioned and additional results from the Aerospace Corporation on samples provided by Boeing are quite similar and give confidence in the validity of the data