The application of Evidence-Based Medicine methodologies in sports science: problems and solutions

This thesis analyses the use of 'Evidence-Based' methodologies of evidence assessment and intervention and policy design from medicine, and their use in sport and exercise science. It argues that problems exist with the application of Evidence-Based methodologies in sports science, meaning that the quality of evidence used to inform decision-making is lower than is often assumed. This thesis also offers realistic solutions to these problems, broadly arguing for the importance of taking evidence from mechanistic studies seriously, in addition to evidence from RCTs

Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: an overview of systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness. A pre-published protocol

INTRODUCTION. Many authors are in favour of using systematic reviews as a method for evidence synthesis in rehabilitation and the last decade has introduced several guidelines to help with their implementation in rehabilitation contexts. At present, however, there is little clear information about the quantity and quality of systematic reviews on TBI rehabilitation interventions. AIM. We aim to conduct an overview of systematic reviews published on TBI rehabilitation interventions in order to summarise the current state of evidence in this area of clinical practice. In addition to providing information on strength of evidence for intervention effectiveness, our goal is to research and summarise two additional domains: reviews’ characteristics and evidence gaps. METHODS. We will carry out a comprehensive search of the Cochrane Library database (including Database of Abstracts and Reviews of Effectiveness) MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Epistemonikos, PDQ-evidence, and PubMed to find relevant systematic reviews. We also will make efforts to identify ongoing reviews by searching for protocols in the Cochrane Library database and in PROSPERO. We are not going to search grey literature. We will use Covidence (https://www.covidence.org/home) to manage review selection. Two review team members will independently select the reviews to be included to the overview. A third researcher will be consulted for resolving disagreements. We will use Knack software (https://www.knack.com/), to extract data on review characteristics and review findings. We will include the systematic reviews on the adult TBI population (regardless of severity, stage of recovery, or other aspects of clinical presentation), any kind of rehabilitation interventions (regardless of setting, uni- or multidisciplinarity etc) to describe review characteristics. From those systematic reviews the ones with comparisons with no treatment, placebo or sham treatment, and usual care; and with outcomes such as quality of life, activity and participation – as per International Classification of Functioning, Disability & Health –residential status, family burden, and adverse effects will provide basis for intervention effectiveness analysis. We will assess the quality of reporting with updated PRISMA (Transparent Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) by making a judgement of “yes/no/unclear” without further descriptions. We will assess the methodological quality of included reviews with AMSTAR 2 (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) instrument. SYNTHESIS. We will provide a report on the characteristics of all included reviews using simple statistical analyses and narrative accounts and the main summary of results based on intervention effectiveness. Also, we aim to present conclusions specific to each intervention in terms of the current evidence base: statistical and/or narrative descriptions of effects and the evidence quality, relevant contextual factors, population, rehabilitation setting, and comparisons researched. We will not perform meta-analysis. In order to example gaps in the current evidence of TBI rehabilitation, we will separately summarise the information on ICF categorizations covered with low or very-low quality evidence or no evidence at all from existing systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS. To support knowledge translation, we will organise the overview of reviews’ findings as comprehensive evidence maps

Exploring the experience of sleep and fatigue in male and female adults over the 2 years following traumatic brain injury: a qualitative descriptive study

To explore the experience of fatigue and sleep difficulties over the first 2 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Longitudinal qualitative descriptive analysis of interviews completed as part of a larger longitudinal study of recovery following TBI. Data relating to the experience of fatigue and/or sleep were extracted and coded by two independent researchers. Community-based study in the Hamilton and Auckland regions of New Zealand. 30 adult participants who had experienced mild, moderate or severe brain injury within the past 6 months (>16 years of age). 15 participants also nominated significant others to take part. Interviews were completed at 6, 12 and 24 months postinjury. Participants described feeling unprepared for the intensity, impact and persistent nature of fatigue and sleep difficulties after injury. They struggled to learn how to manage their difficulties by themselves and to adapt strategies in response to changing circumstances over time. Four themes were identified: (1) Making sense of fatigue and sleep after TBI; (2) accepting the need for rest; (3) learning how to rest and; (4) need for rest impacts on ability to engage in life. Targeted support to understand, accept and manage the sleep and fatigue difficulties experienced may be crucial to improve recovery and facilitate engagement in everyday life. Advice needs to be timely and revised for relevance over the course of recovery

Factors influencing referral to and uptake and attendance of pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences of service users, their families, and healthcare providers (Protocol)

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Qualitative). The object ives are as follows: • To identify factors that influence referral to pulmonary rehab ilitation for COPD from the perspective of service users, thei r family/carers, and healthcare providers. • To identify factors that influence uptake of pulmonary rehabil itation for COPD (i.e. at least one attendance of an assessment or first programme session) from the perspective of service users , their family/carers, and healthcare providers. • To identify factors that influence attendance at pulmonary reha bilitation programmes for COPD from the perspective of servi ce users, their family/carers, and healthcare providers. • To develop an inductive explanatory framework for how these f actors may interact to contribute to better or poorer uptake or completion of pulmonary rehabilitation in order to guide acti ons of healthcare decision-makers to improve opportunities fo r people with COPD to benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation

Neptune to the Common-wealth of England (1652): the republican Britannia and the continuity of interests

In the seventeenth century, John Kerrigan reminds us, “models of empire did not always turn on monarchy”. In this essay, I trace a vision of “Neptune’s empire” shared by royalists and republicans, binding English national interest to British overseas expansion. I take as my text a poem entitled “Neptune to the Common-wealth of England”, prefixed to Marchamont Nedham’s 1652 English translation of Mare Clausum (1635), John Selden’s response to Mare Liberum (1609) by Hugo Grotius. This minor work is read alongside some equally obscure and more familiar texts in order to point up the ways in which it speaks to persistent cultural and political interests. I trace the afterlife of this verse, its critical reception and its unique status as a fragment that exemplifies the crossover between colonial republic and imperial monarchy at a crucial moment in British history, a moment that, with Brexit, remains resonant

Cochrane Rehabilitation Methodology Committee: an international survey of priorities for future work

Cochrane Rehabilitation aims to improve the application of evidence-based practice in rehabilitation. It also aims to support Cochrane in the production of reliable, clinically meaningful syntheses of evidence related to the practice of rehabilitation, while accommodating the many methodological challenges facing the field. To this end, Cochrane Rehabilitation established a Methodology Committee to examine, explore and find solutions for the methodological challenges related to evidence synthesis and knowledge translation in rehabilitation. We conducted an international online survey via Cochrane Rehabilitation networks to canvass opinions regarding the future work priorities for this committee and to seek information on people's current capabilities to assist with this work. The survey findings indicated strongest interest in work on how reviewers have interpreted and applied Cochrane methods in reviews on rehabilitation topics in the past, and on gathering a collection of existing publications on review methods for undertaking systematic reviews relevant to rehabilitation. Many people are already interested in contributing to the work of the Methodology Committee and there is a large amount of expertise for this work in the extended Cochrane Rehabilitation network already

Cochrane Rehabilitation "tagging" of Cochrane Reviews 1996 - August 2018

This dataset contains all reviews and protocols published by Cochrane (titles, abstracts and URLs), screened by the Cochrane Rehabilitation Review Committee, and 'tagged' for relevance to rehabilitation, professional groups involved, and broad clinical area. Duplicate publications (including completed reviews published after a published protocol and updated reviews published during the screening period) are highlighted in column F based on Access Number. Last updated 17 November 2018