Geophysical lineaments of Arizona

Photolineaments seen on satellite images are usually expressions of deep crustal ruptures. However, photolineaments are omnipresent and an independent expression of regional discontinuities is needed to help rank the photolineaments. Published gravity and magnetic contour maps of Arizona were analyzed to produce a single geophysical lineament map to indicate trends of regional basement structures. This map shows that the southwestern quarter of Arizona is dominated by a NNW-ENE orthogonal system whereas the remainder of the state is gridded by a NW-NE system. North-south systems are present throughout the state, as are EW lineaments. Arizona is transected by the WNW Texas Strand, but other shorter systems trending in the Texas direction are found throughout the state south of the Strand. The major lineament systems as seen on Landsat, gravity, and magnetic maps correlate reasonably well with known geothermal manifestations. Many other systems are Precambrian, Paleozoic, and/or Mesozoic in age but appear to control the location of Quaternary volcanic systems

Beyond weakness: Exploring intramuscular fat and quadriceps atrophy in ACLR recovery.

Muscle weakness following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) increases the risk of posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA). However, focusing solely on muscle weakness overlooks other aspects like muscle composition, which could hinder strength recovery. Intramuscular fat is a non-contractile element linked to joint degeneration in idiopathic OA, but its role post-ACLR has not been thoroughly investigated. To bridge this gap, we aimed to characterize quadriceps volume and intramuscular fat in participants with ACLR (male/female = 15/9, age = 22.8 ± 3.6 years, body mass index [BMI] = 23.2 ± 1.9, time since surgery = 3.3 ± 0.9 years) and in controls (male/female = 14/10, age = 22.0 ± 3.1 years, BMI = 23.3 ± 2.6) while also exploring the associations between intramuscular fat and muscle volume with isometric strength. Linear mixed effects models assessed (I) muscle volume, (II) intramuscular fat, and (III) strength between limbs (ACLR vs. contralateral vs. control). Regression analyses were run to determine if intramuscular fat or volume were associated with quadriceps strength. The ACLR limb was 8%-11% smaller than the contralateral limb (p < 0.05). No between-limb differences in intramuscular fat were observed (p 0.091-0.997). Muscle volume but not intramuscular fat was associated with strength in the ACLR and control limbs (p < 0.001-0.002). We demonstrate that intramuscular fat does not appear to be an additional source of quadriceps dysfunction following ACLR and that muscle size only explains some of the variance in muscle strength