2 research outputs found
An In-Depth Examination of the Implementation of the Disability Equality Duty in England: Report for the Office for Disability Issues
This seven-month study examined the
implementation of the Disability Equality Duty
(DED) in England. The DED, introduced through
the Disability Discrimination Act 2005, applies to
public authorities in England, Wales and Scotland.
The DED comprises a general duty and specific
duties. The general duty requires public authorities
to carry out their functions with due regard to the
need to promote equality between disabled and
non-disabled people. The specific duties require
public authorities to publish a Disability Equality
Scheme (DES) setting out how they intend to fulfil
their general duty and specific duties. In addition,
certain Secretaries of State must publish an
overarching report for their policy sectors every
three years. A Code of Practice1
to assist authorities
with implementing the Duty was published by the
then Disability Rights Commission
Mainstreaming the Disability Equality Duty and the impact on public authorities' working practices
Implemented as part of the 2005 amendments to the Disability Equality Act, the Disability Equality Duty (DED) placed new and important demands on public sector bodies. All such organisations are required to develop policies and working practices which actively promote the equality of disabled people as employees, consumers or visitors. The promotion of equality has to be proactive as opposed to reactive and must be mainstreamed into the normal day to day activities of organisational working practices. Whilst the DED follows on from the framework of previous anti-discrimination legislation set in place over the last fifteen years, it represents a significant change in equality legislation, demands that public sector bodies instigate fundamental changes in their approach towards disability. This article reports on the initial stages of the implementation process of the DED across a range of public sector organisations in England, focussing in particular on how this policy has impacted on mainstreaming. Discussion shows that although organisations show awareness of mainstreaming and its implications for disability equality, there is limited evidence to suggest that the public sector has fully embraced this agenda