Hyperparathyroidism in multiple endocrine neoplasia type II A

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2A occurs in only 15-30% of patients. It is rarely the first feature recognized in the syndrome, is generally mild and is sometimes expressed only as parathyroid tumors discovered during surgery for medullary thyroid carcinoma. A predisposition to MEN 2 is caused by germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene on chromosome 10q11.2. Genetic studies have demonstrated the association of PHPT with a specific mutation at codon 634 (C634R). Therefore, all codon 634 mutation carriers are at some risk for hyperparathyroidism and should be submitted to an early screening of the disease. The rarity of MEN 2A-related PHPT has prevented the establishment of a well-defined therapeutic strategy for treating this condition, so that recommendations about the surgical approach have been controversial. Patients with MEN 2A should have annual screenings for hyperparathyroidism by serum calcium and intact parathyroid hormone level measurements. Parathyroidectomy should be considered in all patients who have some evidence of symptomatic disease. The objectives of parathyroid surgery are to a) obtain and maintain normocalcemia for the longest time possible, b) avoid iatrogenic hypoparathyroidism, and c) facilitate future surgery for recurrent disease. Finally, most of the patients with MEN 2A-related PHPT have mild disease and they could be classified as asymptomatic based on the NIH consensus conference regarding the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic PHPT. Therefore, these patients can be followed up safely without parathyroid surger

Use of low-molecular weight heparin, transfusion and mortality in COVID-19 patients not requiring ventilation

: It is still debated whether prophylactic doses of low-molecular- weight heparin (LMWH) are always effective in preventing Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) and mortality in COVID-19. Furthermore, there is paucity of data for those patients not requiring ventilation. We explored mortality and the safety/efficacy profile of LMWH in a cohort of Italian patients with COVID-19 who did not undergo ventilation. From the initial cohort of 422 patients, 264 were enrolled. Most (n = 156, 87.7%) received standard LMWH prophylaxis during hospitalization, with no significant difference between medical wards and Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Major or not major but clinically relevant hemorrhages were recorded in 13 (4.9%) patients: twelve in those taking prophylactic LMWH and one in a patient taking oral anticoagulants (p: n.s.). Thirty-nine patients (14.8%) with median age 75 years. were transfused. Hemoglobin (Hb) at admission was significantly lower in transfused patients and Hb at admission inversely correlated with the number of red blood cells units transfused (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality occurred in 76 (28.8%) patients, 46 (24.3%) of whom admitted to medical wards. Furthermore, Hb levels at admittance were significantly lower in fatalities (g/dl 12.3; IQR 2.4 vs. 13.3; IQR 2.8; Mann-Whitney U-test; p = 0.001). After the exclusion of patients treated by LMWH intermediate or therapeutic doses (n = 32), the logistic regression showed that prophylaxis significantly and independently reduced mortality (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.85). Present data show that COVID-19 patients who do not require ventilation benefit from prophylactic doses of LMWH