Clinic Services for Persons with AIDS: Experience in a High-Prevalence State

OBJECTIVE: To profile characteristics of clinics caring for persons with advanced HIV infection. DESIGN AND SETTING: Survey of clinic directors in New York State. PARTICIPANTS: Newly diagnosed Medicaid-enrolled AIDS patients in New York state in federal fiscal years 1987-1992 (n = 6,184) managed by 62 HIV specialty, 53 hospital-based general medicine/primary care, 36 community-based primary care, and 28 other clinics. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Telephone survey about clinic hours, emphasis on HIV, staffing, procedures, and directors' rating of care. Estimates of the number of newly diagnosed, Medicaid-enrolled AIDS patients treated in surveyed clinics were obtained from claims data. We found that community-based clinics were significantly more likely to have longer hours, a physician on call, or to accommodate unscheduled care than were hospital-based general medicine/primary care or other types of clinics. Compared with HIV specialty clinics, general medicine/primary care clinics were less likely to have HIV-specific care attributes such as a director of HIV care (98% vs 72%), multidisciplinary conferences on HIV care (83% vs 32%), or a standard initial HIV workup (90% vs 70%). Of general medicine/primary care clinics, most (83%) were staffed by residents and fellows compared with only 68% of HIV or 25% of community-based clinics (p < .001). General medicine/primary care clinics were less likely than community-based clinics to perform Pap smears (75% vs 94%) or to have case managers on payroll (21% vs 81%). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of clinics, hospital-based general medicine/primary care clinics managing the care of Medicaid enrollees with AIDS appeared to have more limited hours and availability of specific services than HIV specialty or community-based clinics

A Population-Based Approach to Asthma Disease Management

Asthma disease management (DM) programmes often focus on patients who are considered to be high resource users, such as those with recent emergency department visits and/or hospitalisations, or patients who have been diagnosed with severe persistent asthma. These programmes often focus on a few patients who have acute needs, but may not identify the populations with the highest future resource use. A population-based approach to disease management focuses on identifying deficiencies in asthma management across the population diagnosed with the disease and establishes a partnership between the patient, provider and healthcare plan to improve the overall quality of asthma care. The disease management approach described in this article is population-based, and is intended to raise the standard of medical care across a spectrum of patients with asthma.Asthma, Disease management programmes, Pharmacoeconomics

Impact of a Migraine Disease Management Program: Humanistic Outcomes

Objective: To assess the impact of a comprehensive migraine disease management program, as measured by humanistic outcomes measures, conducted in a managed care setting. Design: A prospective comparative study comprised of an intervention and a control group to evaluate the impact of the disease management initiative. Setting: Independent Practice Association (IPA)-type managed care organization. Study participants and main outcomes measures: Study participants resided in adjacent regions (intervention region included Minneapolis, MN, USA and the usual care region included St Paul, MN, USA and adjacent areas in MN, USA) separated by natural geographic barriers. Eligible patients were identified through a review of the Medica plan Interventions: Disease management intervention activities included patient and physician education, as well as a patient feedback report containing migraine care risk indicators, which was sent to the treating physicians. All patients were encouraged to contact their physicians if they reported two or more migraine management issues. Results: A total of 2232 patients with migraine were enrolled in the study (1373 from the intervention region and 859 in the control region). Compared with patients in the control region, patients in the intervention region reported, as measured by MTAQ, significant improvement in migraine symptom relief, more knowledge about potential migraine triggers, a decrease in economic burden, and more satisfaction with migraine treatment. In addition, the change in MIDAS scores from baseline showed a greater shift towards decreasing disability in the intervention group compared with the control group. However, no statistically significant improvement was detected in terms of health status as measured by SF-12. Of the participants in the intervention region who completed the program evaluation survey, 40% indicated that they called or visited their physicians regarding their migraine survey results if it was recommended. For those contacting their physicians, 76% had their medications changed and 75% noted an improvement in relief due to a change in medication. Conclusions: Considering the significant toll of migraine on patients, employers, and the healthcare system, healthcare plans should consider implementing migraine disease management programs to improve migraine care.Disease-management-programmes, Migraine, Outcomes-research

Perception and management of fever in infants up to six months of age: A survey of US pediatricans

Abstract Background A fever is an increase in the body's temperature above normal. This study examined how US pediatricians perceive and manage fever generally versus fever occurring after vaccination in infants up to six months of age. Methods A web-based survey of 400 US pediatricians subscribing to the Physician Desk Reference was conducted in December 2008. Data were collected on the respondents' socio-demographics, number of years in practice, type of practice, their definition of fever severity in infants, and their recommendations for managing fever. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate the odds of a pediatrician recommending an emergency room visit (ER) or a hospital admission, office visits, or other treatment option, as a function of infant's age, temperature, whether the infant has recently received a vaccine, and whether the fever was reported during or after office hours, adjusting for practice type and socio-demographic variables. Results On average, the 400 responding pediatricians' (64% were female, average age of 49 years, years in practice = 20 years) threshold for extremely serious fever was ≥39.5°C and ≥ 40.0°C for infants 0-2 month and >2-6 month of age respectively. Infants were more likely to be referred to an ER or hospital admission if they were ≤ 2 months of age (Odds Ratio [OR], 29.13; 95% Confidence interval [95% CI], 23.69-35.82) or >2-4 months old (OR 3.37; 95% CI 2.99-3.81) versus > 4 to 6 months old or if they had a temperature ≥ 40.0°C (OR 21.06; 95% CI 17.20-25.79) versus a temperature of 38.0-38.5°C. Fever after vaccination (OR 0.29; 95% CI 0.25-0.33) or reported during office hours (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.15-0.20) were less likely to result in referral to ER or hospital admission. Conclusion Within this sample of US pediatricians, perception of the severity of fever in infants, as well as the response to infant fever are likely to depend on the infant's age. Recommendations for the management of fever in infants are likely to depend on fever severity level, the infant age, timing in relation to recent vaccination, and the time of day fever is reported. Our results indicate that US pediatricians are more concerned about general fever than fever following vaccination.</p

Using the Pediatric Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire to Measure Asthma Control and Healthcare Utilization in Children

Background: The usefulness of questionnaires to assess asthma control in clinical practice is recognized in recent international guidelines. While several questionnaires have been developed to measure asthma control in adults, there has been little study of the performance of such instruments in children. Abstract: Objective: To determine whether there is an association between asthma-related healthcare use and poor asthma control, as determined by categorical score on the control domain of the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire for children and adolescents (the pediatric ATAQ). Abstract: Methods: An analysis of a 1998 mailed survey of parents or caregivers of children aged 5-17 years with asthma enrolled in three large managed-care organizations in the Northeast and Midwest US was conducted. Pediatric ATAQ control domain score (reported for the past 4 weeks) was the main outcome measure. The pediatric ATAQ control domain was scored from 0 to 7, with 0 indicating no asthma control problems as measured by the questionnaire, and higher scores indicating increasing asthma problems. The hypothesis of an association between pediatric ATAQ control domain score and asthma-related healthcare use (hospitalizations, ER or urgent care facility visits, and doctor visits for worsening asthma in the past 12 months) was examined. Abstract: Results: 406 completed surveys were received. Asthma-related hospitalizations, ER/urgent care visits, and doctor visits were reported for 38, 173, and 319 children, respectively. Of the three control score categories (0, 1-3, and 4-7), children with a control score of 4-7 were more likely to have been hospitalized (p - 0.01), to have visited the ER or urgent care facility (p < 0.0001), or to have visited a doctor (p - 0.0001) because of asthma managed care. In multivariate models including demographic variables and a measure of general health status, higher odds of ER/urgent care visits (odds ratio &lsqb;OR&rsqb; 3.47, 95% CI 1.92, 6.26) and doctor visits (OR 7.14; 95% CI 2.40, 21.2) was observed for children with an asthma control score of 4-7 than for children with no identified asthma control problems (score of 0). An asthma control score of 4-7 was significantly associated with hospitalization in a multivariate model including only demographic variables (OR 3.06; 95% CI 1.28, 7.33) but not in a model that included general health status (OR 2.44; 95% CI 0.96, 6.16). Relative to an excellent health status, a fair or poor health status was significantly associated with asthma-related hospitalization (OR 7.03; 95% CI 1.71, 28.87). Compared with White race, Black race was significantly associated with hospitalization (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.05, 5.04) and ER/urgent care visits (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.67, 5.01). Abstract: Conclusions: Children identified as having poor asthma control using the pediatric ATAQ instrument had significantly higher rates of asthma-related hospitalizations, ER or urgent care visits, and doctor visits than those with good control. This asthma control measure may be useful in identifying children in need of more intensive asthma management.