412 research outputs found
Growth modulation by means of anterior tethering resulting in progressive correction of juvenile idiopathic scoliosis: A case report
Surface Analysis of Tarnished Dental Alloys
Six crown and bridge alloys ranging in nobility between 25-63 wt % (18-45 at %) were analyzed by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), as well as by L*a*b* colorimetry before and after in vitro tarnishing in artificial saliva with and without additions of 0.00016, 0.016, and 1.6 % Na2S with a rotating wheel apparatus. All alloys except the lowest of 18 at % changed colors to about the same degree after 72 h of tarnishing. All alloys decreased in L*, while increased in both a* and b*, thus appearing darker and with increased redness and yellowness. This was due to localized darkening and to other products. For all alloys except one, saliva without sulfide promoted color changes more severe than for saliva with 0.016% Na2S. For the most part, analysis by EDS was unable to detect differences between the tarnished films and the as-polished surfaces. SIMS analysis, however, showed changes in the substrate ion (Cu, Ag, Pd, and In) peak intensities. In most cases the intensities decreased and with the decrease greater with the sulfide-free saliva than with sulfide-containing. This indicated that sulfide promoted insoluble deposition of products. Changes in the Ag, Pd, and In peak intensities followed much the same pattern as with Cu. The as-polished surfaces, even though carefully prepared, showed much contamination in the form of organics, namely C, CH, N, NH, 0, CHN, CN, as well as from Na, K, Ca, Si, S, Cl, and others. Most tarnished surfaces showed large increases in Na, K, and Ca, and with the sulfide-free saliva being more severe in this regard. The mass spectrum also showed peaks with atomic mass units in the ranqe 55-58 related to only some of the tarnished surfaces
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance: Surgical technique.
A comprehensive study of patients with surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal segmental instrumented fusion : When is fusion to L3 stable?
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for distal adding on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. METHODS: AIS patients undergoing PSF to L3 by two senior surgeons from 2000–2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results and defined as >3 cm of deviation from L3 to the center sacral vertical line (CSVL), or >10° angle at L3–4 on the posterior anterior- or lateral X-ray at ultimate follow-up. New stable vertebra (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores. RESULTS: Ten of 76 patients (13.1%) were included in the poor radiographic outcome group. The other 66 patients were included in the good radiographic outcome group. Lower Risser grade, more SV-3 (CSVL doesn’t touch the lowest instrumented vertebra [LIV]) on standing and side bending films, lesser NV and TS score, rigid L3–4 disc, more rotation and deviation of L3 were identified risk factors for AO or DJK. Age, number of fused vertebrae, curve correction, preoperative coronal/sagittal L3–4 disc angle did not differ significantly between the two groups. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative Risser grade 0, 1 (odds ratio [OR], 1.8), SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (OR, 2.1 and 2.8, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.4), rigid disc at L3–4 (OR, 3.1), LIV rotation >15° (OR, 2.9), and LIV deviation >2 cm from CSVL (OR, 2.2) were independent predictive factors. Although there was significant improvement of the of Scoliosis Research Society-22 average scores only in the good radiographic outcome group, there was no significant difference in the scores between the groups. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was 13.1%. To prevent AO or DJK following fusion to L3, we recommend that the CSVL touch L3 in both standing and side bending, TS score is -4 or less, the L3/4 disc is flexible, L3 is neutral (<15°) and ≤2 cm from the midline and the patient is ≥ Risser 2
The incidence of adding-on or distal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by anterior spinal fusion to L3 was significantly higher than by posterior spinal fusion to L3
OBJECTIVE: To compare and identify risk factors for distal adding-on (AO) or distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by anterior- (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF) to L3.
METHODS: AIS patients undergoing ASF versus PSF to L3 from 2000-2010 were analyzed. Distal AO and DJK were deemed poor radiographic results. New stable (SV) and neutral vertebra (NV) scores were defined for this study. The total stability (TS) score was the sum of the SV and NV scores.
RESULTS: Twenty of 42 (ASF group: 47.6%) and 8 of 72 patients (PSF group: 11.1%) showed poor radiographic outcome. Fused vertebrae, correction rate of main curve, coronal reduction rate of L3 were significantly higher in PSF group. Multiple logistic regression results indicated that preoperative SV-3 at L3 in standing and side benders (odds ratio [OR], 2.7 and 3.7, respectively), TS score -5, -6 at L3 (OR, 4.9), rigid disc at L3-4 (OR, 3.7), lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) rotation \u3e 15° (OR, 3.3), LIV deviation \u3e 2 cm from center sacral vertical line (OR, 3.1) and ASF (OR, 13.4; p \u3c 0.001) were independent predictive factors. There was significant improvement of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 average scores only in PSF group. Furthermore, the ultimate scores of PSF group were significantly superior to ASF group.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of AO or DJK at ultimate follow-up for AIS with LIV at L3 was significantly higher in ASF group. Ultimate SRS-22 scores were significantly better in PSF group
- …